Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read  (Read 69571 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #77 on: April 27, 2020, 01:35:53 AM »
Give a Marine sharpshooter 9 or 10 seconds and have the target slow down dramatically before the last shot.
Anyone who knows anything about the Marine Corps knows that every Marine must qualify as a rifleman.
Lee Oswald did not go to the infantry. So he was not consequently a very dedicated killer in that regard.
Marines must also train to swim. Where on record was Oswald's swimming interests?
I mean seriously--- he went to radar school...not exactly a blood and guts Seal type vocation.
Furthermore no one has ever feasibly explained why a lone shooter would not drill his target right between the eyes when they had the chance. 

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #78 on: April 27, 2020, 01:45:29 AM »
Mr. LIEBELER - You told us that in this particular rifle practice, or firing, that the scores were kept by NCOs.
Mr. DELGADO - Yes.
Mr. LIEBELER - Was it a common practice for the privates to make deals like this with the noncommissioned officers in connection with a thing like this?
Mr. DELGADO - They are making a deal with the other guys pulling the targets. See, the guy back there is also keeping a score.
Now, your NCO, particularly your NCO, may want to push you or make you qualify, because he doesn't want to spend another day out there on the rifle range, see; so it's not all that strict. Like if I was line NCO and I had five men in my section, and four of them qualified, that means that some other day, maybe on my day off, I will have to come in with this other fellow, so I will help him along and push each other along.
You don't try to mess nobody up, but you can't take a man that is shooting poorly and give him a 190 score, see; you could just give him the bare minimum, 170 or 171, to make it look good.
Mr. LIEBELER - Just to qualify him?
Mr. DELGADO - Just to qualify him.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #79 on: April 27, 2020, 02:39:58 AM »
Mr. LIEBELER - You told us that in this particular rifle practice, or firing...
... NCO, may want to push you or make you qualify, because he doesn't want to spend another day out there on the rifle range ....
Usually, a trainee will shoot well with a bench rest position and a desire to shoot well.
Trainers will have their shooters qualify if they have to stay and shoot under the moonlight if necessary.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #80 on: April 27, 2020, 02:58:13 AM »
But Boswell himself thought the face sheet markings were approximate and the measurements were what was important.



It's possible the "face sheet" misleading marking with regards to the "back" wound was what Rankin was referring to when he said the back wound was below the shoulder blade.

No. The "face sheet" placement of the "back" wound is much lower when compared to the autopsy photo. The photo shows the distance from the wound to the mastoid tip and the tip of the scapula to be equal. This was recorded (presumably accurately) as an equal distance and presented in the autopsy report.

    "This wound is measured to be 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion
      process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process."

Right Jerry.

These are the same autopsy doctors who missed the throat wound.

They also, if you're to believe the Clark Panel, Rockefeller Commission, HSCA and I think the Church Committee, placed the wound in the back of JFK's skull to low. 4 inches too low.

Although some believe it was changed by the Clark Panel only after critics pointed out a wound at EOP on the back of JFK's skull doesn't work for a LN shooter from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD.

Others believe the Clark Panel found a second wound track, meaning 2 separate bullets.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #81 on: April 27, 2020, 06:20:26 PM »

   If You are going to agree that the Autopsy Dr's, "weren't competent", You are also casting Doubt on Everything Else that these same Dr's observed/touched/& measured during the Autopsy. Thanks for that Jerry!

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #82 on: April 27, 2020, 09:01:36 PM »
   You can Not have it both ways. Either you want to be "dead on, balls accurate" with Everything or You do Not. If you are going to be "dead on, balls accurate", then we have a Huge Issue with the size of the bullet hole in JFK's skull.

We don't have the size of the bullet hole in JFK's skull. The pathologists never measured it. Or if they did , they never recorded it.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #83 on: April 27, 2020, 09:33:21 PM »
We don't have the size of the bullet hole in JFK's skull. The pathologists never measured it. Or if they did , they never recorded it.

   Better look again Magoo! Do you see that Mark drawn on the back of the head with a "15" to the side? Yeah, head wound and size.