That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

[Royell Storing]

I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 

    12:36 - Officer Harkness makes radio transmission that he is bringing an eyewitness/Amos Euins to the TSBD

    12:37 - Officer Harkness helps load Amos Euins into the car of Inspector Sawyer in front of the TSBD

    12:38 - Officer Harkness secures the back of the TSBD as instructed. This is where we see him above.

              At 12:38 PM, Motorcycle Officer Haygood was back at his motorcycle near the Triple Underpass. He was conducting eyewitness interviews. The motorcycle cop above is NOT Officer Haygood.  Who is this alleged Motorcycle Officer? Where did he come from?  Where is his Motorcycle?

[John Corbett]

   Where have you been? The timeline of Officer Harkness DQ's this being Officer Haygood walking toward and then by him in the Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness being in this Darnell still frame, means the time is 12:38 PM. At 12:38 PM, Officer Haygood is back at his motorcycle near the triple underpass conducting eyewitness interviews. This is a FACT that I have Proven.
   So YOU TELL ME: (1) Specifically, who is this Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film? (2) Where is his Motorcycle?

I don't need to answer those questions. You do. In the decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists such as yourself, one of their favorite ploys is to raise a question, and if the answer is an unknown, they think they have made the case for conspiracy. You don't prove anything by raising questions. You have to find answers to questions and then explain how the answer proves conspiracy. Instead, conspiracy hobbyists take the position that if an answer is unknown, that empowers them to assume the answer means there was a conspiracy. That is a totally illogical approach, but it leads conspiracy hobbyists to the answer they wanted from the start.

[Tommy Shanks]

I don't need to answer those questions. You do.

Royell Storing can't answer them because he's not capable of considering other explanations and instead has decided that there were imposter policemen wandering around Dealey Plaza. Just laughable stuff.

[Royell Storing]

I don't need to answer those questions. You do. In the decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists such as yourself, one of their favorite ploys is to raise a question, and if the answer is an unknown, they think they have made the case for conspiracy. You don't prove anything by raising questions. You have to find answers to questions and then explain how the answer proves conspiracy. Instead, conspiracy hobbyists take the position that if an answer is unknown, that empowers them to assume the answer means there was a conspiracy. That is a totally illogical approach, but it leads conspiracy hobbyists to the answer they wanted from the start.

    I see you guys no longer Challenge my PROVING this is Not Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is progress.
    NOW that you have accepted my having dispatched the erroneous Officer Haygood ID, there are obvious questions which follow. How about we now discuss the bona fides surrounding this Alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop? 

[Tommy Shanks]

    I see you guys no longer Challenge my PROVING this is Not Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is progress.
    NOW that you have accepted my having dispatched the erroneous Officer Haygood ID, there are obvious questions which follow. How about we now discuss the bona fides surrounding this Alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop?

You're delusional if you construe my responses, and those of other intelligent people here, as in any way supporting your imposter police officer poppycock.

[Royell Storing]

You're delusional if you construe my responses, and those of other intelligent people here, as in any way supporting your imposter police officer poppycock.

   So PROVE me wrong. That is the challenge I have issued. See the title of this thread?  What are you waiting for? A bandwagon to jump on? A "back" for you to slap? Again, you have been here a long, long, time. Yet YOU, all by yourself, have done nothing. You like to "pot shot" others, but are afraid of having likewise done toward anything that YOU might Originate.
   Somebody should have been exposed you a long time ago. Either proffer something of your own or put a sock in it.   

[John Corbett]

    I see you guys no longer Challenge my PROVING this is Not Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is progress.
    NOW that you have accepted my having dispatched the erroneous Officer Haygood ID, there are obvious questions which follow. How about we now discuss the bona fides surrounding this Alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop?

We do not accept your claims of proof. It is an empty claim by you. We have no burden to disprove something you have never proven.