The Ed Forum is having a total Meltdown and chicken bones!

[David Von Pein]

Feel free to update your archived discussion accordingly with any [of] my quotes and the link.

Thanks.

I'd like to get a working link to what you called "Part 4" of your "Bags & Bones" series. The Part 4 link I have now doesn't work and I can't find a version at the Wayback for that one. (I found Wayback links for Parts 1 thru 3, however, which was nice.)

By any chance, is the text you quoted above the same as some of your "Part 4" article? If so, I could link that on my site as "Part 4", to replace the current dead link.

EDIT: After looking at Colin's synopsis of his "Part 4" article, I assume the above text is not related, because evidently the original "Part 4" pertains to Rowland's & Brennan's statements. But if you (Colin) still have that PART 4 text on your computer, is it possible for you to re-post it on this forum (or maybe in a PDF document I could download)?

[Colin Crow]

Thanks.

I'd like to get a working link to what you called "Part 4" of your "Bags & Bones" series. The Part 4 link I have now doesn't work and I can't find a version at the Wayback for that one. (I found Wayback links for Parts 1 thru 3, however, which was nice.)

By any chance, is the text you quoted above the same as some of your "Part 4" article? If so, I could link that on my site as "Part 4", to replace the current dead link.

EDIT: After looking at Colin's synopsis of his "Part 4" article, I assume the above text is not related, because evidently the original "Part 4" pertains to Rowland's & Brennan's statements. But if you (Colin) still have that PART 4 text on your computer, is it possible for you to re-post it on this forum (or maybe in a PDF document I could download)?

David, now that I remember I decided to approach that topic from a different perspective that the original in the thread I quoted from last year. I do have all parts copied but before I can post I would need to update the picture links that relate to the text. I might try and convert each part into a PDF as you suggest.

[David Von Pein]

I might try and convert each part into a PDF as you suggest.

That would be great. Thanks. (I've recently gained an added affection for PDF files. I'm not really sure why, but I really like the PDF format for some reason.)

[Colin Crow]

That would be great. Thanks. (I've recently gained an added affection for PDF files. I'm not really sure why, but I really like the PDF format for some reason.)

So do you continue to believe Mooney was mistaken given the weight of evidence of the initial existence of the chicken lunch in the SN?

[David Von Pein]

So do you continue to believe Mooney was mistaken given the weight of evidence of the initial existence of the chicken lunch in the SN?

Yes, of course Mooney was mistaken. The proof of that fact is in Bonnie Ray's testimony.

[Colin Crow]

Yes, of course Mooney was mistaken. The proof of that fact is in Bonnie Ray's testimony.

And Harry Weatherford was mistaken too....

Harry Weatherford

The 11-23-63 report of Deputy Sheriff Harry Weatherford notes "I came down to the 6th floor, and while searching this floor, Deputy Luke Mooney said "here are some shells." I went over to where he was and saw 3 expended rifle shells, a sack on the floor and a partially eaten piece of chicken on top of one of the cartons which was used as a sort of barricade."

There are another 5 or so who saw remnants of the lunch in the SN before Fritz arrived. Are they all mistaken too?

Perhaps you can point out how Bonnie Ray's testimony proves they were all mistaken.

[Peter Goth]

In that scenario you'd be working for me.

  right. good one.