Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!If everything was so up and up with that film...
If everything was so up and up with that film...
Why was it suppressed and lied about for so many years?
Seriously?John Mytton seems to come on routinely as the chief cook and bottle washer around here.
If everything was so up and up with that film...
Why was it suppressed and lied about for so many years?
(https://i.ibb.co/QMqNWM3/ezgif-com-resize-137.gif) (https://ibb.co/Pgbh2gv)
(https://i.ibb.co/QXKP8nb/ezgif-com-crop-53.gif) (https://ibb.co/DLR9GkV)
:D :D :Di think i see the event on the horizon and stuff
You really need to have a break.
I wish there was an appropriate pareidolia thread in the audiovisual forum for Maxwell to post in.\
:D :D :D
You really need to have a break.
Anthony Davison’s work is good... but it does not address anomalies in the background... that cannot be explained by Zapruder getting the jitters, etc...
This is what I think demands an explanation...
Look at the two frames from an 1) HD slo-mo version... and from 2) Geraldo’s 1975 first public showing of Zapruder...
NOTE: How little the limo moves forward... and how FAST the background shifts...
How is this best explained?
(https://i.ibb.co/zf3QJ0K/ezgif-com-resize-138.gif) (https://ibb.co/cTWkL7z)
(https://i.ibb.co/Ykb9Q0k/ezgif-com-resize-139.gif) (https://ibb.co/Z8NsX28)
Yes...
Does this mean that several frames of the wall across the street are missing, never seen?
Life Magazine damaged their copy of the film which is probably the original source of of the two clips you posted. But the original Zapruder in camera version has been transferred and that's why we don't see the big jump as in your version and the unedited Zapruder film is what seen in Anthony's video.
JohnM
proof that the Zapruder film is 100% AuthenticYeah, but which copy?
Yeah, but which copy?
https://i.servimg.com/u/f35/17/60/28/90/scree628.jpg
Oh BTW... click image for a full page view ;)
I don't know what the heck you are trying to prove?
The original Zapruder Film is authentic and has been verified as a camera original by The Kodak Expert, Zavada! And as expected the copies which were copied from copies over time have slight colour, quality, etc variations. Big Deal!
Btw is there any Kook theories that you don't endorse?
...is there any Kook theories that you don't endorse?Yeah....yours.
Is Zapruder 100% Authentic...? It could be...
However, the film can be authentic, but also distorted and purposely overlaid with images to cover critical areas that might reveal something significant...
I see what I consider to be evidence of compressing images that distort them and make them very difficult to recognize...
Hi Jake, if the film frames are "distorted and purposely overlaid with images to cover critical areas" then that by definition must mean that the hundreds of images that you have posted with mysterious snipers all over Dealey Plaza must be a product of pareidolia, yes?
Btw please stop posting your images in this thread! Thanks in advance.
JohnM
Looks like Dick and Julie to everybody else. Your buddies are cringing again... ::)
Looks like Dick and Julie to everybody else.
Your buddies are cringing again...
Going through my collection I found some interesting graphics that prove all sorts of things.
This autopsy photo showing the irregular torn scalp matches the same injury as seen in the Moorman photo.
(https://i.postimg.cc/L59BncHv/matching-Moorman-with-autopsy-photo.gif)
This forensic simulation using a replica ballistic head demonstrates a similar result to what is seen in Zapruder.
(https://i.postimg.cc/fLxDz6Fy/6thfloorsimulationgif.gif)
For any rational sane person the fact that the Nix film shows the exact same event from a completely different perspective proves the Zapruder film is 100% authentic!
(https://i.postimg.cc/qqbczZ6V/quick-jerk-h-GIFSoupcom.gif)
(https://i.postimg.cc/9fbcWQG0/Nix-and-Zapruder.gif) (https://postimages.org/)
The first eyewitnesses who saw the assassination from right up close ALL describe the exact same expulsion of matter as seen in the authenticated Zapruder Film.
(https://i.postimg.cc/JzPxZ4yJ/Dealey-plaza-first-eyewitnesses.gif)
In the centre frame in this Gif right next to Jackie's left shoulder, a piece of brain/skull is seen hurtling towards the floor.
(https://i.postimg.cc/8k4gZBg2/312-315headbonestableresized.gif)
(https://i.postimg.cc/hvnzjT0B/limo-2a.jpg)
The blood spray dissipation seen in this hunting video is replicated in the Zapruder film.
(https://i.postimg.cc/TwZC17K4/Blood-spray-dissipation-zapruder.gif)
JohnM
John,
In 2004, I sent this information about the large piece of skull that we see in Z-314 past Mrs. Kennedy, landing on the top of the seat occupied by Mrs. Connally which then bounces off her seat and falls toward the floor. He made this .gif showing a blow up of the skull fragment in action:
https://paulseaton.com/jfk/frags/bounce.htm
Thanks Steve, I never noticed that before and I have to agree that the piece next to the arrow must be the same piece as seen in Z314. This is undeniable graphic evidence that the shot came from behind and blew the matter forward.
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
JohnM
Thanks Steve, I never noticed that before and I have to agree that the piece next to the arrow must be the same piece as seen in Z314. This is undeniable graphic evidence that the shot came from behind and blew the matter forward.
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
Hi John,
Thank you, and You're very welcome. I'm glad I could be of some help.
JohnM
Amazing Steve, never seen that myself.
Some brilliant graphics from the both you and John.
And the backward head movement is from...WHAT exactly??
Once again...the 100% authentic grainy, blurry and jumpy as hell 8 tiny mm film where the arrow is pointing is showing what could be one of the roses. Look around at all the other roses doing the same bouncing----
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
Once again...the 100% authentic grainy, blurry and jumpy as hell 8 tiny mm film where the arrow is pointing is showing what could be one of the roses. Look around at all the other roses doing the same bouncing----
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
I also fail to see boogie men in the bushes. The film shows me that there was an obvious ambush there and shooters could have been anywhere.
And the backward head movement is from...WHAT exactly??
Roses are red......and violets are blue-
Mytton did not say to quit posting here. He can't do that.
I will stop posting in this thread as you request ...
..and violets are blue-
Mytton's never wrong
I mean hell... just ask you.
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
The arrow points to a rose I believe because just to the left of that it is a fuller bloom and to the left of that one is also a rose I believe because it looks just like the flower with the arrow. But probably not enough people look at your crap to care anyway.
Mytton's never wrong
The arrow points to a rose...
Thumb1:
A rose with a shiny specular highlight? Yeah whatever!
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
JohnM
..and violets are blue-
Mytton's never wrong
I mean hell... just ask you.
(https://i.postimg.cc/cJR17gn9/zapruder-bb-2.gif)
The arrow points to a rose I believe because just to the left of that it is a fuller bloom and to the left of that one is also a rose I believe because it looks just like the flower with the arrow. But probably not enough people look at your crap to care anyway.
Since when do roses have square edges and pointed?(https://cdn.atwilltech.com/flowerdatabase/t/two-dozen-red-roses-vase-arrangement-5d6723cea399b.425.jpg)
It is not a rose by any stretchThen what is it? And where is the proof?
As far as your remark to John Mytton...your disrespect for his posting some very helpful gif's is unwarranted.
John Mytton is very disrespectful to other posters and has never admitted that he is ever wrong about anything.
John Mytton is very disrespectful to other posters
and has never admitted that he is ever wrong about anything.
Hi John, the object in question is clearly rotating as it falls out of view. As it rotates we get to see it's sides and it's edges.
Do you have a good copy, close-up, from the head shot to the point we are seeing in the above clip. There appears to be a large piece of skull blown forward at the moment of impact and I just want to see how it relates to the rotating object in the above clip.
No, I just tell it like it is and if your goofball theories require evidence and logic as refutation then by golly I'll be there to give you a helping hand.
Why post something that is wrong in the first place?, I stick to the truth and it's done me well so far!
JohnM
WOW, to find Weidman at any time 24 hours a day all I gotta do is post here and this time in around 15 minutes here he is responding with all the vile and venom he can muster.
It looks like the lifestyle of this rich and famous Lear Jetter simply revolves around me. Nice!
JohnM
OMG I said that Weidmann was infatuated with me, now he's obsessed with where I live and the time I post, what's next?, maybe he'll come to Australia and try and meet me again? LMFAO!
JohnM
I couldn't care less what time you post
Vs
Says the guy who hasn't got anything better to do than start the day (it's 8:30 AM in Sydney) posting on a JFK forum.
JohnM
(https://i.postimg.cc/P5jn9wV6/Z314a.jpg)
JohnM
(https://i.postimg.cc/P5jn9wV6/Z314a.jpg)
JohnM
I just tell it like it is and if your goofball theories require evidence and logic as refutation then by golly I'll be there to give you a helping hand.::) Right.
After two head shots how much head would be left?
JohnM
Hi John, I meant a video clip, close-up and your usual high quality, from the moment of the headshot to the moment after the piece of skull has rotated out of view.
I'd do it myself but my video suite is down at the moment.
Thanks in advance
This video isn't stabilized and as good as Steve's Gif but does show the timing of the ejection to when the "rose" tumbled down the inside of the car.
(https://i.postimg.cc/fyY3wN5N/Z308-327b.gif)
JohnM
What's this????? You mean you are unaware of the fact that Mark Lane heavily edited out details regarding the details Brehm gave Lane about what he witnessed that day?! You are completely unaware that the transcripts of the interviews of the people Lane interviewed are complete and unedited and housed in Wisconsin at the Wisconsin Historical Society? Mr. Brehm's complete, unedited interview on transcript is labeled: "USMss, 117AN “Rush to Judgment” Box 60, Folder 1" . The entire story about the "Whatever it was" that he saw which he himself never said was a piece of "skull", according to what he says in the unedited interview. Many of Mr. Brehm's actions and observations were edited out of the film, conveniently, because he points out that what he thought he saw -HE did not identify as a piece of skull--Seymour Weitzman did when it was found in the street-and Lane mentioned Weitzman because Brehm said that he himself would never have been able to identify it as a piece of skull. You'd better get busy and write the WHS and ask for a copy of Mr. Brehm's unedited and complete interview with Lane. Then you'll realize what a shyster Lane was, and why Mr. Brehm blasted Lane during his appearance in 1967 on the CBS News Inquiry: The Warren Report, saying that Lane took great liberties at adding to his quotation, and that he positively identified the object as a piece of skull, when he did no such thing! Look the place up on the Internet, and while you're at it, ask for a copy of Lee Bowers' complete and unedited interview, and see how Lane did the same thing to Bowers by editing out things Bowers said regarding the men and the stockade fence. Brehm also did not say that the "whatever it was" landed near where he stood.
So, in answer to your question, no, I do not believe in the tooth fairy, nor do I believe anything Mark Lane had to say when it comes to Chuck Brehm or Lee Bowers, and what they observed on 11/22/1963.
I also believe that you should actually be asking yourself if you believe in the tooth fairy. Anyone who believes that two bullets struck JFK in the head from two different directions and then believe that most of the head would still be intact...well, lets just say that you don't know the first thing about ballistics or forensics.
Unless I clicked on something wrong, I was responding to what you said to me on page 8, post #8 from the top, by yourself.
I wouldn't worry about it, there was a time on this Forum when odd sentences or phrases would be substituted for certain words. And what was added is hardly a reason to alert the authorities, but I guess when the CT's arguments are as weak as piss, then they will resort to almost anything to gain an advantage.
JohnM
Unless I clicked on something wrong, I was responding to what you said to me on page 8, post #8 from the top, by yourself.
You seem to be familiar with this kind of behavior. Why is that?
You've just not added the quote symbols when you responded.
It happens all the time.
Only a truly spineless f%ckwit would report such a thing.
Thank you so much, Dan!!!! Now I know what I did wrong. Its a relief finding out I haven't lost my (failing) mind completely.
It's easily done.
Thumb1:
An innocent error of accidentally putting a reply inside the quote tags. Nothing to get worked up about.
I have to go with Jerry Freeman post on the roses!
Going through my collection I found some interesting graphics that prove all sorts of things.
This autopsy photo showing the irregular torn scalp matches the same injury as seen in the Moorman photo.
(https://i.postimg.cc/L59BncHv/matching-Moorman-with-autopsy-photo.gif)
This forensic simulation using a replica ballistic head demonstrates a similar result to what is seen in Zapruder.
(https://i.postimg.cc/fLxDz6Fy/6thfloorsimulationgif.gif)
For any rational sane person the fact that the Nix film shows the exact same event from a completely different perspective proves the Zapruder film is 100% authentic!
(https://i.postimg.cc/qqbczZ6V/quick-jerk-h-GIFSoupcom.gif)
(https://i.postimg.cc/9fbcWQG0/Nix-and-Zapruder.gif) (https://postimages.org/)
The first eyewitnesses who saw the assassination from right up close ALL describe the exact same expulsion of matter as seen in the authenticated Zapruder Film.
(https://i.postimg.cc/JzPxZ4yJ/Dealey-plaza-first-eyewitnesses.gif)
In the centre frame in this Gif right next to Jackie's left shoulder, a piece of brain/skull is seen hurtling towards the floor.
(https://i.postimg.cc/8k4gZBg2/312-315headbonestableresized.gif)
(https://i.postimg.cc/hvnzjT0B/limo-2a.jpg)
The blood spray dissipation seen in this hunting video is replicated in the Zapruder film.
(https://i.postimg.cc/TwZC17K4/Blood-spray-dissipation-zapruder.gif)
JohnM
Doctoring of the Zapruder Film. Here is a prime example. If they can do this here, where else can they do it and make it ingeniously blend in? Note the flag and the waterspot just above it that turns to a fleshy color.
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1g-AYlHSXPNcFUI8ryWmn5a9KtpQ2zr2N) | (http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1kQ1X4OEUt5CU3A5LGOJKKquL5Qa_6RtE) |
Was this a film spice, a license plate splice or cutting or an obscurement or movement of people in the scene? Maybe the feet in the scene should have been at the waterspot and match their shadow?
Maybe they were just obscuring the license plate numbers so you couldn't trace them! Those definitely look like cut lines on Z225.
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1_DY-y0Q3rPOeYNEkfg6sNlrgBxWnvpzd) | (http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=14H46ftYNfsttUuNxnBOGifRGlrSscmaJ) |
Doctoring of the Zapruder Film. Here is a prime example. If they can do this here, where else can they do it and make it ingeniously blend in? Note the flag and the waterspot just above it that turns to a fleshy color. Was this a film spice, a license plate splice or cutting or an obscurement or movement of people in the scene? Maybe the feet in the scene should have been at the waterspot and match their shadow?
(https://i.postimg.cc/qvpVtRY0/z225.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/6pWgWP2p/z226.jpg)
Maybe they were just obscuring the license plate numbers so you couldn't trace them! Those definitely look like cut lines on Z225. Again, the background figures are hideous. They appear to be clapping. Well that could be, but they are also in the right place to make a presidential interception when JFK is right behind the sign and the first shot comes in. It would work great having everyone's attention fixed on Cuban and the umbrella man on the other side of the road! To make matters worse, those figures don't appear to be following the car with their gaze and the figure at the front quickly puts his hand directly behind his back. Must have had an itchy spot! Not sure what these characters were doing and who they were. Garry Unger's picks up some black in those frames. Anything cut or modified? Thanks to Garry Unger's Pictures! The others don't show the shadows! The stance doesn't match the body position either!
(https://i.postimg.cc/h4J7w42S/The-Zapruder-Film-mp4-snapshot-00-07-22-076.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/gkVySk0x/The-Zapruder-Film-mp4-snapshot-00-07-22-110.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/ncFMxHkj/The-Zapruder-Film-mp4-snapshot-00-07-22-276.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/8PcDws4H/The-Zapruder-Film-mp4-snapshot-00-07-22-610.jpg)
It would be interesting to see a gif zoomed on these characters!
John Mytton seems to come on routinely as the chief cook and bottle washer around here.
Yes...seriously.
Dan Rather was among the privileged few press correspondents that were given a private showing of the film back when it was solely in the hands of the Time-Life outfit. Few know what he reported..."Upon viewing the president's head shot---JFK could be seen slumping forward." Is that what we see in that film? Maybe he saw a different copy? ???
https://quixoticjoust.blogspot.com/2015/05/dan-rather-tales.html
By Linda Minor - May 28, 2022
"...Is it not a strange coincidence that Herskowitz, chosen to write Dan's book, The Camera Never Blinks, which was published in 1976, would later work for the Bush family? Perhaps not, considering the closeness of Prescott Bush to the CBS founder, William S. Paley. Consider this small detail from IMDb's biography of George H. W. Bush:
Prescott Bush (Yale 1917) made his fortune and name as an investment banker on Wall St., eventually becoming a partner of the white shoe brokerage Brown Bros. Harriman. He was a member of the Yale Corp., the principal governing body of Yale University, from 1944 to 1956 and was on the board of directors of the Columbia Broadcasting System (C.B.S.), after having been introduced to C.B.S. Chairman William Paley in 1932 by his friend and business partner [in investment bank, Brown Brothers Harriman] Averell Harriman, a major Democratic party power-broker.
C.D. Jackson, who headed Time, Inc., which owned Life magazine, had handled intelligence and propaganda assignments during WWII. In 1943 he was in Turkey for the State Department and Board of Economic Warfare before going to the Office of War Information with his friend William Paley. They were both assigned to Eisenhower’s command in Europe to operate the Psychological Warfare Branch of the Army.
After the 1952 election Jackson became Eisenhower’s special assistant for cold war planning and, while on leave from Fortune, a Luce publication, he handled clandestine propaganda operations in Eastern Europe within the National Committee for a Free Europe. He also participated in the report prepared by William Harding Jackson (no relation), which resulted in reorganizing Truman’s Psychological Strategy Board into a new “Operations Coordinating Board” within the National Security Council. [See Michael S. Mayer, The Eisenhower Years (2009).]
Walter Cronkite had been placed in charge of the CBS Evening News in 1962. Also a Texan, Cronkite had graduated from San Jacinto High School in Houston in 1933 before attending the University of Texas for just over two years, dropping out in 1935. ...
:DThis is the first time that i have seen any mention that the Zapruder footage shows that chunk of spinning skull. Made my day. Good job.
The larger piece of skull seems to be a match to the Limo skull gif.
(https://i.ibb.co/8Pr1qR3/Triangular-skull-fragment.jpg)
When someone explains the technical indications of alteration in the Zapruder film, then we can proceed from there. But so far the film's defenders have been unable to explain those indications.
And then there's the impossibly fast movement of Brehm's son, which has been discussed in detail. I continue to challenge anyone to do a reenactment with a child of the same approximate height and weight and show that those movements can be carried out in the time they are done in the film. It's impossible. I tried with one of my sons. He could not even come close to duplicating those movements in the required amount of time.
Look, until someone comes up with some rational, plausible explanations for the physical impossibilities that the current Z film contains, no one can credibly claim that the film has been proved authentic.
When you point out some of these impossibilities to the film's defenders, they usually claim that they just don't see them in the first place, such as the impossibly fast movement of Brehm's son.
When someone explains the technical indications of alteration in the Zapruder film, then we can proceed from there. But so far the film's defenders have been unable to explain those indications.
And then there's the impossibly fast movement of Brehm's son, which has been discussed in detail. I continue to challenge anyone to do a reenactment with a child of the same approximate height and weight and show that those movements can be carried out in the time they are done in the film. It's impossible. I tried with one of my sons. He could not even come close to duplicating those movements in the required amount of time.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zv2ZBwL7/Brehm-Zaprudera.gif)
(John Mytton)
It seems us LNers, like John Mytton, Jerry Organ and myself, are limited by our inability to see things that aren’t there. I can assure you, at least for myself, I really don’t see any ‘impossibly fast’ movement from Charles Brehm’s son. I’m not pretending I don’t. I just don’t see it.
Questions for Michael T. Griffith:
Exactly, what is it about Charles Brehm’s son’s motion that is impossibly fast? The speed his torso moves? His arms speed? His hands speed? What?
Which post have you discussed this in detail before?
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0008.jpg) | (https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0009.jpg) | |
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1j4PIpNCtZbphz0kmWxmCckNi3vDlG5He) | ||
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0010.jpg) | (https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0011.jpg) | |
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1j4PIpNCtZbphz0kmWxmCckNi3vDlG5He) | ||
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0012.jpg) | (https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ZMN2_frame_0013.jpg) |
I am wondering the same thing, Joe. I watched this Z film clip provided by Jerry, and then I went to watch it in the Marie Muchmore film, and I see nothing indicating any "Impossibly fast" movement by Joe Brehm either. I also noticed as the limousine passes him, Chuck Brehm leans to his left as the car passes, putting his weight on his left leg, and this is all occurring as Joe Brehm steps out from behind his dad. But, I agree with you. Nothing "Impossibly fast" regarding Joe Brehm stepping out from behind his dad at all.
When someone explains the technical indications of alteration in the Zapruder film, then we can proceed from there. But so far the film's defenders have been unable to explain those indications.
And then there's the impossibly fast movement of Brehm's son, which has been discussed in detail. I continue to challenge anyone to do a reenactment with a child of the same approximate height and weight and show that those movements can be carried out in the time they are done in the film. It's impossible. I tried with one of my sons. He could not even come close to duplicating those movements in the required amount of time.
When someone explains the technical indications of alteration in the Zapruder film, then we can proceed from there. But so far the film's defenders have been unable to explain those indications.
And then there's the impossibly fast movement of Brehm's son, which has been discussed in detail. I continue to challenge anyone to do a reenactment with a child of the same approximate height and weight and show that those movements can be carried out in the time they are done in the film. It's impossible. I tried with one of my sons. He could not even come close to duplicating those movements in the required amount of time.
It seems us LNers, like John Mytton, Jerry Organ and myself, are limited by our inability to see things that aren’t there. I can assure you, at least for myself, I really don’t see any ‘impossibly fast’ movement from Charles Brehm’s son. I’m not pretending I don’t. I just don’t see it.
Questions for Michael T. Griffith:
Exactly, what is it about Charles Brehm’s son’s motion that is impossibly fast? The speed his torso moves? His arms speed? His hands speed? What?
Which post have you discussed this in detail before?
Like showing Charles Brehm’s son moving with impossible speed. Or showing Jean Hill and Mary Moorman standing on the grass when both had really stepped onto the road. None of these alleged alterations make any sense. Why would they have made them? This is a question that is never addressed.
Oh, boy. You are years behind the information curve. Have you heard about the group of Hollywood film experts who have identified numerous indications of alteration in the Zapruder film? Have you looked at David Mantik and Doug Horne's presentations on clear, compelling evidence of alteration?
Here's just one indication for you: In the Z film, the cloud of blood and brain matter disappears far too quickly, impossibly quickly. Tests have proved that this cloud should have remained visible for at least six frames, but it vanishes in less than two frames. That is physically impossible.
The speed of the particles and droplets has to be taken into account. In the time that z313 was exposed-25 ms-some of the parts of the cloud had travelled 3 feet. In another 5 full frames or 275 ms. they would have gone 33 feet farther. (We know that brain and blood covered the car hood). The cloud did not go away. It just expanded rapidly and no longer look like a cloud.
Here's just one indication for you: In the Z film, the cloud of blood and brain matter disappears far too quickly, impossibly quickly. Tests have proved that this cloud should have remained visible for at least six frames, but it vanishes in less than two frames. That is physically impossible.
Oh, boy. You are years behind the information curve. Have you heard about the group of Hollywood film experts who have identified numerous indications of alteration in the Zapruder film? Have you looked at David Mantik and Doug Horne's presentations on clear, compelling evidence of alteration?
Here's just one indication for you: In the Z film, the cloud of blood and brain matter disappears far too quickly, impossibly quickly. Tests have proved that this cloud should have remained visible for at least six frames, but it vanishes in less than two frames. That is physically impossible.
If by Hollywood, you mean Ollie Stone, forget it. Mantik and Horne are fruitcakes.I wouldn't call you a fruitcake... mainly because there is no apparent presence of berries.. nuts..or any such produce that is otherwise palatable.
Oh, boy. You are years behind the information curve. Have you heard about the group of Hollywood film experts who have identified numerous indications of alteration in the Zapruder film? Have you looked at David Mantik and Doug Horne's presentations on clear, compelling evidence of alteration?
Here's just one indication for you: In the Z film, the cloud of blood and brain matter disappears far too quickly, impossibly quickly. Tests have proved that this cloud should have remained visible for at least six frames, but it vanishes in less than two frames. That is physically impossible.
Oh, boy. You are years behind the information curve. Have you heard about the group of Hollywood film experts who have identified numerous indications of alteration in the Zapruder film? Have you looked at David Mantik and Doug Horne's presentations on clear, compelling evidence of alteration?
Here's just one indication for you: In the Z film, the cloud of blood and brain matter disappears far too quickly, impossibly quickly. Tests have proved that this cloud should have remained visible for at least six frames, but it vanishes in less than two frames. That is physically impossible.
I take it you haven't heard about the numerous Hollywood film experts who examined logarithmic color scans from a 35 mm negative of the Zapruder film and concluded there are black patches or crude animations that obscure the back of JFK's head?
I don't think that film was altered.
It shows enough that should convince anyone that the major wound to the head was just like most folks described as they saw it.
JFK was struck between the right eye and the right ear.
Perhaps an instant before that shot was a bullet square to the back of the head that caused a slight forward bob.
It is a wonder that the film wasn't "LOST".
(https://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z317.jpg)
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1S-vVZ5DytkKdir6Fu7FrlPrclVI9Rxjb)
With the "Devil's Ear" hinged bone flap closed, the gaping area was a bit above the right ear and reached to the apex. It was also largely rearward from a line drawn (anatomical-vertical) ear-to-ear over the apex.