The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish  (Read 55502 times)

Offline Dr Alan Howard Davis

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #196 on: August 16, 2025, 10:50:26 PM »
No.

CE-567 and CE-569 alone tell you that the shot which struck the President in the head was fired from Oswald's rifle.  This is completely unrelated to the SBT.

To correct your statement, 567 & 569 themselves would fry Oswald.

Sorry Bill, but that just isn't true.  If it was, there would have been no need for the manipulation of the autopsy sketch showing the back of his head intact, instead of revealing an obvious exit wound

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #197 on: August 17, 2025, 12:15:21 AM »

  The claim has always been that ALL 3 shots came from the same Carcano Rifle, fired from the same window.  And now right here on this forum we have people wanting to separate the SBT from the other 2 shots in order to send Oswald to the gallows?  What we are now seeing with Old School JFK Researchers wanting to separate the 3 shots, and lengthen the elapsed firing time for the 3 shots, and relocate the JFK Limo on Elm St, is the imploding of the LN Theory. Knott Lab Forensic SCIENCE has the Old Guard Research Community now running away from the SBT.   

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #198 on: August 17, 2025, 12:22:30 AM »
Sorry Bill, but that just isn't true. If it was, there would have been no need for the manipulation of the autopsy sketch showing the back of his head intact, instead of revealing an obvious exit wound

How many of those red pills did you take, anyway?

Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #199 on: August 17, 2025, 06:57:48 AM »
How many of those red pills did you take, anyway?




Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #200 on: August 17, 2025, 11:36:50 AM »



Thanks for posting this Zapruder frame.

It gives us a very good view of how JFK's skull above and forward of his right ear exploded outward from the bullet that hit him in the back of the head.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2025, 01:32:03 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #201 on: August 17, 2025, 04:58:20 PM »

Thanks for posting this Zapruder frame.

It gives us a very good view of how JFK's skull above and forward of his right ear exploded outward from the bullet that hit him in the back of the head.

   It is still frames such as this that reinforce the Parkland Hospital Dr's observations of JFK only minutes after the assassination. So here we see the Flap hanging Down next to JFK's ear along with "something" stretching Up well over the Top of his head. Even a layman could Not miss seeing this 1963 cartoonish Special Effect. And I am not even going to get into the Black Shadow stretching across the back of his head from top-to-bottom. As we see clearer and clearer images of the Zapruder Film, the more it becomes obvious this $150,000 "film" has no evidentiary value. The Parkland Dr's observations totally discredit this intentionally distorted visual.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2025, 11:36:52 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #202 on: August 17, 2025, 10:39:16 PM »
No.

CE-567 and CE-569 alone tell you that the shot which struck the President in the head was fired from Oswald's rifle.  This is completely unrelated to the SBT.

To correct your statement, 567 & 569 themselves would fry Oswald.


A couple of things:

1) Please provide the WC ballistics report that demonstrates the matching rifling impressions for fragments CE-567 and CE-569, with the MC. Also, show us the report that the 2 fragments belonged to the same headshot bullet. While I acknowledge their claim of a match on both fragments, this is the WC we are talking about where Ford relocated the entry wound of CE-399 from the back to the neck.

2) If CE-567 and CE-569 are indeed 2 severely deformed fragments of the the same bullet that resulted in the catastrophic damage to JFK's head, then how do we reconcile this with the condition of CE-399, which penetrated JFK's T1 vertebra, as well as Connally's rib and wrist bones, appearing as though it had been fired into a swimming pool?

The WC agenda was clear. It only accepted evidence and testimony when it aligned with the LN narrative and rejected everything that didn't. Furthermore, how can the SBT remain tenable for you when it is clear that there is no valid trajectory from the sixth floor of the TSBD into JFK's back at T1 and out through his throat at C7? Even Ford acknowledged this inconsistency, which is why he relocated the back wound to the neck. However, even this adjustment did not elevate the plausibility of the SBT.

The only way for LNers to accept that Oswald was just a patsy and did not fire a shot at either JFK or Tippit is to bone up on logic and critical thinking, complemented by some understanding of physics. It only takes a bit of logic and 1 irrefutable fact to dismantle the LN argument, of which there are many. Once you establish this must have been a conspiracy it's game over. Instead, you refute all facts with denialism and mockery. Will you LNers ever learn? 
« Last Edit: August 17, 2025, 10:39:55 PM by Jack Trojan »