That's a valid point, if it actually is a case of denying free speech, a judge should be able force the EF to reinstate.How far from the bench will you be before you hear him stop laughing at you?
"back in the day.."LOL! No xxxx Bill. PDFs work on both sides of the fence.
Duh, no sh*t. You f'kn OswaldBitches attack everything
You f'kn OswaldBitches attack everything.
when did I do that? - because a judge would laugh at you. I am serious, and my point is...DVP , nor do you, or I, on this forum, has the right to say whatever he/she wants on a medium he/she doesn't own. That is not a valid violation free speech.
As per Mr. Crow's recommendation I dropped by Von P's salvage yard and took a look at three random junk piles (use search function to pick specific number):#193 is prompted by Rob Caprio asking VP to prove Oswald owned a 40.2 inch rifle before proving Oswald lied. The response is essentially a rant with no reference to any evidence to support the VP claims (straight out of the WC report). Link at bottom of pile shows that excerpt originated from a google group and that Caprio responded in detail to the rant; #193 on it's own is utter trash.#809 starts out with a quote by a B. Lecloux (context unknown as Amazon link is dead) presumably related to Bugliosi on the Tippit murder. Standard rant about CTs claiming all evidence is faked which derails into more alleged CT assertions related to the Bethesda autopsy....WTF? Useless trash.#1307 surprise, this pile contained a nugget: link to Ian Griggs' interview with Johnny Brewer. Deep pile related to Postal/Brewer interaction and their description of Oswald, context unknown as link to ED forum is dead. Somehow the discussion digresses into the Carcano/Mauser dispute! VP tries to attribute Postal quote "ruddy looking to me" to Brewer as Postal didn't really see Oswald slip in to the TT. Doesn't really work as Brewer knew Oswald from selling him a pair of shoes and would know he didn't have a ruddy complexion. The Griggs link certainly outweighs the time otherwise wasted.There are currently 1331 of these ASSORTED ARGUMENTS....good luck!
Peter Goth still doesn't "get it". Incredible.
