Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Rifle Capability  (Read 21168 times)

Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2019, 09:20:45 AM »
Advertisement
All of this speculation about Oswald's rifle capability is a red herring.  All of the evidence found indicated that it was Oswald alone who shot and killed JFK. Regardless of how he scored in the firing test while in the USMC, how many times Oswald worked the bolt to  familiarize himself with the weapon, how many times he managed to practice with the rifle while in New Orleans, whether you believe Marina, the accuracy of the MC with and without using the scope (nobody knows if Oswald actually used the scope), the actual timeline of the sequence of shots if the first shot missed could be as long as over 8 seconds, the evidence strongly supports the fact that it was Oswald who was the SN shooter. NO OTHER SUSPECT HAS BEEN FOUND WHO COULD HAVE BEEN THE SHOOTER! Oswald pulled the trigger three times, missed the first shot, scored a hit on JFK that went through his neck, out his throat, entered JBC as the 6.5 mm WC copper jacketed bullet was beginning to yaw at approx. Z224, went out JBC's chest, struck his right wrist, and made a small puncture wound in his left thigh. That bullet, CE-399, was recovered at Parkland Hospital and accounts for two (the other being CE-567 and CE-569) of the three bullets fired. It's that freaking fu****g simple, yet you dumb a** commie loving, wife beating, turncoat Oswald defenders just refuse to face the facts just as the dumb a** Flat Earth believers refuse to believe in what is the most obvious of facts. 

In order to support the myriad of theories to cast doubt on Oswald's guilt you fail each and every time in providing an alternate theory backed by reasonable evidence to support the theory that Oswald was not the shooter. Every time some half a***d unreasonable point is brought out by you guys it's countered by reasonable, effective, and verifiable evidence that completely shuts the door to further inquiry but you still persist because your life revolves around trying proving the unprovable by inventing unsupportable scenarios. It's your life and you can live it as you choose but you will never be at peace with yourselves because you're emotionally glued to a lost cause.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2019, 09:20:45 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2019, 04:21:08 PM »
All of this speculation about Oswald's rifle capability is a red herring.
   On and on with the official hymn....seems quite upset. Try Prozac for that anxiety.
 

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #42 on: February 27, 2019, 05:59:56 PM »
Marina Oswald testified that in New Orleans in May of 1963, she observed Oswald sitting with the rifle on their screened porch at night, sighting with the telescopic lens and operating the bolt.

That claim is not supported by Marina's actual testimony, which Jerry posted earlier.  This is why you shouldn't believe claims made in the WC Report without checking their sources.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #42 on: February 27, 2019, 05:59:56 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #43 on: February 27, 2019, 06:01:02 PM »
If the scope became somehow misaligned before the shooting started, it doesn't make sense that any attempt would be made to use it.

Why would you assume the shooter knew it was misaligned?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2019, 06:04:34 PM »
All of this speculation about Oswald's rifle capability is a red herring.  All of the evidence found indicated that it was Oswald alone who shot and killed JFK. Regardless of how he scored in the firing test while in the USMC, how many times Oswald worked the bolt to  familiarize himself with the weapon, how many times he managed to practice with the rifle while in New Orleans, whether you believe Marina, the accuracy of the MC with and without using the scope (nobody knows if Oswald actually used the scope), the actual timeline of the sequence of shots if the first shot missed could be as long as over 8 seconds, the evidence strongly supports the fact that it was Oswald who was the SN shooter. NO OTHER SUSPECT HAS BEEN FOUND WHO COULD HAVE BEEN THE SHOOTER! Oswald pulled the trigger three times, missed the first shot, scored a hit on JFK that went through his neck, out his throat, entered JBC as the 6.5 mm WC copper jacketed bullet was beginning to yaw at approx. Z224, went out JBC's chest, struck his right wrist, and made a small puncture wound in his left thigh. That bullet, CE-399, was recovered at Parkland Hospital and accounts for two (the other being CE-567 and CE-569) of the three bullets fired.

That's the narrative.  What's the "strongly supporting" evidence?

Quote
It's that freaking fu****g simple, yet you dumb a** commie loving, wife beating, turncoat Oswald defenders just refuse to face the facts just as the dumb a** Flat Earth believers refuse to believe in what is the most obvious of facts.

What a rational, convincing, evidence-based argument! 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2019, 06:04:34 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #45 on: February 27, 2019, 08:09:43 PM »
Quote
#@**& It's that freaking fu****g simple, yet you dumb a** commie loving, wife beating, turncoat Oswald defenders just refuse to face the facts just as the dumb a** Flat Earth believers refuse to believe in what is the most obvious of facts. **#^#
What a rational, convincing, evidence-based argument!
A condition we could call conspiraphobia. Caused by repetitive incantations-- "Oswald did it".."It was Oswald's rifle".."Oswald panicked".."he killed the cop" etc.

 

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2019, 08:16:53 PM »
That's the narrative.  What's the "strongly supporting" evidence?

What a rational, convincing, evidence-based argument!

I'm wondering if you're claiming that practice time with a specific weapon is unimportant
« Last Edit: February 27, 2019, 08:24:04 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2019, 08:16:53 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #47 on: February 27, 2019, 08:27:54 PM »
Why would you assume the shooter knew it was misaligned?

Where did I claim that