Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1114454 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5139
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #805 on: August 13, 2018, 10:25:16 PM »
  What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer.

Quote
What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer.

Exactly, if you think that jpeg artifacts are buttons then you have no right to analyse anything.

JohnM

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #806 on: August 14, 2018, 02:11:05 AM »
Seriously, if you can't see that Duncan's presentation is an obvious joke than you have no right to analyse any image and that goes for you and Buttons.

JohnM

  What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer. An ALTERED JFK Assassination Image for whatever reason is an accident waiting to happen.  All ALTERED JFK Assassination Images should be labeled as such. Requesting this be done is Not like asking for ice water in hell.   

Good point Royell, and I do agree!

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #807 on: August 14, 2018, 03:17:07 AM »
If PM is not Oswald,why is the TV company that owns the original PM footage refusing to release the footage? What are they trying to hide?

Fred
I am not exactly sure what is meant by "original PM footage", but the TSBD Elm St Entrance Portal area image, as seen during and/or or just seconds after the shooting that resulted in the JohnKennedySr Assassination and JohnConnallyJr CriticalWounding, was filmed by a hand-held VideoImage/MotionPictureCamera in 1963, as the CameraPerson rode in/on a moving Motorcade ConvertibleVehicle. And, it appears as though any PersonImages and/or ObjectImages seen in the portal area were background, and not focus points.
Not much to see, and even less to hide, IMO.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2018, 05:47:04 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #808 on: August 14, 2018, 08:12:58 AM »
Let me clear one thing up.
I have never, ever, altered an image without saying so, and without giving a reason for any alteration(s)
The original posted image being discussed with the imaginary Buttons was not altered in any way apart from the addition of the arrows.
When I used the words "Invention" and "Creation" in my post, I was referring to my imagination, creating and changing the artifacts to portray the perception in the viewer's mind of the artifacts being Buttons.
It obviously worked for some gullibles of the community.


 

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5035
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #809 on: August 14, 2018, 03:47:42 PM »
Well Buttons, that counts you out straight away.

Anyway, a good detective/analyst would realize that psychedelic spacing of buttons wasn't a thing until the late 60's and besides I don't think that the Old Lady appears to be that radical, Maaaann!



JohnM

       Get off your high horse. It is Not for You to grade/rank anyone that is merely looking at or possibly examining a JFK Assassination Image. Your pompous evaluations of those that are interested in this Unsolved 54+ year old case do absolutely Nothing to further the investigation.

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #810 on: August 14, 2018, 07:31:01 PM »
It has taken you years to learn to post an image. I'm glad to see that you computer and/or mouse is now able to post images.

Where?

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #811 on: August 14, 2018, 07:40:24 PM »
Where?

My mistake Duncan, he reposted an image supplied by John Mytton. Thought it was too good to be true.

Duncan, can you do nothing to stop this idiot posting lies?