The preponderance of the evidence

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 146084 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #91 on: April 02, 2019, 07:28:40 PM »
Oh, so you think his name really was O.H. Lee?

I hope you're sitting down because this will be shocking news to you....  Lee told Fritz right up front that he lived at a rooming hous at 1026 N. Beckley and he was registered there as O.H. Lee....   Fritz didn't learn that from "some officer out in the hall"....as he told the WC,...   He learned that from Lee Oswald....

Perhaps you might should be laying down when I tell you that you just said Fritz was one of the biggest liars. And now you turn around and hang your hat on one of his statements. So which is it? Also, this indicates that LHO knew that he lied to the landlady (in writing btw). So it wasn?t a mistake like I have seen a few people try to argue.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #92 on: April 02, 2019, 07:39:50 PM »
Perhaps you might should be laying down when I tell you that you just said Fritz was one of the biggest liars. And now you turn around and hang your hat on one of his statements. So which is it? Also, this indicates that LHO knew that he lied to the landlady (in writing btw). So it wasn?t a mistake like I have seen a few people try to argue.

Fritz lied and said that he learned that the suspect lived at 1026 N. Beckley "from one of his officers out in the hall"....  But the TRUTH is Lee Oswald told Fritz that he lived at 1026 N Beckley, and he was registered as OH Lee......     

Lee went on to explain to Fritz, that Mrs Roberts the landlady registered him as OH Lee....   

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #93 on: April 02, 2019, 08:18:00 PM »
Fritz lied and said that he learned that the suspect lived at 1026 N. Beckley "from one of his officers out in the hall"....  But the TRUTH is Lee Oswald told Fritz that he lived at 1026 N Beckley, and he was registered as OH Lee......     

Lee went on to explain to Fritz, that Mrs Roberts the landlady registered him as OH Lee....

Oh, I see. Thanks for keeping me straight! That makes all the difference in the world.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #94 on: April 02, 2019, 08:41:43 PM »
Perhaps you might should be laying down when I tell you that you just said Fritz was one of the biggest liars. And now you turn around and hang your hat on one of his statements. So which is it? Also, this indicates that LHO knew that he lied to the landlady (in writing btw). So it wasn?t a mistake like I have seen a few people try to argue.

Fritz:

"One of the officers had told me that he had rented the room on Beckley under the name of O. F. Lee. I asked him why he did this. He said the landlady did it. She didn't understand his name correctly."

Do you have some evidence that he registered himself as "O. H. Lee"?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #95 on: April 02, 2019, 08:52:02 PM »
Fritz:

"One of the officers had told me that he had rented the room on Beckley under the name of O. F. Lee. I asked him why he did this. He said the landlady did it. She didn't understand his name correctly."

Do you have some evidence that he registered himself as "O. H. Lee"?

No the landlady obviously did it. Not the butler.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #96 on: April 02, 2019, 09:02:24 PM »
No the landlady obviously did it. Not the butler.

I'll take that as a "no".

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #97 on: April 02, 2019, 09:17:17 PM »
I'll take that as a "no".

Mr Collins doesn't like evidence that is contrary to the fairy tale that he embraces......

It's obvious that it was NOT  Lee Oswald who was prevaricating ....but it was Will Fritz who was lying.