Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read  (Read 69388 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #91 on: April 28, 2020, 04:08:52 PM »
      NPIC Image Expert Dino Brugioni examined the Zapruder Film on 11/23/63. He said the film he examined that night was Not the same Zapruder film we have today. Brugioni Specifically referenced there being a difference in the Explosion of JFK's head he Examined on 11/23/63 and the Explosion depicted on the Current Zapruder Film.

Royell, That "explosion" on the side of JFK's head is fake!     Hoover knew immediately that the bullet hole on the side of JFK's head would be an instant give away that the shot had came from behind the picket fence, so they altered the film .....   

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #92 on: April 28, 2020, 04:29:04 PM »
Royell, That "explosion" on the side of JFK's head is fake!     Hoover knew immediately that the bullet hole on the side of JFK's head would be an instant give away that the shot had came from behind the picket fence, so they altered the film .....

     Image Expert Brugioni supports your Theory. Also, NONE of the Parkland Hospital Professionals that examined/treated JFK less than 30 minutes after the shooting EVER reported seeing that Large Hole/Flap in the right temple area. Parkland Dr's reported that external cardiac massage was applied to JFK and that blood/matter were falling out of the back of his head as each chest massage/compression was applied. Likewise, if there had been a Massive Wound/Hole in the (R) Temple Region, there also would have been blood/matter oozing out of that wound with each compression of the chest during external cardiac massage.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2020, 04:32:03 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #93 on: April 28, 2020, 04:48:44 PM »
     Image Expert Brugioni supports your Theory. Also, NONE of the Parkland Hospital Professionals that examined/treated JFK less than 30 minutes after the shooting EVER reported seeing that Large Hole/Flap in the right temple area. Parkland Dr's reported that external cardiac massage was applied to JFK and that blood/matter were falling out of the back of his head as each chest massage/compression was applied. Likewise, if there had been a Massive Wound/Hole in the (R) Temple Region, there also would have been blood/matter oozing out of that wound with each compression of the chest during external cardiac massage.

I'm not sure but I believe that the "explosion" on JFK's right temple would be seen in frames 314 and 315 ( 3/18 of a second )   I don't recall anybody ever making an issue out of the "explosion".   I guess most folks just assumed that it was an actual explosion of JFK's head and it was too gruesome to discuss.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #94 on: April 28, 2020, 05:03:31 PM »
I'm not sure but I believe that the "explosion" on JFK's right temple would be seen in frames 314 and 315 ( 3/18 of a second )   I don't recall anybody ever making an issue out of the "explosion".   I guess most folks just assumed that it was an actual explosion of JFK's head and it was too gruesome to discuss.

     Brugioni DID make an Issue out of the Explosion. This is the same CIA Image Expert that was called in to Examine Top Secret aerial photos of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis. He ain't no ham-n-egger. 

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #95 on: April 28, 2020, 06:31:15 PM »
Here's something that I've never been able to understand.....  At frame 313 of the Z film there is what appears to be an explosion on the side of JFK's head at the right temple, just forward of the ear.   But there was no damage to JFK's head at that location other than a small bullet hole in the hairline that Clint Hill reported seeing, when he climbed aboard the Lincoln.    There are colored photos that show a small red dot right at the spot that Clint Hill said that he saw a bullet hole.

I strongly suspect that the "explosion" on the side of JFK's head at Z 313 was added to the film to cover up that bullet hole.

I don't think the Z-film was altered other than possibly removing frames.

I think what happened at Z-313 is hard to understand because of all the misinformation from the autopsy and the WC.

If we knew where the shots were coming from and when I suspect Z_313 would make a lot more sense than it does.
IMO

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #96 on: April 28, 2020, 07:05:50 PM »
I don't think the Z-film was altered other than possibly removing frames.

I think what happened at Z-313 is hard to understand because of all the misinformation from the autopsy and the WC.

If we knew where the shots were coming from and when I suspect Z_313 would make a lot more sense than it does.
IMO

Clint Hill has said many times that he saw a small bullet hole in the hair line just forward of JFK's right ear ( the exact spot where the "explosion" is shown at Z 313.)

If that explosion had occurred at that spot, Hill could not have see a small bullet hole there. (Because there would have been a huge hole there)   Hill pointed to his right temple and said that he had seen a bullet hole there and the back of JFK's head was gone....

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #97 on: April 28, 2020, 07:28:13 PM »
Clint Hill has said many times that he saw a small bullet hole in the hair line just forward of JFK's right ear ( the exact spot where the "explosion" is shown at Z 313.)

If that explosion had occurred at that spot, Hill could not have see a small bullet hole there. (Because there would have been a huge hole there)   Hill pointed to his right temple and said that he had seen a bullet hole there and the back of JFK's head was gone....

Kellerman testified there was a volley of shots that came into the car all at once after the first report.  I think some things might be explained by more than one bullet striking JFK's skull.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2020, 07:40:19 PM by Gary Craig »