Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.  (Read 1170 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« on: November 22, 2019, 04:09:52 AM »
Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy, so far it could be The Dallas Police or Hoover or The CIA or some sort of rogue element or the military or basically anybody but Oswald, but why is no one bright enough to figure this out, surely with the thousands of enthusiasts someone has to stumble into some solid evidence, where is it?
Why has nobody even come close to exposing any conspiracy, is it because it was Oswald and all the evidence just fits?
Anyway, if someone knows something and can back this up with proof then let's hear it, or otherwise your time is running out and I'm afraid without some decent evidence history will forever find Oswald guilty of killing two men. That's just how it works.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« on: November 22, 2019, 04:09:52 AM »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2019, 04:56:40 AM »
Never mind a conspiracy. 56 years later, and there’s still no proof that Oswald killed Kennedy. Just assumptions and rhetoric.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2750
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2019, 05:06:47 AM »
CTers say 'hearsay'
LNers say 'see/say'

The CT crowd has cornered the market on paranoia

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2019, 05:06:47 AM »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2019, 05:54:47 AM »
Never mind a conspiracy. 56 years later, and there’s still no proof that Oswald killed Kennedy. Just assumptions and rhetoric.

You said it yourself, all the evidence leads to Oswald and if it wasn't Oswald then all the incriminating evidence must have come about somehow?
You dispute the evidence, call cops liars, say eyewitnesses were mistaken etc, so this all by itself should lead you to some sort of conclusion, why waste your time with someone who you know "still has no proof of guilt".
Surely playing Oswald's defence attorney year after year must get a little tiresome whereas being a LNer, knowing the truth and observing you Kooks trying all your crazy/silly/ridiculous/pathetic arguments is an interesting study of Paranoia.

JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2019, 05:56:57 AM »
All of the physical evidence that exists points to Oswald and no one else.  No physical evidence exists which points to anyone other than Oswald.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 05:58:25 AM by Bill Brown »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2019, 05:56:57 AM »

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2019, 09:12:14 AM »
All of the physical evidence that exists points to Oswald and no one else.  No physical evidence exists which points to anyone other than Oswald.

But...... but........ haven't you been listening to Judyth Baker and her Conventioneers?  Surely all of them can't be wrong.....  I wonder if she went to Groden's wedding?   LOL !!!!

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2019, 03:45:22 PM »
You said it yourself, all the evidence leads to Oswald and if it wasn't Oswald then all the incriminating evidence must have come about somehow?
You dispute the evidence, call cops liars, say eyewitnesses were mistaken etc, so this all by itself should lead you to some sort of conclusion, why waste your time with someone who you know "still has no proof of guilt".

In reality it is you who calls assumptions and rhetoric “evidence”, cherry-picks witnesses, and assumes that if a cop says something, it therefore must be true.

If you think your case is closed, why do you waste your time trying to make it over and over?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2019, 03:45:22 PM »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2019, 03:48:51 PM »
All of the physical evidence that exists points to Oswald and no one else.  No physical evidence exists which points to anyone other than Oswald.

What little physical evidence there is, is all questionable or tainted in some way. Which is why the “Oswald did it” evangelists either refuse to enumerate it at all or they misrepresent it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2019, 03:48:51 PM »

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2019, 04:50:10 PM »
Actually, there's plenty of proof from the autopsy that Oswald could not possibly have acted alone. Witnesses describe Humes probing the back wound and finding no exit. That alone kills the lone nut scenario. Ask the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses where the head wound was. If the shooter from behind hit the president's head, we would see a violent motion forward, right? Instead, all the films show a violent "back and to the left" motion and a wound in the lower right portion of the President's head. That is totally incompatible with a head shot from behind. Sorry lone nutters, but if Oswald was the assassin, all the facts would come together easily. Instead, we have evidence of multiple shooters and trying to force Arlen Specter's boneheaded theory into the history books is an atrocity. The truth is much more complex. The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2019, 05:16:23 PM »
Actually, there's plenty of proof from the autopsy that Oswald could not possibly have acted alone. Witnesses describe Humes probing the back wound and finding no exit. That alone kills the lone nut scenario. Ask the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses where the head wound was. If the shooter from behind hit the president's head, we would see a violent motion forward, right? Instead, all the films show a violent "back and to the left" motion and a wound in the lower right portion of the President's head. That is totally incompatible with a head shot from behind. Sorry lone nutters, but if Oswald was the assassin, all the facts would come together easily. Instead, we have evidence of multiple shooters and trying to force Arlen Specter's boneheaded theory into the history books is an atrocity. The truth is much more complex. The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

Actually Jim, Kennedy's head initially moves forward and away from Oswald's rifle.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2019, 05:16:23 PM »

 

Mobile View