Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy

[John Iacoletti]

No. I don't "put the first shot" anywhere. The evidence does.  The shot missed the limousine.  Haven't you been keeping up with this?

I'll bite.  What exactly is the evidence that there was a shot that missed the limousine?

[John Iacoletti]

Was it hit-miss-hit or miss-hit-hit?
the WC never told us.

Or hit-hit-hit like the FBI thought. Or hit-hit like Andrew Mason thinks.

How can something so supposedly "obvious" be interpreted in so many different ways?

[Bill Chapman]

It never ceases to amaze me when people think that their own interpretations of what's going on in the Z film are "obvious".

Tell us what's going on in Zap

[John Iacoletti]

Tell us what's going on in Zap

As to when shots did or did not occur?  Nothing obvious.

[Bill Chapman]

As to when shots did or did not occur?  Nothing obvious.

No quick reaction demonstrated by either victim at any point? That kind of 'nothing obvious'?

[John Iacoletti]

No quick reaction demonstrated by either victim at any point? That kind of 'nothing obvious'?

I see lots of "quick reactions" by lots of people.

[Allan Fritzke]

Tell us what's going on in Zap

Everyone just continues to ignore Z329/330 where the real head shot comes in and you can see an unmistakable red smear over the President's head, his actual slumping right after and Jacqueline's instantaneous reaction to what has just taken place and wanting to leave the car through the back!
I would call that frontal shot absolutely undeniable given the driver Greer's head going to the corner of the windshield and Kellerman ducking out simultaneously.  If Zapruder shook his camera, it was in reaction to what he just saw and heard - not Z313 however which has no explanation other than a very slight frontal head movement of the POTUS!