The preponderance of the evidence

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 145420 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #77 on: March 30, 2019, 06:28:08 AM »
LN True Believers never want to get ?drawn in? to discussing the evidence, because their conclusions aren?t based on the evidence.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #78 on: March 31, 2019, 11:07:15 PM »
As there are more that believe a conspiracy was behind JFK's death than not.....you are probably right! Another theory of yours? CT's are able to breed.....wow.....who would have thought. Then again you are the lone nut guys....must be difficult.

You think that CTs determined that Oswald would be remembered? Like Booth, or Pilate or Cassius and Brutus?

Oswald himself determined that he would be remembered

CTer-breeding produces little CT zombies
@John: Talk about 'true believers', huh
Like Atheist-breeding begets little Atheist zombies
« Last Edit: March 31, 2019, 11:16:35 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #79 on: March 31, 2019, 11:18:36 PM »
Oswald himself determined that he would be remembered

CTer-breeding produces little CT zombies
@John: Talk about 'true believers', huh
Like Atheist-breeding begets little Atheist zombies

Jack Ruby determined that Oswald wouldn?t enjoy the attention.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #80 on: March 31, 2019, 11:22:02 PM »
LN True Believers never want to get ?drawn in? to discussing the evidence, because their conclusions aren?t based on the evidence.

I sure hope the Reptilians don't have a taste for us poor Lemmings

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #81 on: April 01, 2019, 05:40:02 AM »
Oswald himself determined that he would be remembered

CTer-breeding produces little CT zombies
@John: Talk about 'true believers', huh
Like Atheist-breeding begets little Atheist zombies

I sure hope the Reptilians don't have a taste for us poor Lemmings

Is there anyone out there who can translate Chapman?s incoherent ramblings into English?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #82 on: April 01, 2019, 07:06:24 AM »
Jack Ruby determined that Oswald wouldn?t enjoy the attention.

Good one.

And Ruby should be celebrated by conspiracy-mongers everywhere for giving them something to live all these 56yrs

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #83 on: April 02, 2019, 10:48:22 AM »
Some people are more reasonable than others. And some cannot be reasoned with about much of anything. Anyway, I thought that a definition of a reasonable person from the dictionary might be helpful.

rea?son?a?ble
/ˈrēz(ə)nəb(ə)l/
 Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: reasonable
1.
(of a person) having sound judgment; fair and sensible.
"no reasonable person could have objected"
synonyms:   sensible, rational, open to reason, full of common sense, logical, fair, fair-minded, just, equitable, decent; More
intelligent, wise, levelheaded, practical, realistic;
based on good sense, sound, judicious, well thought out, well grounded, reasoned, well reasoned, valid, commonsensical, advisable, well advised;
tenable, plausible, feasible, credible, acceptable, admissible, believable, viable
"a reasonable man"
antonyms:   unreasonable, illogical