Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Nitpicky Question About The Bag  (Read 31035 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2019, 04:11:21 AM »
Quote from: Walt Cakebread on September 29, 2019, 02:13:57 AM
That's true, but that's not the first appearance of the 3 X 5 index card. 

Yes it was.

Quote
That card is listed among the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at mid-night on 11 / 22 /63.

No, it was on an undated list that you like to pretend was turned over to the FBI on 11/22. The index card was sent separately, days after the other fingerprint evidence was turned over.
Logged

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2019, 02:39:57 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on September 29, 2019, 04:11:21 AM
Yes it was.

No, it was on an undated list that you like to pretend was turned over to the FBI on 11/22. The index card was sent separately, days after the other fingerprint evidence was turned over.

Would you please post the two evidence lists , so we can compare them and discuss them.....
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #23 on: September 29, 2019, 03:04:55 PM »
Quote from: Walt Cakebread on September 29, 2019, 02:39:57 PM
Would you please post the two evidence lists , so we can compare them and discuss them.....

Nothing to discuss. They are undated. Period.
Logged

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #24 on: September 29, 2019, 07:19:17 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on September 29, 2019, 03:04:55 PM
Nothing to discuss. They are undated. Period.

The original list that was compiled on the evening of 11 / 22/ 63 is not dated....But any intelligent person can determine that it was typed up that evening by comparing the two lists.

The photocopy ( altered) of the evidence inventory list  can be seen on page 260 of Vol 24......
   
Warren Commission Hearings, Volume XXIV

Page 260 of 929
    
250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
« Last Edit: September 29, 2019, 08:23:07 PM by Walt Cakebread »
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #25 on: September 29, 2019, 09:04:13 PM »
How does it’s being altered tell you anything about when the first one was written?
Logged

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #26 on: September 29, 2019, 10:39:18 PM »
Quote from: Thomas Graves on September 28, 2019, 11:05:19 PM
The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.
Another coulda-woulda-shoulda...Saw all that in some kind of a transcendental vision? Or is it just the adventitious conjecture of the Oswald did it puppets?
 
 
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Nitpicky Question About The Bag
« Reply #27 on: September 29, 2019, 10:45:20 PM »
Quote from: Jerry Freeman on September 29, 2019, 10:39:18 PM
Another coulda-woulda-shoulda...Saw all that in some kind of a transcendental vision? Or is it just the adventitious conjecture of the Oswald did it puppets?

Yes, it's one in a long series of Lame LN excuses.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
« previous next »