The bullet was yawing not tumbling.
You don't know that. That's sheer speculation. You don't have a shred of evidence that the Connally back-wound bullet was yawing or tumbling. Connally's back wound was only 1.5 cm wide, the same width as JFK's rear head wound, yet no one has ever claimed that the JFK rear-head-shot bullet was yawing or tumbling. JFK's head wound was 1.5 x 0.6 cm, while Connally's back wound was 1.5 x 0.8 cm. Yet, again, not a soul has ever suggested that the JFK rear-head-shot bullet was yawing or tumbling.
And, just FYI, quite a few of your fellow WC apologists have long claimed that the bullet that hit Connally's back was tumbling--in fact, a number of them have claimed that the bullet hit him sideways. They've made this claim in relation to the bogus assertion that Connally's back wound was 3 cm wide (that was the size of the wound
after Dr. Shaw enlarged it in order to clean and debride it--see 6 H 88; before he did that it, it was 1.5 cm wide). As a matter of fact, Tom Graves said the bullet was tumbling in a recent reply to me:
What's the probability that your beloved testers were able to perfectly reenact CE-399's trajectory, angles of incidence, and velocity, etc., not to mention what it did after it exited JFK's throat and started tumbling (which we know from the Haags experiments viewable in "Cold Case JFK" and the oblong entry wound in JBC's back) so as to be able to recreate perfectly the way it was tumbling and twirling when it side-swiped JBC's radial bone?
Anyway, the damage inside Connally’s chest also disproves a sideways hit. According to Dr. Shaw, who operated on Connally's chest wound, the bullet created a "small tunneling wound" (7 HSCA 149) and he noted "the neat way in which it stripped the rib out without doing much damage to the muscles that lay on either side of it" (4 H 116). The wound's dimensions and the damage inside Connally's chest indicate the bullet hit Connally at a slight angle and was not tumbling or markedly yawing.
https://history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htmhttps://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/Breakability/Breakability.htm Cotton wad used to stop the bullet vs running out of energy.
Uh, no, wrong. The WC SBT test included firing bullets into a tube of cotton wadding. You don't know what you're talking about, as usual.
No exit wound on JFK.
I've already answered this argument, but you just keep repeating it. Again, bullets often do not leave the body. This happens rather frequently. The Parkland doctors saw clear indications that the throat bullet ranged downward into JFK's chest.
If you don't know anything about the subject maybe don't post on the thread.
LOL! You're the one who has repeatedly proved you don't even have a handle on the basics of the case.
But, now that Tom Graves knows that no SBT test has validated the SBT, he dismisses all the tests because he doesn't think they included the speculation that the bullet was tumbling when it hit Connally's back!
Are you guys ever going to bring yourselves to face the fact that we know that no bullet could have exited the shirt slits because there was no hole in the tie? The FBI knew that releasing all the tie photos would destroy the SBT, which is why they so doggedly resisted releasing them for years.