Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?  (Read 50292 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #35 on: September 25, 2020, 11:22:46 PM »
Pretty sure Oswald is relevant

What you’re “pretty sure” of is also irrelevant.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #36 on: September 26, 2020, 03:04:05 AM »
The WC was designed to provide an explanation of the assassination.
In pursuing this "explanation", many issues were avoided, information was excluded, obfuscation was part of the process, etc.

My condolences if you haven't figured that out.

'many issues were avoided, information was excluded'
> Do any of those 'issues' and 'information' just happen to ooze out of CTer pet theories by any chance? 

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #37 on: September 26, 2020, 03:11:54 AM »
What you’re “pretty sure” of is also irrelevant.

Relevant enough to take a knee at his gravesite, apparently.

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 590
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #38 on: September 26, 2020, 03:21:24 AM »
The “paperwork” proves neither.

It proves that Oswald sent Klein's $21.45 for a rifle, and it proves Klein's sent LHO the C2766 rifle.

But keep pretending that all the Klein's paperwork is fake. After all, it's the only hope you've got.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #39 on: September 26, 2020, 07:18:35 AM »
Relevant enough to take a knee at his gravesite, apparently.

I’m still waiting for you to explain why that’s such a problem that you need to bring it up ad nauseum. Or a problem at all.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #40 on: September 26, 2020, 07:22:08 AM »
It proves that Oswald sent Klein's $21.45 for a rifle, and it proves Klein's sent LHO the C2766 rifle.

It proves nothing of the kind. It’s an order blank printed from microfilm that is now “missing”. It doesn’t prove that anything was sent anywhere.

Quote
But keep pretending that all the Klein's paperwork is fake. After all, it's the only hope you've got.

Sorry, I didn’t claim anything was fake.

But you keep pretending that unscientific and biased handwriting “analysis” of two block letters on a photograph of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order blank proves a damn thing.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2020, 07:24:56 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #41 on: September 26, 2020, 08:38:03 AM »
I’m still waiting for you to explain why that’s such a problem that you need to bring it up ad nauseum. Or a problem at all.

Whoa there, Tex: I'm only reportin' the news.
Not my bad if it makes you nauseous.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2020, 08:45:15 AM by Bill Chapman »