Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!  (Read 55356 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8181
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #70 on: April 14, 2022, 12:34:58 AM »
I wouldn't worry about it, there was a time on this Forum when odd sentences or phrases would be substituted for certain words. And what was added is hardly a reason to alert the authorities, but I guess when the CT's arguments are as weak as piss, then they will resort to almost anything to gain an advantage.

JohnM

You seem to be familiar with this kind of behavior. Why is that?

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #71 on: April 14, 2022, 12:53:52 AM »

   Unless I clicked on something wrong, I was responding to what you said to me on page 8, post #8 from the top, by yourself.


You've just not added the quote symbols when you responded.
It happens all the time.

Only a truly spineless f%ckwit would report such a thing.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #72 on: April 14, 2022, 01:44:07 AM »
You seem to be familiar with this kind of behavior. Why is that?

What "kind of behavior" would that be, Martin?   Why are you asking John Mytton such a question? You seem to get your kicks at taking comments that people post and using them as a vehicle for you to take cheap shots at people like John Mytton who has done some outstanding work with gif's, photos, and films, trying to help people be able to see things that aren't always easy to see due to camera movement and such.   Let me ask you.   Could you point me in the direction of something you've done in here that is considered outstand research/work?   I'd like to see it, seriously.   

 All I did was respond in kind to Mando that I was mistaken in saying what I said about the fragments removed from Gov. Connally's wrist.   Mondo made a comment about what I said in response to something he said.  My response was WRONG, I misspoke, and so I pointed out that I was wrong.  Here is the exchange which is on page 8, 8 comment from the top: 

 Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #77 on: April 12, 2022, 10:53:32 PM »
ReplyQuote
Quote from: Steve Barber on April 12, 2022, 04:40:38 PM
He's basing that on something that was disproved by yours truly.  The acoustics evidence was a lie perpetrated upon the American people by the scientsis that worked for the HSCA.  There are no gunshots on the Dictabelt recording whatsoever.  There is also no evidence of a gunshot to President Kennedy's head from the knoll.  Had there been, the left hemisphere and the skull damage would be apparent in the 3 home movie films that captured the fatal shot. And, as conspiracy theorist Robert B. Cutler said it best:  "There would have been absolutely nothing left of the skull had two shots struck the skull", and there is no evidence of any large skull fragments flying anywhere but forward, based on the three films, the x-ray or the autopsy pictures--not to mention the fact that the left hemisphere of the brain was intact.

Mondo posted this:

 Quote:  "You also believe (quote) "grains of lead that were recovered from Connally's wounds  were matched to that bullet" even though there is no valid scientific study that supports this conclusion.

Do you also believe in the Tooth Fairy?"  Quote Off.

 
 So, I responded to Mondo, saying this:  Quote :  " Sorry.  I misspoke.  At my age, the memory just isn't what it once was.  I hope this doesn't happen to you if you reach this age."
 
 Then, I think it was earlier today-- I saw where I didn't answer his question "Do you believe in the tooth fairy?, so, I clicked on wherever I was reading that from, and said the words "No, do you?  I've messed up somewhere, and I don't know how, but somehow, I messed up something.

  I honestly do remember what color his comment to me was when I responded to what he said--and I am not in this Forum enough to remember how everything works anymore.  (I think Duncan knows But I'm not certain) how little I'm here anymore compared to how I used to post comments several years ago).  What I cannot figure out is, where is my original comment of " " Sorry.  I misspoke.  At my age, the memory just isn't what it once was.  I hope this doesn't happen to you if you reach this age.".  It isn't here, and I posted it, but I do not see it anywhere except within the blue background response.  I'm confused, literally.   But the point is, I didn't initially say anything disrespectful to Mondo within my response to him.  Maybe Duncan can jump in here and help clear this up.  I'm at a loss, and I'm dreadfully sorry Duncan for this mess. 

 
« Last Edit: April 14, 2022, 02:32:35 AM by Steve Barber »

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #73 on: April 14, 2022, 01:59:21 AM »
You've just not added the quote symbols when you responded.
It happens all the time.

Only a truly spineless f%ckwit would report such a thing.

 Thank you so much, Dan!!!!   Now I know what I did wrong.  Its a relief finding out I haven't lost my (failing) mind completely.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #74 on: April 14, 2022, 02:12:39 AM »
Thank you so much, Dan!!!!   Now I know what I did wrong.  Its a relief finding out I haven't lost my (failing) mind completely.

It's easily done.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!
« Reply #76 on: April 14, 2022, 11:15:33 PM »
An innocent error of accidentally putting a reply inside the quote tags.  Nothing to get worked up about.