DAN - You're obviously unfamiliar with all the history behind the Wiegman Film. Your challenging it being originally pushed as being "continuous", makes it clear that you are not even familiar with the letter that Gary Mack wrote taking "back water" on this very issue. You're also unaware of the details of the Brugioni Briefing Boards, his Notes for those briefing boards he prepared, and the differences he detailed between the Z Film he examined vs the Current Z Film. You wanna go with Zavada, but we can not be sure that Zavada and Brugioni examined the exact same film. Your current foundation pertaining to all of these issues consists of sand. Do some serious research and get down to the bedrock. There are many issues I would enjoy discussing with you once you put in the time and get up-to-speed.