Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.  (Read 39305 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2021, 12:49:32 PM »
https://sites.google.com/view/bronson-ar15-inframe11/home
Spot the AR15.
This shows B11 which is 2 or 3 frames after the fatal shot at B09 or B08 (Zapruder frame 313 is B09 or praps a little before B09).
Enuff time i think for the AR15 to recoil from horizontal in B09 to near vertical in B11.
That little patch of pink at the AR15 aint Hickey's hand it is Bennett's face, which is the main reason that we can make out a fuzzy AR15 at all, if Bennett wasnt low down & leaning forward then we would not be able to see the AR15, but luckily it shows up dark against Bennett's face. Likewise in another frame.
More to come.

Attack of the Blobs
« Last Edit: March 01, 2021, 12:53:28 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2021, 02:31:04 PM »
https://topekatornado.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/the-Bronson-Kennedy-assasination-film-investigation-Report.v2.1.pdf
An interesting report by kenneth s weissman
"report: the bronson kennedy assassination film investigation"
which says that Robin Unger's 20 (screenprints i think) of the Museum's 2017 scan of Bronson's film (ie the 20 frames that i am using) are not as good as the Museum's 2019 scan of the 26 frames.

I doubt that the Museum would send me copies of their 26 2019 frames for free or even for dollars. Might Robin Unger be able to get copies?

The inferior 2017 Robin Unger frames (no fault of Robin) that i used definitely suffer from software artifacts (ie an attack of the blobs).
I wonder what the good hi-res 2019 version of UYB11 might show re that there AR15.
Plus what would the other 2019 frames show?

Weissman says that he would like to look at the original film frames using a microscope.  And adds that fixing the frames to use a microscope would be a danger to the film.  Why does Weissman think that a good digital copy is not as good as a microscope?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2024, 09:44:57 PM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #16 on: March 01, 2021, 08:31:28 PM »
Wouldn't it be something if 20 years from now it is established that JFK was shot by a Secret Service man and RFK was shot by a LA policeman?  Both by accident. 

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2021, 11:23:51 AM »
Of those 20 links posted above....all come up as a 'google error'--- check this before you post :-\What does that even mean?

Well, whatever it means, it sounds VERY profound.

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2021, 10:53:56 PM »
Well, whatever it means, it sounds VERY profound.
It means that the silly gunsmoke evidence that is the main basis for the silly sniper at the picket fence theory must if u apply that kind of reasoning also serve as evidence that Ruby did not shoot Oswald because no-one saw gunsmoke. And no-one shot from the 6th floor, & no-one shot Tippit, & no-one shot from Queen Mary.

Quote
I saw a claim that smoke can be seen in or near Queen Mary in Bronson's footage.
I can't see any.  If Hickey fired at B09 then we might see smoke at B10 B11 B12, & this would have to be at chest level in front of Hickey & the standing Agents, but i don’t see any such smoke. 

A patch of grass on the knoll behind Queen Mary seems to change color slightly from frame to frame, but that doesn't prove anything much.

Would an AR15 give much smoke?  I suspect that Hickey fired an auto burst of 3 shots, so praps 3 shots might make an appreciable amount of smoke.  Dunno.

Smoke evidence proves that ………………………………………………..…
(1) No-one shot from the 6th floor -- no-one saw gunsmoke.
(2) No-one shot Tippit -- no-one saw gunsmoke.
(3) No-one shot from the Queen Mary -- no-one saw gunsmoke.
(4) A shot came from the picket fence – many saw gunsmoke.
Many was called as a witness -- why wasnt no-one called? -- why wasnt No-one found guilty?

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2021, 03:07:39 AM »
I noticed something new today.  The Muchmore film is shown in the first 31 frames of the 120 frames in the Muchmore folder in Robin Unger's gallery on this website.  From frame M001 to M028 u can see the hood of Queen Mary.  At frames M029 M030 M031 u can see the driver Kinney.  He is starting to look to his right, & at frame M031 he has turned right as far as is possible without turning his body.  Unfortunately frame M031 is the last.   

What does the Nix film show?  Unfortunately frame M031 corresponds to i think Nix frame N232, & the lady with the tan coat blocks our view of Hickey in frames N231 N232 N233, & partly blocks Kinney in frames N230 N234.  But we can see that in earlier Nix frames & in later Nix frames Kinney is looking directly ahead towards the JFK limo.  The fatal shot is i think at N209, ie 23 Nix frames before Kinney's head turn at N232, ie a little over 1 second.

So, Kinney, who is keeping Queen Mary 6 ft behind the JFK limo, finds an urgent need to have a quick look to his right or rear.  Why?  Was it because Agent Ready has jumped off the running board & Agent Roberts is telling Ready to come back?  I don’t think so.  Kinney could see all of that action by just half turning to his right.  And Ready's jumping & unjumping is surely not as critical as the need to avoid squashing Agent Hill tween Queen Mary & the JFK limo.

Did Kinney turn his head hard right to get a look at Agent Landis jumping off the running board?  Landis did jump off, however i have never seen it mentioned.  Landis was standing next to the jump seats.  No, i don’t think that that was the reason.

Did Kinney turn his head hard right because Agent Hickey had fired his AR15 past Kinney's right earhole at frame M009 N209 UYB09 Z313?
Yes, the AR15 firing a shot (i reckon at least 4 shots)(an auto burst) past Kinney's right earhole would surely do the trick.  Kinney's head turn was probably a voluntary action, rather than non-voluntary, say 1 second after the shot,  but nonetheless it was fairly automatic & non-avoidable i reckon. 

What does the Bronson film tell us about Kinney's head turn?  Unfortunately the Bronson frames UYB01 to UYB20 stop at about Nix  N226, ie 6 Nix frames short of seeing Kinney's head turn at N232.  Bronson was standing on a pedestal, ie higher than Nix, hence the lady in the tan coat would not i think have blocked Bronson's view of Kinney's head.  The fatal shot was at UYB09 or a fraction earlier i think. 

U might remember that some days ago i mentioned the earlier head turn reaction by McIntyre (standing on the rear of the left running board).  He can be seen looking right in Bronson UYB04 to UYB09, ie towards Hickey, & we can assume that he is looking at Hickey because he has seen that Hickey has picked up the AR15.  The fatal shot is at about UYB09.  However unfortunately McIntyre is out of frame in the Muchmore film, hence the Muchmore film can't be used to confirm McIntyre's head turn. 
And McIntyre is out of frame in most of the Nix film.  He is only partly vizible in Nix frames N239 to N248 (we can see his head & the front half of his body).  In thems frames he is looking directly ahead.  Kinney turned his head 7 frames earlier at N232.  The fatal shot was at say N209.

Here is Muchmore M031 of 120, showing Kinney looking right.   And below that we see Nix N233 of 652 showing the lady blocking our view.
In N233 u can see under Queen Mary that Ready & Landis are both standing on the road.

« Last Edit: March 11, 2024, 09:53:43 PM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Bronson saw Hickey shoot JFK.
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2021, 12:17:55 PM »
It means that the silly gunsmoke evidence that is the main basis for the silly sniper at the picket fence theory must if u apply that kind of reasoning also serve as evidence that Ruby did not shoot Oswald because no-one saw gunsmoke. And no-one shot from the 6th floor, & no-one shot Tippit, & no-one shot from Queen Mary.

You need to up your game, Marjan........ we can top this.  google 'mark o'blazney meets culto'.

you're welcome+