Nitpicky Question About The Bag

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Nitpicky Question About The Bag  (Read 33297 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8235
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2019, 12:36:57 AM »
John,

Are you a Conspiracy Theorist, or just an over-the-top Oswald defender?

--  MWT  ;)

Or just a realist who is correct....

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2019, 12:49:02 AM »
Or just a realist who is correct....

Marty,

Oh yeah?

Correct about what?

That Oswald was "innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent!" ?

LOL

--  MWT   ;)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2019, 12:54:05 AM »
Tom is either utterly clueless or he’s strawmanning again (or both).

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8235
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2019, 01:25:18 AM »
Marty,

Oh yeah?

Correct about what?

That Oswald was "innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent!" ?

LOL

--  MWT   ;)

Correct about what?

If that needs to be explained to you, perhaps you should look for something else to occupy your pastime.


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2019, 01:57:58 AM »
Correct about what?

If that needs to be explained to you, perhaps you should look for something else to occupy your pastime.

Nice dissembling answer, Marty.

Correct about everything?

Even when he says Stella Mae Jacob, Gloria Holt and SHaron Simmons on the Pergola Patio in Towner might actually have been men wearing Bermuda shorts, with one of them holding a "Baby Boy Blue"-colored helium-filled balloon?

--  MWT   ;)


« Last Edit: September 29, 2019, 01:59:00 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2019, 01:59:26 AM »
Except I never said that. That’s the story you made up to compensate for your lack of evidence (and decency).

Tom turns every single thread into his unhealthy obsession.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2019, 02:01:25 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2019, 02:13:57 AM »
No, a partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card.

a partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card.

That's true, but that's not the first appearance of the 3 X 5 index card.  That so called "palm Print" which was nothing but an unidentifiable smudge that Lt Day imagined to be a palm print when he first saw it on the wooden foregrip of the rifle. Day knew that the wood would absorb what he thought might be a print so he lifted it just minutes after the rifle was retrieved from BENEATH the pallet.  Tom Alyea watched as Day lifted that smudge and placed it on the 3 X 5 card...

That card is listed among the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at mid-night on 11 / 22 /63.

« Last Edit: September 29, 2019, 03:22:04 AM by Walt Cakebread »