Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?  (Read 13325 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #40 on: September 26, 2020, 07:22:08 AM »
Advertisement
It proves that Oswald sent Klein's $21.45 for a rifle, and it proves Klein's sent LHO the C2766 rifle.

It proves nothing of the kind. It’s an order blank printed from microfilm that is now “missing”. It doesn’t prove that anything was sent anywhere.

Quote
But keep pretending that all the Klein's paperwork is fake. After all, it's the only hope you've got.

Sorry, I didn’t claim anything was fake.

But you keep pretending that unscientific and biased handwriting “analysis” of two block letters on a photograph of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order blank proves a damn thing.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2020, 07:24:56 AM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #40 on: September 26, 2020, 07:22:08 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #41 on: September 26, 2020, 08:38:03 AM »
I’m still waiting for you to explain why that’s such a problem that you need to bring it up ad nauseum. Or a problem at all.

Whoa there, Tex: I'm only reportin' the news.
Not my bad if it makes you nauseous.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2020, 08:45:15 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #42 on: September 27, 2020, 09:54:55 PM »
Whoa there, Tex: I'm only reportin' the news.
Not my bad if it makes you nauseous.

It wasn’t news the first time you “reported” it, much less the 57th.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #42 on: September 27, 2020, 09:54:55 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #43 on: September 27, 2020, 10:36:42 PM »
It wasn’t news the first time you “reported” it, much less the 57th.

It's the gift that keeps on giving


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #44 on: September 28, 2020, 05:57:31 AM »
It's the gift that keeps on giving

And you still can’t explain what the problem is.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #44 on: September 28, 2020, 05:57:31 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #45 on: September 28, 2020, 07:26:43 AM »
And you still can’t explain what the problem is.

It's not a problem for me.
On the contrary, it's a gift.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2020, 08:32:16 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #46 on: September 28, 2020, 02:44:08 PM »
It's not a problem for me.
On the contrary, it's a gift.
Oswald is an important figure in history. Why wouldn't you take a picture of his grave? It doesn't mean you're a "fan" of Oswald.
Guilt by association is such a silly argument. There's a picture of me, age 9, standing by the Brandenburg Gate. Does that mean I am a fan of Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm and Hitler, all of whom used it for political purposes?
( FYI, my family in Poland was oppressed by all those figures, especially old Adolf, so the question answers itself.)
What's your response to that, Mr Chapman?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #46 on: September 28, 2020, 02:44:08 PM »


Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #47 on: September 28, 2020, 02:48:34 PM »
Oswald supposedly ordered a 36" long gun, yet somehow received a 40" long gun.
Still no explanation as to why.
Ordered no ammo, no record of purchase of ammo.
Why?