Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Having a much better sense now of the modest dimensions of the sizeable object in the doorway---------------



---------------we can, I think, safely say that it is a lot too small to be either of these:



It seems to be just a regular-sized flag, of the sort that lots of folks turned up with at Love Field and along the P. Parade route.

But the man waving it was far from just a regular spectator of the P. Parade. Mr. Oswald was up to something.

 

[Alan Ford]

So, to the merchants of 'Nothing To See Here', I have a simple challenge:
Show me where I have gone wrong in this matter.

Do YOU have ANY alternative suggestion for

a) what the sizeable flapping object is (if not a flag)?
b) where it is (if not in the doorway)?
c) who is waving it (if not the man in the reddish shirt we have just seen in Hughes)?



If my analysis is off, then it should be the easiest thing in the world to debunk it, right?

 

[Alan Ford]

[Alan Ford]

This is not a coat blowing in the wind---------------it remains in this position across multiple frames:



And look at the distance from the bottom of it to the woman's legs:



What do YOU think it is? The trunk of a little tree? A cape made of plastic?

 

[Zeon Mason]

The white lump by the curb Looks more like a trash bag to me

Mr. Ford , you’ve got to admit it’s quite a leap from guessing what something is to making a declarative statement that the object or fuzzy image is a flag.

This causes some people to ROFL and completely dismiss the entire theory.

Although I’m kind of amused myself by this amazing ability Mr.Ford has of constructing a theory, (to almost LOL) ,  I’m never the less going to stay with it for a little longer, until some one definitively proves a 1963 camera that Hughes used, could morph  black checkerboard square pattern of Loveladys shirt into the reddish brown seemingly solid texture ( as it appears to me anyway).

Maybe an experiment should be conducted setting up the same type camera where Hughes was and have a man wearing Loveladys shirt be filmed at that 12:30 time of day in November, and at the correct distance.

Not sure I follow logic of using a Cuban flag and waiting to very last sec to display the flag, which it doesn’t even appear to have been accomplished in the 1st place.

So imo, the reddish and whitish blob in Towner film , that Mr Ford perceives to be a Cuban Flag,  MAY instead be Oswald moving from against the west wall to the position in front of and just below Lovelady.

Possibly conspirators  spotted Oswald in the Towner film and so added a drop of black to remove Oswald’s head? This would be a very minimal way to change what would be obviously a persons body into a more anomalous reddish blob.

Is not the current speculative reason for the anomalous shadow on Lovelady in Weigman film that Oswald ( or Oswald’s head at least) had to be darkened out?

If so, then has it not been illustrated by the yellow eclipse of where Oswald would theoretically be in Weigman that Oswald must have moved slightly eastward to be where he was in Wiegman film?

And then Oswald moved BACK to the west wall and took probably his last drink of coke , such that he got captured in Altgens photo doing exactly the same raising the arm up like he did earlier in Hughes film?

For these reasons therefore, it seems more probable imo, that the “flapping” effect may just be the camera blur of Oswald having having moved over and down one step for a few seconds , such that he was captured not only in Weigman film , but ALSO in the Towner film and Bell films. And the absence of a head on that reddish blob being conspirators hiding that this IS ANOTHER PERSON wearing a reddish/ brown shirt unbuttoned with white T-shirt showing.

[Alan Ford]

it seems more probable imo, that the “flapping” effect may just be the camera blur of Oswald having having moved over and down one step for a few seconds ,

I suggest that the rectangular object flapping furiously in the wind is a flag.

You suggest this:



I'm pretty sure my suggestion is not the one that's ROFL-worthy.

I'm afraid the rest of your post is terribly confused too, Mr. Mason. I'll deal with some of its points separately.

 

[Alan Ford]

Although I’m kind of amused myself by this amazing ability Mr.Ford has of constructing a theory,

And I'm kind of amazed by your amusing ability to miss key points of the hypothesis being presented!

Here's what I'm hypothesizing:

1. Mr. Oswald brings out a flag, concealed inside what will become CE142, and awaits his moment. Whatever is on the flag (national colors? 'Viva Fidel'? 'Hands off Cuba'?), it is something politically provocative

2. When Pres. Kennedy is passing the building, Mr. Oswald waves the flag, and takes a photograph to capture the moment. The aim is not to be noticed waving the flag by lots of folks in Dealey Plaza, but to have photographic proof that he was there, doing this, when shots were fired into the air from the sixth floor. This proof he intends to instrumentalize in some way (perhaps to gain entry into Cuba on the basis that he was a participant in the [non-lethal, as Mr. Oswald has been tricked into believing] Glorious Action of 11/22). Mr. Oswald will, per plan, discard the long paper bag (with flag inside) near the front steps, knowing it will be discovered and will make the news coverage of the Dealey Plaza incident

3. After the shots ring out, Mr. Oswald returns the flag inside the long paper bag. He leaves the steps

4. Off the steps he has an encounter with a woman who has come running up. Something he says, or something in his demeanor, as well as his subsequent action of discarding the long paper sack between the two mailboxes and walking away, troubles her

5. She goes to the mailboxes and retrieves the long paper sack, and tries to draw attention

6. She is noticed by Officer Baker, who runs not for the doorway but for her.