Getting Some Facts Straight About the Single-Bullet Theory

[John Iacoletti]

Jackie:
'Top, behind the forehead'

Still waiting for the source of this alleged quote.

[Bill Chapman]

Still waiting for the source of this alleged quote.

McAdams site

[John Mytton]

Regarding the "irregular" slits in the front of JFK's shirt (that was the WC's term for them) and Organ's silly claim that the slits are the same length, even the HSCA FPP said the slits are not the same length: the FPP said that the right slit is 1.5 cm long and that the left slit is 1.4 cm long (7 HSCA 89).

The metric system can be difficult to understand but the difference between 1.4 cm and 1.5 cm is only 1mm which is 2/3 the thickness of a penny.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Do you understand why Connally's suit was laundered?
Hint: might have something to do with Connally's political future.

Do you know what "non-sequitur" means?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Do you know what "non-sequitur" means?

JohnM

Silly question. Most conclusions in the WC report are non-sequitur....

[John Tonkovich]

Do you know what "non-sequitur" means?

JohnM

Yes, your postings are, primarily, non sequiturs. You seem unable to answer questions, so you post unrelated info, and meaningless graphics.

Now, why would the Connaly suit be laundered?
But , not JFK's?
There was a very good reason to launder the suit. And, it was tied to the single bullet theory.
Do you understand that, or do I need to explain it for you?

[Bill Chapman]

Do you understand why Connally's suit was laundered?
Hint: might have something to do with Connally's political future.

Can't wait for your press conference