Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?

[John Iacoletti]

Whoa there, Tex: I'm only reportin' the news.
Not my bad if it makes you nauseous.

It wasn’t news the first time you “reported” it, much less the 57th.

[Bill Chapman]

It wasn’t news the first time you “reported” it, much less the 57th.

It's the gift that keeps on giving

[John Iacoletti]

It's the gift that keeps on giving

And you still can’t explain what the problem is.

[Bill Chapman]

And you still can’t explain what the problem is.

It's not a problem for me.
On the contrary, it's a gift.

[John Tonkovich]

It's not a problem for me.
On the contrary, it's a gift.

Oswald is an important figure in history. Why wouldn't you take a picture of his grave? It doesn't mean you're a "fan" of Oswald.
Guilt by association is such a silly argument. There's a picture of me, age 9, standing by the Brandenburg Gate. Does that mean I am a fan of Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm and Hitler, all of whom used it for political purposes?
( FYI, my family in Poland was oppressed by all those figures, especially old Adolf, so the question answers itself.)
What's your response to that, Mr Chapman?

[John Tonkovich]

Oswald supposedly ordered a 36" long gun, yet somehow received a 40" long gun.
Still no explanation as to why.
Ordered no ammo, no record of purchase of ammo.
Why?

[Walt Cakebread]

Oswald supposedly ordered a 36" long gun, yet somehow received a 40" long gun.
Still no explanation as to why.
Ordered no ammo, no record of purchase of ammo.
Why?

Oswald supposedly ordered a 36" long gun, yet somehow received a 40" long gun.
Still no explanation as to why.

This argument is silly......   Simply because the add listed the carcano as a 36" carbine doesn't preclude the possibility that Klein's had ran out of the 36" carcano and there fore simply shipped the 40 inch model to buyers.   

This argument has been going for decades......and it proves NOTHING!