So the lunchroom encounter was invented?
So essentially it was invented, because it never actually happened.
Mr Baxter, please don't ask a new question and then quote my answer to an older one as though I am answering your new one.
You asked me: "you're suggesting the meeting was totally made up?". And I responded to
that question with: "No---------------it was relocated". Because there was a meeting between these three, only at the front door. Therefore the meeting was not totally made up, just its location (and therefore its timing).
But it was a story. It was made up.
You can't say that it's totally acceptable to lie about the most significant aspect of the story (i.e. the location of the meeting) but then go on to say they couldn't possibly lie about the time it took to get to the second floor.
Of course they could lie about the time it took to get to the second floor. But the lie needed to be someway realistic-sounding.
They could just have said that they encountered several other employees on the way up which they had to clear and that delayed them slightly.
Why would an officer who has rushed into the building in under 30 seconds in the belief that shots have just been fired from the top of that building have cause to clear anyone on the first floor? Makes no sense
And why would Oswald being on the second floor after 90 seconds appear to make him more guilty? Surely the natural instinct of a guilty person would in fact be to try and exit the building as soon as possible, not stop on the 2nd floor to casually have a sip of Coke? Why, if it was all just a story, did they not say they encountered him coming down the stairwell?
Which stairwell (i.e. between which floors)?
I just don't get all these claims about purposely making up stories to over up a conspiracy.
I don't get your confusion, Mr Baxter. They knew Mr Oswald had been at the front entrance for the encounter and they needed to relocate the encounter to somewhere less disastrous
