If Oswald Was The Assassin, Did He Plan His Escape From The TSBD Very Well?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: If Oswald Was The Assassin, Did He Plan His Escape From The TSBD Very Well?  (Read 338574 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
The most important evidence that keeps getting ignored is Adams own testimony that she saw and later corrected,

Where does this say that Adams saw this and later corrected it?

Quote
And the fact that the above story is 100% corroborated when Adams tells the exact same detailed story again to Leavelle is just the icing on the cake.

Of course she did.  On that late-night visit at the address that she had just moved to, and that Leavelle wouldn't have known about unless he followed her, after that "fire" he claimed her earlier statement had been destroyed in.

Seems legit.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
She never told any of this to Mark Lane. In fact Mark Lane ignored her. For him to ignore her points to the reality it was only in later years that she changed her story.

Forget Mark Lane... It's a lame excuse! Pay attention what she actually said to investigators;

On 11/24/63 Victoria Adams told FBI agents Hardin & Scott that after the last shot she and her friend (Styles) immediately ran to and down the stairs at the back of the building

On 02/17/64 she told Jim Leavelle that after the third shot she went out the backdoor and there was no one on the stairs

On 04/07/64 she testified to the WC;

Miss ADAMS - A tree. and we heard a shot, and it was a pause, and then a second shot, and then a third shot.
It sounded like a firecracker or a cannon at a football game, it seemed as if it came from the right below rather than from the left above. Possibly because of the report. And after the third shot, following that, the third shot, I went to the back of the building down the back stairs, 

Pretty consistent and yet, according to the LNs... all lies! Go figure


it was only in later years that she changed her story.

Victoria Adams never changed her story. If you want to debate this case, please ensure first that you have at least some basic knowledge of the facts!
« Last Edit: July 03, 2020, 12:50:59 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Have you tried, for starters, to see how long it takes to cover 9 steps?


Did you like how he managed to travel two floors on the stairs in 6 seconds? Was Tink being channeled?

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Forget Mark Lane... It's a lame excuse! Pay attention what she actually said to investigators;

Its not lame. The whole Mark Lane issue makes Miss Adams later story look poor.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
Its not lame. The whole Mark Lane issue makes Miss Adams later story look poor.

Of course it is lame. Mark Lane has nothing to do with this.... there is no "Mark Lane issue" and/or "Miss Adams later story"

The fact remains that Victoria Adams said the same thing in all the official documents we have. She went down the stairs immediately after the third shot. After her testimony to the WC she disappeared for decades and spoke to nobody. If you want to deny this is what happened, you will need to explain why she lied to the FBI, Jim Leavelle and the WC and you also need to explain why Dorothy Garner would lie about what she saw to Barefoot Sanders.

You can't explain that (or you would have done so by now) and only drag Mark Lane into it as a diversion. The only story that's poor is your own.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Did you like how he managed to travel two floors on the stairs in 6 seconds? Was Tink being channeled?

I'm talking about the guy @2:30

I asked you if you had tried timing a few steps on stairs yourself
I find that at a casual rate of speed I get 2 steps per second

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
It appears to be "against your religion" to believe a word that Howard Brennan says.
Just a second there. Bias leaks brown all over the place. Brennan saw someone. OK give him that. Because he was willing ultimately to finger Oswald [or so it seemed] the Warren Report dedicated an entire page to him [p.63]...
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-3.html#near
Arnold Rowland saw someone also--
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/rowland_a.htm
...but because it didn't agree with the Oswald did it conclusion, he wasn't even mentioned in that final Report.
Get it?