Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ?  (Read 137985 times)

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #190 on: October 22, 2021, 07:08:36 PM »
It is difficult to ascertain the absolute identity of the man with the open shirt and his activity. However...it does not gel with the time of either the bus/cab report or the observation of a sheriff's deputy claiming he saw Oswald enter a car heading west on Elm right after the shots. Either direction could lead southwesterly toward the theater.

Appreciate the helpful tidbit, Mr. Freeman, that either direction--further down on Elm Street towards the Triple Underpass and/or use of the Houston Street route--eventually intersects with the Texas Theatre. Either option is well within less than 5 minutes away. That said, where I respect your assertion, quote, It is difficult to ascertain the absolute identity of the man with the open shirt. unquote, there's only one single person that afternoon in that plaza at that time that matches the physique of the wrongly-accused, the identical colours of his clothing from top to bottom, and dressed in the same manner as described or demonstrated by three different individuals (Mr. Mentesana's home film; Mr. Brewer and, of course, Ms. Postal). One captures the shirttails worn out, and the other two describe the same shirt colour worn out.

IF you have some time on your hands, take a look at some video material of the wrongly-accused passing out leaflets down in New Orleans. Note his mannerisms, his stance, and compare with his actions--as noted in Mr. Mentesana's home movie film. I'm using a public-computer at the moment, thus am not privy to all of my archived footage of his staged activities down in New Orleans, but here's something--courtesy of Mr. Morrisette's channel-- I just found on Youtube ---->


It's him in Mr. Mentesana's home movie; then same shirt worn in same manner as noted by Mr. Brewer; and, with a natural hat-trick evidenced via carbon-copy by Ms. Postal's observations as well at the Texas Theatre. The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody. He was in Dealey Plaza loooong after the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure wanted us to believe. Again, it's him.

« Last Edit: October 22, 2021, 08:16:49 PM by Alan J. Ford »

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #191 on: October 22, 2021, 07:11:30 PM »
Most likely being escorted with the distance between them. Hard to say for sure.

An astute and fair assessment there, Mr. Plant, no great surprise considering the keen discernment of the source.

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #192 on: October 22, 2021, 07:21:31 PM »
It's him: Aligning her own observations with those of both Mr. Mentesana & Mr. Brewer even further, Ms. Postal goes on to confirm in even more detail their previously shared specifics regarding how the same brown coloured shirt was worn ---->

Mr. Ball. Outside his pants?
Mrs. Postal. Uh-huh.
Mr. Ball. Wasn't tucked into his pants?
Mrs. Postal. Huh-uh.
Mr. Ball. When he went in was it tucked in his pants when he went in?
Mrs. Postal. No, sir; because I remember he came flying around the corner, because his hair was and shirt was kind of waving.
Mr. Ball. And his shirt was out?
Mrs. Postal. Uh-huh.
Mr. Ball. You say——
Mrs. Postal. It was hanging out.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2021, 07:23:19 PM by Alan J. Ford »

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #193 on: October 22, 2021, 07:37:37 PM »




What an excellent still-rendition of Mr. Mentesana's home movie film, capturing the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza nowhere near making haste to get to 10th & Patton, please excuse the eyeroll.

Not only did Mr. Brewer and Ms. Postal confirm the same shirt colour as depicted in Mr. Mentesana's home video, they both confirmed the same manner of style how the wrongly-accused wore his shirt. Moreover, the whole world sees the same shirt at the wrongly-accused's midnight presser...

and, Yes, you guessed it folks worn with his shirttails hanging out.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2021, 07:47:25 PM by Alan J. Ford »

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #194 on: October 22, 2021, 07:56:43 PM »
Just before the wrongly-accused's midnight presser, where in those specific videos it's more than evident he is adorned as captured by Mr. Mentesana and described by both Mr. Brewer and Ms. Postal, note what he says loud enough to be captured on the news journalist's audio ---->


No truer words have been spoken...

in spite of the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure...amazing what some people will do & say for thirty pieces of silver...bunch of lying treasonous cowards.

Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder. -- George Washington

The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.



« Last Edit: October 22, 2021, 08:19:12 PM by Alan J. Ford »

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #195 on: October 29, 2021, 07:44:32 PM »
Brief Recap folks:

*Mr. Mentesana's home movie films the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza well after 1:02PM (Mr. Warnock confirms the time sequence as Fire Station 3's Big Red Truck wasn't dispatched to Dealey Plaza until 1:02PM CST). Given that the fire truck--visible to the wrongly-accused's left-- wasn't dispatched until 1:02PM--Mr. Warnock's words not mine--depending upon the distance from the fire station and additional travel time to get down to the plaza, we at least know the events at 10th & Patton have nothing to do with the wrongly-accused (in spite of a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure)

*It's been established that three different sources (Mr. Mentesana, Mr. Brewer and Ms. Postal) all account for the wrongly-accused donning the same coloured shirt depicted in Mr. Mentesana's home movie...and additionally worn in the same manner...hanging out. This is not by coincidence. It's the same man wearing the same clothes in the same manner in each of their observations.

*The apprehension of the wrongly-accused at the Texas Theatre confirms what's depicted in Mr. Mentesana's home movie film, and, of course, the observations of Mr. Brewer and Ms. Postal. Same colour, same shirt and worn in the same manner...hanging out.

*Additionally, the whole world, during the wrongly-accused's midnight press conference, is privy to the same coloured shirt depicted in Mr. Mentesana's home movie, and subsequently confirmed by the respective testimonies of Mr. Brewer and Ms. Postal, not to mention in all three instances worn in the same manner of style, hanging out. The exclamation point here, Yes, also worn hanging out during the wrongly-accused's press-conference. 

Back next week to reengage the Good Lord willing. In spite of a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure, The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody. 

*self-reminder: continue to compare Mr. Darnell (Jimmy's)  film with the wrongly-accused clip passing out leaflets down in New Orleans. A point of interest is the heavy-set gentlemen at the 3 sec-mark on the extreme lower-right of Mr. Darnell's film, when compared to the heavy-set gentlemen at the 41 second mark in the leaflet distribution clip...remember to compare this gentleman w/the following image of John Lester Quigley, Jr., who may be a chip off the old block of Bureau agent John Lester Quigley, who interviewed the wrongly-accused for an hour and a half in New Orleans. Not to mention--akin to Mr. Hosty's notes in Dallas--Mr. Quigley's notes were also destroyed... ?

Mr. Darnell:

 
Leaflet clip, courtesy of exemplary research of HelmerReenberg ---->


Mr. Quigley's son ?  ---->

https://www.restlandfuneralhome.com/obituaries/John-Quigley-1055/

Weird dates as in the written condolences reflect a year (1970) 39 years in advance of the actual obituary date (2009) ?









« Last Edit: October 29, 2021, 07:52:51 PM by Alan J. Ford »