If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?

[Ray Mitcham]

Already did that, Ray. Read my posts above.

You wrote "This isn't speculation, it's fact."

It isn't fact. It is speculation. Absence of the bullet doesn't mean a bullet wasn't found. You cannot prove that a bullet wasn't retrieved.

[Howard Gee]

It doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what people who were there recalled. They recalled that the last two were in rapid succession. They recalled a pattern to to shots: the time between 2 and 3 was noticeably shorter than between 1 and 2. That necessarily means that there was only one shot before z250 , which is well after JFK began showing reaction to his throat wound. Why is it preposterous? How do you explain the evidence from many independent sources that JFK reacted to the first shot? Why did no one see JFK smile and wave for 3 seconds after the first shot?You tell me. All I can say is that it was travelling on a downward and right to left trajectory through JFK's neck exiting to the left of his tie knot, likely traveling straight but tumbling at about 1000 to 1500 feet per second. It would have travelled another 5 inches farther left before crossing the plane of JBC's seatback. This was well to the left of JBC'right armpit. Since it does not appear to have struck the car and it did not strike JFK's hands, it must have hit JBC. The question is where?. All I can say is that it was not his right armpit.

Didn't you just say that JFK was hit by the first shot and JBC the second ?

When (what Z frame) do you have the first shot hitting JFK and what frame do you claim JBC is hit by the second ?

[Howard Gee]

Are you seriously claiming that JFK's only reaction to having a bullet enter his back, go through his neck and exit from his throat is to 'stop smiling and waving' ?

Really ?

And that JBC sat there not reacting at all to a bullet entering his thigh ?

Seriously ?

 

[Howard Gee]

You wrote "This isn't speculation, it's fact."

It isn't fact. It is speculation. Absence of the bullet doesn't mean a bullet wasn't found. You cannot prove that a bullet wasn't retrieved.

So your version of the assassination has a bullet being recovered from JFK's throat ?

 

[Rob Caprio]

Caprio apparently doesn't understand what a pain the butt it is to scroll past his page long diatribes.

Not surprising. He still doesn't understand why page after page of links to his series were removed in order to make the forum more readable.

But what can you expect from a guy that can't determine what year a death occurred in even after being shown a gravestone, death certificate and newspaper article proving beyond any doubt precisely when the death occurred.

 

You heard it folks. To Gee the actual evidence is a "pain in the butt." I guess so when it shows that all the claims by the WC are false.

Why do you support false claims Gee?

[Rob Caprio]

Caprio also thinks that Ruby didn't shoot Oswald and that Oswald's pubic hairs are fake.

JohnM

Quote me saying either statement. Failure to do so will again demonstrate that you are a dishonest person.

[Ray Mitcham]

So your version of the assassination has a bullet being recovered from JFK's throat ?

 

You don't know, so your laughs are rather hollow, Howard.