Prayer Woman

[John Mytton]

          The above is an example of the Danger of Altering JFK Assassination Images. Whether looking at JFK Assassination film footage, still frames, or photos the question consistently arises as to whether the image has been Cropped, Colorized, or flat-out Altered.  Innocent intentions can lead to misconceptions at a later point in time.

Innocent intentions can lead to misconceptions at a later point in time.

Seriously, if you can't see that Duncan's presentation is an obvious joke than you have no right to analyse any image and that goes for you and Buttons.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Seriously, if you can't see that Duncan's presentation is an obvious joke than you have no right to analyse any image and that goes for you and Buttons.

JohnM

  What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer. An ALTERED JFK Assassination Image for whatever reason is an accident waiting to happen.  All ALTERED JFK Assassination Images should be labeled as such. Requesting this be done is Not like asking for ice water in hell.   

[John Mytton]

  What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer.

What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer.

Exactly, if you think that jpeg artifacts are buttons then you have no right to analyse anything.

JohnM

[Larry Trotter]

Seriously, if you can't see that Duncan's presentation is an obvious joke than you have no right to analyse any image and that goes for you and Buttons.

JohnM

  What might be "obvious" is subject to the interpretation of the viewer. An ALTERED JFK Assassination Image for whatever reason is an accident waiting to happen.  All ALTERED JFK Assassination Images should be labeled as such. Requesting this be done is Not like asking for ice water in hell.   

Good point Royell, and I do agree!

[Larry Trotter]

If PM is not Oswald,why is the TV company that owns the original PM footage refusing to release the footage? What are they trying to hide?

Fred

I am not exactly sure what is meant by "original PM footage", but the TSBD Elm St Entrance Portal area image, as seen during and/or or just seconds after the shooting that resulted in the JohnKennedySr Assassination and JohnConnallyJr CriticalWounding, was filmed by a hand-held VideoImage/MotionPictureCamera in 1963, as the CameraPerson rode in/on a moving Motorcade ConvertibleVehicle. And, it appears as though any PersonImages and/or ObjectImages seen in the portal area were background, and not focus points.
Not much to see, and even less to hide, IMO.

[Duncan MacRae]

Let me clear one thing up.
I have never, ever, altered an image without saying so, and without giving a reason for any alteration(s)
The original posted image being discussed with the imaginary Buttons was not altered in any way apart from the addition of the arrows.
When I used the words "Invention" and "Creation" in my post, I was referring to my imagination, creating and changing the artifacts to portray the perception in the viewer's mind of the artifacts being Buttons.
It obviously worked for some gullibles of the community.


 

[Royell Storing]

Well Buttons, that counts you out straight away.

Anyway, a good detective/analyst would realize that psychedelic spacing of buttons wasn't a thing until the late 60's and besides I don't think that the Old Lady appears to be that radical, Maaaann!



JohnM

       Get off your high horse. It is Not for You to grade/rank anyone that is merely looking at or possibly examining a JFK Assassination Image. Your pompous evaluations of those that are interested in this Unsolved 54+ year old case do absolutely Nothing to further the investigation.