That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

[John Corbett]

   SHANKS - I have proven that this is NOT Officer Haygood above. You claimed it was. Your current 0-4 record is sad to see.  How about you take a break, and gather your thoughts? Basically take a "Standing 8 count". I take no pleasure in pummeling someone that is "out" on their feet.

Your argument is silly in two ways. First of all, you haven't proven the officer is not Haygood. You have asserted it. You think because he had two gloves on in on photo precludes him from having taken on of the gloves off before the second photos was taken. Silly is as Silly does.

Second, even if the one gloved officer is not Haygood, that doesn't even come close to proving a conspiracy. You fail to consider the real possibility, actual the likelihood that it is another DPD officer whose name you don't know. Your failure to identify the officer is not proof of a conspiracy.

[Royell Storing]

Your argument is silly in two ways. First of all, you haven't proven the officer is not Haygood. You have asserted it. You think because he had two gloves on in on photo precludes him from having taken on of the gloves off before the second photos was taken. Silly is as Silly does.

Second, even if the one gloved officer is not Haygood, that doesn't even come close to proving a conspiracy. You fail to consider the real possibility, actual the likelihood that it is another DPD officer whose name you don't know. Your failure to identify the officer is not proof of a conspiracy.

   Where have you been? The timeline of Officer Harkness DQ's this being Officer Haygood walking toward and then by him in the Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness being in this Darnell still frame, means the time is 12:38 PM. At 12:38 PM, Officer Haygood is back at his motorcycle near the triple underpass conducting eyewitness interviews. This is a FACT that I have Proven.
   So YOU TELL ME: (1) Specifically, who is this Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film? (2) Where is his Motorcycle?

[Royell Storing]

I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 

    12:36 - Officer Harkness makes radio transmission that he is bringing an eyewitness/Amos Euins to the TSBD

    12:37 - Officer Harkness helps load Amos Euins into the car of Inspector Sawyer in front of the TSBD

    12:38 - Officer Harkness secures the back of the TSBD as instructed. This is where we see him above.

              At 12:38 PM, Motorcycle Officer Haygood was back at his motorcycle near the Triple Underpass. He was conducting eyewitness interviews. The motorcycle cop above is NOT Officer Haygood.  Who is this alleged Motorcycle Officer? Where did he come from?  Where is his Motorcycle?

[John Corbett]

   Where have you been? The timeline of Officer Harkness DQ's this being Officer Haygood walking toward and then by him in the Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness being in this Darnell still frame, means the time is 12:38 PM. At 12:38 PM, Officer Haygood is back at his motorcycle near the triple underpass conducting eyewitness interviews. This is a FACT that I have Proven.
   So YOU TELL ME: (1) Specifically, who is this Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film? (2) Where is his Motorcycle?

I don't need to answer those questions. You do. In the decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists such as yourself, one of their favorite ploys is to raise a question, and if the answer is an unknown, they think they have made the case for conspiracy. You don't prove anything by raising questions. You have to find answers to questions and then explain how the answer proves conspiracy. Instead, conspiracy hobbyists take the position that if an answer is unknown, that empowers them to assume the answer means there was a conspiracy. That is a totally illogical approach, but it leads conspiracy hobbyists to the answer they wanted from the start.

[Tommy Shanks]

I don't need to answer those questions. You do.

Royell Storing can't answer them because he's not capable of considering other explanations and instead has decided that there were imposter policemen wandering around Dealey Plaza. Just laughable stuff.

[Royell Storing]

I don't need to answer those questions. You do. In the decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists such as yourself, one of their favorite ploys is to raise a question, and if the answer is an unknown, they think they have made the case for conspiracy. You don't prove anything by raising questions. You have to find answers to questions and then explain how the answer proves conspiracy. Instead, conspiracy hobbyists take the position that if an answer is unknown, that empowers them to assume the answer means there was a conspiracy. That is a totally illogical approach, but it leads conspiracy hobbyists to the answer they wanted from the start.

    I see you guys no longer Challenge my PROVING this is Not Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is progress.
    NOW that you have accepted my having dispatched the erroneous Officer Haygood ID, there are obvious questions which follow. How about we now discuss the bona fides surrounding this Alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop? 

[Tommy Shanks]

    I see you guys no longer Challenge my PROVING this is Not Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is progress.
    NOW that you have accepted my having dispatched the erroneous Officer Haygood ID, there are obvious questions which follow. How about we now discuss the bona fides surrounding this Alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop?

You're delusional if you construe my responses, and those of other intelligent people here, as in any way supporting your imposter police officer poppycock.