Here are my timings for the footfalls of the lady wearing white shoes in the Zapruder footage & the Bronson footage.
Footfall was in
...
Footfall was in
Zapruder Frame... Bronson Frame
R @ Z295
L @ Z305
.. L @ UYB05.5
.
R @ Z316
. R @ UYB10.5
L @ Z325
. L @ UYB 15.0
Zapruder Frame... Bronson Frame
R @ Z295
L @ Z305
.. L @ UYB05.5
.
R @ Z316
. R @ UYB10.5
. this becomes UYB12.5 after inserting 6a & 8a from chart below.
L @ Z325
. L @ UYB15.0
The headshot seen in Z313 was fired at say Z312, which is 7 frames after Z305 & 4 frames before Z316, ie somewhere in the 11 frames.
The headshot in the Bronson footage was fired between UYB05.5 & UYB12.5, ie somewhere in the 7 frames.
Hence Z312 corresponds to UYB07.
The arithmetic is as follows. 7/11 times 7 is 4.46 Bronson frames - hence we add 4.46 to B05.5 & we get UYB09.96 --- ie Z312 corresponds to UYB09.
But UYB09 is a pseudo frame count resulting from us inserting the missing frames 6a & 8a (ie frames skipped by Unger) --- hence pseudo UYB09 is actually UYB07 --- hence Z312 corresponds to UYB07 (as mentioned above).
Hickey deniers have always insisted that Z313 corresponded to UYB09 --- & they have insisted that UYB09 shows Hickey sitting down --- hence they have insisted that Hickey could not have fired the Z313 headshot.
Their first mistake is that the headshot was not at Z313 --- it was at Z312 (& then hit at Z313)(the AR15 was say 21ft away from JFK).
Their second mistake was praps their timings of the footfalls of the lady wearing white shoes --- my own timings today might be exactly the same as theirs, or mine might be slightly different (& possibly more accurate than theirs)(i havent had a close look at their timings).
In my Reply#27 i said that
.
Notice Hickey standing upish at UYB07 (top of head is a half head lower than standing Agents).
Actually he is falling backwards in UYB07.https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2836.24.htmlSo, (the inferior 2017 copy of) the Bronson footage supports my theory that Hickey shot JFK.
And the museum wont let the general public have a copy of the superior 2019 copy of Bronson's footage.
Here below is a copy of what i said in my Reply#3.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2836.0.htmlBronson frame 20-50 is too blurry to be of any use. When measuring the good 19 frames i noticed that up to 6 frames were missing. The skipped or missing frames were found by measuring the horizontal distances moved by the lamp-pole & sign post relative to Queen Mary. I found 5 frames where the distance moved from the previous frame (ie the gap) was double or triple the usual. My measurements were in mm, measured on the glass face of my computer monitor, each mm vertically is about 0.91" on the car, & the horizontal scale might be similar (too lazy to check today).
... dist mm
. gap.
01
000
. 000.
2a
012
. 012.
02
025
. 013.
03
038
. 013.
04
049
.
010.
05
061
. 012.
6a ..
(072)
. (011).
06
083
. 011.
07
.. 094.5
. 011.5.
8a
.. (105)
. (010.5).
08
115.5
010.
09
123.5
008.
10
... 135
011.5.
11
145
. 010.
12a
(153)
(008).
12 ..
162
... 009.
13
170
. 008.
14
176.5
006.5.
15a
. (184)
(007.5).
15b
(192)
. (008).
15
201
. 009.
16
210
. 009.
17
221
. 011.
18
229
. 008.
19
235
. 006.
20 is too blurry to be of any use.
I inserted the dummy frames for the missing frames because that info might affect some future calculations. I can't remember the frame rate per second, it might be 12 fps.
