This thread is a complete waste of time. This is another thread pushing a long-debunked, far-fetched theory that only a tiny number of researchers even take seriously. The theory being pushed by the thread's author is an unfortunate mutation of Howard Donahue's discredited Hickey-headshot theory.
Debunked? Discredited?
Show me one piece of credible debunking.
One strike & my Hickey theory is out.
Donahue (& McLaren) somehow missed realizing that Hickey fired more than one shot (they thort that Hickey fired the headshot only).
But offhand i dont recall any researchers that have taken Donahue's single-shot theory seriously.
And certainly zero researchers that take my multi-shot theory seriously.
Plus Donahue had some silly Carcano ricochet theory as well. So did Holland. My own ricochet theory is good. In other words i know more than everyone else around here combined.