Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy  (Read 56810 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2018, 07:31:49 PM »
The shooter proved Ernie wrong. He cut to the quick and used a rifle instead of diagrams.

 :D

Yet another circular argument from the master.

Offline Joffrey van de Wiel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2018, 07:33:27 PM »
The HSCA analyzed the Zapruder film with the following results:

1) First shot fired between Z-162 and Z-167. Governor Connally turns his head rapidly from his left to his right.

2) Second shot fired between Z-181 and Z-192. Impact on the limousine between Z-182 and Z-193. President abruptly stops in the midst of a wave and turns to his wife between Z-200 and Z-207. It is a response to a severe external stimulus, according to the report. By the time he emerges from behind the road sign at Z-225 it is clear he has been shot.

3) Third shot fired at Z-210 and impact on the President's head at Z-212.

But I think Tague testified that he was hit in the face with a bullet fragment or pieces of concrete after the second shot.

And I fail to understand how the assassin could have missed not only the President and the limousine but the entire street with his first and easiest shot (closest in range).

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2018, 07:42:55 PM »
I recall someone (Brennan?) saying the shooter stepped or stood back or down after the last shot.

In his affidavit he said "stepped down out of sight".  Which raises the question...stepped down from what?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2018, 08:44:04 PM »
In his affidavit he said "stepped down out of sight".  Which raises the question...stepped down from what?

From Brennan's angle, stepping back from the window could be seen as stepping down


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5107
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2018, 09:07:17 PM »
From Brennan's angle, stepping back from the window could be seen as stepping down

       And your Proof of that statement would be what? Oswald was allegedly in a Seated position.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2018, 09:42:16 PM »
       And your Proof of that statement would be what? Oswald was allegedly in a Seated position.

He must have crawled backwards.  Whatever it takes...

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Zapruder's testimony to the WC = conspiracy
« Reply #34 on: August 01, 2018, 09:55:22 PM »
       And your Proof of that statement would be what? Oswald was allegedly in a Seated position.

Try to follow along. Ernie challenged me as to where the shooter could be standing to make a shot. I have never said that the shooter had to be standing; and in fact was either sitting or kneeling in my opinion.

Now show me where I did anything other than make the observation that the angle from Brennan's position could make it seem as if the shooter was stepping back from that window.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2018, 09:57:52 PM by Bill Chapman »