Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Et tu, Bonnie?  (Read 266397 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #266 on: April 14, 2021, 08:14:04 PM »
Did Colonel Sanders have an alibi?  Maybe it was fowl play.  They were afraid Oswald was going to sing like a canary.

Good stuff.

Btw, are you suggesting the canary would wind up in black-face... in a kind of coal mine thing-cum-'he blowed up real good' deal?

Re Carcano dis/reassembly, a hint: Life can turn on a dime.. and a few screws.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2021, 08:17:30 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8378
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #267 on: April 14, 2021, 08:34:59 PM »
No projecting necessary on my part. You lot have the market cornered in that department.

What it like to be unable to have a normal discussion for fear of a total lack of arguments and/or evidence to back it up?

Doesn't it get tiresome to constantly play the forum's clown?

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3977
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #268 on: April 14, 2021, 08:52:46 PM »
If you don't know because you have only focused on pedantic nonsense like the remains of a chicken sandwich, just say so.  It seems like an interesting question that I don't recall anyone here ever discussing while going on and on endlessly about measuring Oswald's arm pits and how the bag was folded (kind of and sort of).

Someone other than Oswald having their lunch in the Sniper's Nest just before the assassination is pedantic nonsense?
I'm not sure about that.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #269 on: April 14, 2021, 10:03:50 PM »
In his affidavit or WC testimony, it is clear Frazier doesn't leave the front steps.
What is it in these statements that makes you believe he does?

That's what I mean about reading things in that aren't there.  Frazier said he remained still, but he didn't say for how long.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3977
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #270 on: April 14, 2021, 10:25:47 PM »
That's what I mean about reading things in that aren't there.  Frazier said he remained still, but he didn't say for how long.

I don't know what you're getting at John. Frazier says he goes back into the TSBD after a few minutes.

Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; I would say by the time, you know some of us went back in, and it wasn't just a few minutes,

But that's not the point. The post you responded to was this:

"In his affidavit or WC testimony, it is clear Frazier doesn't leave the front steps.
What is it in these statements that makes you believe he does?"


There is nothing in his affidavit or WC testimony that suggests he left the front steps at any point. You can have Frazier standing there all day if you want but he doesn't leave the steps.

If there's something to suggest he did leave the steps please point it out.



Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8378
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #271 on: April 14, 2021, 11:29:53 PM »
I don't know what you're getting at John. Frazier says he goes back into the TSBD after a few minutes.

Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; I would say by the time, you know some of us went back in, and it wasn't just a few minutes,

But that's not the point. The post you responded to was this:

"In his affidavit or WC testimony, it is clear Frazier doesn't leave the front steps.
What is it in these statements that makes you believe he does?"


There is nothing in his affidavit or WC testimony that suggests he left the front steps at any point. You can have Frazier standing there all day if you want but he doesn't leave the steps.

If there's something to suggest he did leave the steps please point it out.

In a perfect world, with people having instant total recall and the ability to communicate all the details in such a perfect way that one can rely on a single statement as being 100% accurate, the WC testimony might be considered as conclusive.

Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world. How often have you attended an interview or meeting, for which you prepared but, after leaving, nevertheless remembering that you forgot to mention a particular detail?

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3977
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #272 on: April 15, 2021, 12:36:06 AM »
In a perfect world, with people having instant total recall and the ability to communicate all the details in such a perfect way that one can rely on a single statement as being 100% accurate, the WC testimony might be considered as conclusive.

Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world. How often have you attended an interview or meeting, for which you prepared but, after leaving, nevertheless remembering that you forgot to mention a particular detail?

A particular detail?
Such as leaving the steps, seeing a man with a rifle approach who puts the rifle in the trunk of a car in which is already a shotgun whilst you promise you didn't see anything then walking past the front steps to the corner where you see Oswald walking up the street before you return to the steps.
That particular detail?

In a perfect world the some things really are obvious.
If you or John can find anything in Frazier's affidavit or WC testimony where he suggests leaving the steps please point it out.