Walk me through this, curtain rod fans

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans  (Read 73203 times)

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2025, 01:07:11 AM »
In the 11/23/63 FBI report they say she believed it was "approximately 3 feet by 6 inches."

https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/randl_l1.htm

Great - I either didn't know that or had forgotten it. I was thinking of the visit a week or two later where Odum tried to replicate the sack with Frazier and Randle and she came up with the 27". The suspicion, I would think, would have to be that she was trying to make her story conform more closely to Frazier's. It seems surprising that she was then so adamant with the WC and that they didn't challenge her with her original estimate. I also see that on Odum's visit she emphasized the package being "heavy," which would seem an unlikely description for curtain rods. Since CTers are so emphatic about Frazier and Randle being "the only ones who actually saw the package," it's interesting how they conveniently ignore that Randle's original estimate, the day after the assassination, was right on the money.

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2025, 01:33:22 AM »
In Randle's WC testimony, she wants to shrink the bag even more by suddenly interjecting with the "27 last time" comment. And even a 27 inch bag would be too long for anybody Oswald's size to store it from armpit to cupped hand. I'm over 6 feet tall and I can barely get 24 inches in there.

I'm exactly 6 feet and have tried the experiment numerous times. I likewise can get about 25" in there. And why would anyone carry a wrapped package that way at all unless they were trying to make it as inconspicuous as possible?

Quote
My interpretation of Randle's testimony.

That has always been my interpretation as well, and I can easily carry a 40" golf club that way!

I'm not getting a lot of takers for my request to provide a plausible CT-oriented explanation. Is "plausible" the problem, as it so often seems to be? Gee, you folks are so quick to chime in when you think I'm giving insufficient weight to Frazier and Randle, but then when asked to provide a plausible explanation for curtain rods or any too-short package, you go silent. Now that it's been brought to my attention, be sure to address why Randle originally said the bag was 36" and why we should not "give more weight" to that estimate?

This thread, of course, is not really about curtain rods. As always, it's really about Conspiracy Think.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2025, 01:56:21 AM »
I'm exactly 6 feet and have tried the experiment numerous times. I likewise can get about 25" in there. And why would anyone carry a wrapped package that way at all unless they were trying to make it as inconspicuous as possible?

That has always been my interpretation as well, and I can easily carry a 40" golf club that way!

I'm not getting a lot of takers for my request to provide a plausible CT-oriented explanation. Is "plausible" the problem, as it so often seems to be? Gee, you folks are so quick to chime in when you think I'm giving insufficient weight to Frazier and Randle, but then when asked to provide a plausible explanation for curtain rods or any too-short package, you go silent. Now that it's been brought to my attention, be sure to address why Randle originally said the bag was 36" and why we should not "give more weight" to that estimate?

This thread, of course, is not really about curtain rods. As always, it's really about Conspiracy Think.


I've brought up the 3 foot bag which is instantly dismissed as an FBI alteration. -sigh-

Also Randle's description of the heavy looking bag which tapers towards the bulky bottom end is entirely consistent with a heavy rifle within, and hardly represents "curtain rods" but this bone jarring revelation is subsequently rejected for the "armpit to cupped hand" theory, which is ALWAYS the fall back.

Mr. BALL. I have one question, Mr. Chief Justice.
You used an expression there, that the bag appeared heavy.
Mrs. RANDLE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. You meant that there was some weight appeared to--
Mrs. RANDLE. To the bottom.
Mr. BALL. To the bottom?
Mrs. RANDLE. Yes. It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand. It was more bulky toward the bottom than it was this way.
Mr. BELIN. Toward the top? More bulky toward the bottom than toward the top?
Mrs. RANDLE. That is right.


JohnM

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #10 on: May 10, 2025, 02:06:36 AM »
Just so I don't mangle Greg Doudna's idea any further, here is the thread where he introduced it: https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/29747-a-new-look-at-paper-bags-curtain-rods-and-oswald/

Just his first post is beyond me, but maybe someone can parse it out. I'm really not interested in it unless someone wants to defend it as plausible. He also has another one involving a planted conspirator in the Beckley rooming house and a woman (in either the TSBD or Dal-Tex Building, I can't remember which) who falsely befriends Oswald.  ::)

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #11 on: May 10, 2025, 02:16:09 AM »
I've brought up the 3 foot bag which is instantly dismissed as an FBI alteration. -sigh-

You lost me there. Where was it instantly dismissed? Do you mean this is the standard CT dodge?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #12 on: May 10, 2025, 02:30:30 AM »
You lost me there. Where was it instantly dismissed? Do you mean this is the standard CT dodge?

Quote
Do you mean this is the standard CT dodge?

Yes. An alteration, a mistake or something to that effect.

- Why would Bookhout's second-hand account of what Randle said trump what she said directly?

JohnM

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Walk me through this, curtain rod fans
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2025, 02:45:30 AM »
I'm not getting a lot of takers for my request to provide a plausible CT-oriented explanation.

If Buell Wesley Frazier was a witting conspirator (preferably with just self-described Marxist and former sharpshooting Marine Lee Harvey Oswald to keep it nice and simple), he could have planned to say afterwards, if asked, "Gosh, Lee had told me the previous afternoon that he was gonna pick up some curtain rods from the Paine residence, and since the package looked to me to be only 24" to 28.5" in length when I kinda glanced at it over my shoulder and out of the corner of my eye real quick-like on the back seat of my car this morning, I figured that's what it was, especially after I asked him, 'What's in that twenty-four-inch to twenty-eight-and-a-half-inch-long package you put on the back seat before we got into my 1954 Chevy sedan, Lee?' and he said, 'Don't you remember, You Big Dummy, I told you yesterday TWENTY-FOUR TO TWENTY-EIGHT-AND-A-HALF-INCH-LONG CURTAIN RODS!!!!'"
« Last Edit: May 10, 2025, 02:52:52 AM by Tom Graves »