Two Wallets? Nope.

[John Iacoletti]

Your selective quoting of Rose is a typical CT tactic, here's the entire relevant quote where Oswald says his name is "Hidell", which for a start makes your conspiracy theory that Oswald never knew about the alias "Hidell" seriously flawed. LOL
So with the fact that Oswald admitted to the Hidell alias, there is really no need to continue because the only reason you are questioning the wallet is the Hidell ID which was provably in the Wallet and was connected to Oswald because Oswald himself admitted to "Hidell" LOL

"Cop said so", therefore "fact".  LOL.

By the way, this is the same Gus Rose who helped to frame Randall Dale Adams.

[John Iacoletti]

By the way, stating as a fact that the wallet must include a driver's license just because Bentley was listing simple generic terms for items often found inside a wallet (early reports which are often wrong) must mean one also believes a secret service agent was killed in Dealey Plaza (early reports) and that a cop was killed inside the theater (early reports).

It's hilarious the way that the LN-faithful appeal to "cop said so", until cop says something that doesn't fit.  Then it's "generic", or "figure of speech", or "early reports" or some other lame excuse.

[John Iacoletti]

What sort of individual(s) find(s) it a worthwhile and productive use of time to post virtually nothing but snarky, non-substantive one-liners on an obscure JFKA forum would certainly make for an interesting psychological study.

What does that say about the sort of individual who finds it a worthwhile and productive use of time to post virtually nothing but snarky, non-substantive, repetitive, lengthy screeds and strawman arguments along with egotistical bragging about himself on an obscure JFKA forum?

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  If "Martin" from "Europe" who doesn't understand the metric system wants to prove me wrong, how about addressing the significant problems noted with the individual possibilities? Or perhaps account what happened to Tippit's citation book?

How do you know Tippit had a "citation book"?

[John Iacoletti]

The Hidell ID was forensically analysed to be signed by Oswald, the template of the fake ID was found in Oswald's possessions and Oswald admitted to Rose that his "name" was Hidell.

"Forensically analysed".  LOL
"template of the fake ID".  LOL
"Oswald's possessions".  LOL
"admitted to Rose".  LOL

[John Iacoletti]

It is indeed classic Conspiracy Think. Every discrepancy becomes a "conspiracy fact" in the minds of these characters. If one witness says the car was purple, one says red and one says maroon - voila, three cars were fleeing from the scene and the routine hit-and-run becomes a mysterious conspiracy! These peoples' minds simply cannot be penetrated by rational thought. One can only observe the mysterious workings and marvel that they somehow function in the real world. It is ABSOLUTELY like attempting to discuss an issue with a Flat Earther, Fake Moon Landing fanatic, or any species of hardcore religious fundamentalist. Been there, done that. At some level, deep down, I have to believe they know they are spouting nonsense, but the desire to believe transcends rational thought.

"Rational thought" is LN-speak for making up contrived excuses to handwave away any and all contradictions and discrepancies in order to fit their faith-based narrative.

[John Iacoletti]

Yes, Frazier's testimony was what first alerted me to this CT game. The number of times he said "I really wasn't paying much attention" literally leaps off the page. Then we factor in the reality that there was utterly no reason for him to have been paying much attention. Yet it is now conspiracy gospel that Oswald was carrying a package tucked under his armpit that was too short to be the rifle.

And the LN game is to ignore what the only two witnesses to see the package said about it and go with "it must have contained a disassembled Carcano, because what else could it have been?"