Joe Rogan says it best
(https://i.postimg.cc/59KXSJvR/DEAD-MAN-CLONE.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
--------
BONUS
--------
(https://i.postimg.cc/HLgfdR8z/CT-IDEAL-LINEUP.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
-------------------------
FROM 'THE HITS-JUST-
KEEP-ON-COMIN' DEPT
-------------------------
(https://i.postimg.cc/2S8vqFLD/4-KILLERS.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
I believe that Buell was a guest speaker at the Sixth Floor Museum recently. And he reportedly expanded on some of his more “recent revelations.” ::)
#KINGOFTRASH -- what a match!
Thumb1:
(https://i.postimg.cc/brQNSjkD/CT-GARBAGE.png)
"artwork" -- ROFLMAO
Sorry for disturbing your trash.
No hard feelings?
Thumb1:
(https://i.postimg.cc/brQNSjkD/CT-GARBAGE.png)
He has a point, Otto. You shouldn't mess with his "artwork" when he provides the best means to dispose of it with it.
And since he still owes me for using my copyrighted material without my permission (screenshots are so handy), I'll give him an opportunity to sue me for using his "artwork" without permission.
Sorry for disturbing your trash.
No hard feelings?
Thumb1:
"artwork" -- ROFLMAO
You can be suspended from the forum
And why the quotes around artist all the time
Wait, what... still no names, JAQer?
You can be suspended from the forum
So what?
And why the quotes around artist all the time
Could it be because you simply are no artist?
Could it be that my geographical positioning (to the far shores of the lunatic fringe) of your precious mountain/ocean view is the real reason for this latest rant of yours?
The fact that you had to ask....
ROFLMAO
Thumb1:
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZqXKw8j1/Dead-Oswald-COCKROACH.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
Are you seeing mountains and oceans where there aren't any?
he was a cock-a-roacha. ask any tutsi.
No matter, wherever you live will always be on the far shoes of the lunatic fringe
I believe that Buell was a guest speaker at the Sixth Floor Museum recently. And he reportedly expanded on some of his more “recent revelations.” ::)I was able to spend three days in Dealey Plaza, my first visit during the anniversary. Buell Frazier had a video recorded “conversation” with Stephen Fagin of the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza on the 7th floor November 22. I understand the video will be placed on YouTube at some time.
I was able to spend three days in Dealey Plaza, my first visit during the anniversary. Buell Frazier had a video recorded “conversation” with Stephen Fagin of the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza on the 7th floor November 22. I understand the video will be placed on YouTube at some time.
Notes about Frazier’s actions after the shots – not described until published in his book “Steering Truth” (JH I bought the autographed book, but have not yet read about this event). Stephen Fagin began this next recollection by noting that Frazier had not discussed the gunman with anyone for over 50 years.
Shots reverb. Motor cycle cops shutting off/restarting bikes to create backfire.
Thought 1st shot as MC backfire, but realized later backfires were shots.
Billy Lovelady and Bill Shelley went down toward the TUP to see what happened.
Tremendous amount of people on sidewalk then, like sardines in a can.
Frazier stood on steps a short time, then decided he would try to find Lovelady and Shelley.
Out in front of this building (TSBD) used to be “angled parking” (JH probably behind the pergola).
Frazier walked to somewhere in the area of the angled parking looked up and saw a man with a rifle.
Frazier was terrified.
Man was not a policeman or detective.
Man was very well dressed high quality, down to his shoes. Shoes probably cost several hundred dollars, back then! Discussed clothing with his friend Jim Leavelle. Man’s fedora and clothing immaculate.
Man looks at him with a cold look, Frazier frightened
Put rifle in “the back seat of his car” parked at the angled parking, and then he closed the “trunk”. Man turned to open his door to get in car. Frazier turned and walked back toward the doorway.
Frazier did not stop at steps but walked to the corner of Houston/Elm.
Turned to his left, and there near the dock was LHO, walking along the side of the building. Oswald was not in a hurry, got abut 10 feet to Frazier, but turned to the crosswalk across Houston street.
Then Oswald crossed across Elm street. While about half way across Elm someone spoke to Frazier. He did not recognize the voice. From that point Frazier lost sight of Oswald.
Frazier then went down to the basement for his lunch.
Joe Rogan says it best
Yes, he was there in person. I was there early when only a few people were there and got to spend a minute or two with him.
To be clear, it is only the gunman tale that was recently revealed. I believe his story about seeing LHO outside the building has been around for some time.
Did you catch where the gunman put the gun in "the back seat of the car" but meant the "trunk", I think?
PSA
(https://i.postimg.cc/QtmyJk1n/GO-TO-HELL.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
What? Santa Claus did it?
And who is this spokesperson? Do you have his contact information?
Is this a game of "believe in me and I will tell you to believe that Santa Claus did it"?
(https://i.postimg.cc/x1Svfbjp/HE-SHOT-THAT-MAN.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
For ever and ever, slam dunk
PMS
Weidmann: And why did Santa Claus do it while playing basketball?
_reference 'Invisible gorilla'
(https://i.postimg.cc/P5XzYK2D/BASKETBALL-OSWALD.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
I'm not your parent.
Textbook psychotic behavior.
Thumb1:
As usual, you're not making any sense.
You've got Santa Claus playing basketball with trolls you can't see and what the invisible gorilla reference means is incomprehensible. Could it be you're just seeing things that aren't there?
Pay attention: You brought up the basketball reference which leads directly to the 'Invisible Gorilla' tests that you and iacoletti jumped on me about a few years ago.
Again, try to concentrate.
I am paying attention. You, not so much.
I didn't bring up the basketball reference. You did with Santa Claus' slam dunk, or have you already forgotten that?
Here's a question for you; how do you manage to see an "invisible gorilla"? Perhaps in the same way as you saw your invisible friend when you were growing up?
I came up with 'Slam dunk' (even designed a logo for it) several months ago
You call that 'paying attention' on your part? You are actually easily distracted and the man in the gorilla suit would be visible to you.
And you trolls are invisible since you cannot name names.. and instead only play games
I came up with 'Slam dunk'
No you didn't. The term 'Slam dunk' has been around for as long as I can remember and even longer. Again, you are trying to take credit for something somebody else came up with. Shame on you.
You call that 'paying attention' on your part?
Sure, do you really think I read all your posts?
You are actually easily distracted and the man in the gorilla suit would be visible to you.
You're all over the place, yet again. First you babble about an invisible gorilla, now you show a picture of a gorilla which anybody can see without paying much attention at all and then you suddenly are ranting on about a man inside a gorilla suit. How can I see a man when he is hiding in a suit?
And you trolls are invisible since you cannot name names..
And it gets even worse. How can somebody be invisible by not naming names? I haven't named names for a long time but I am still visible. How can you be so confused?
and instead only play games
Like the gang of 12 game, you mean? Or the one where you spot an invisible gorilla during a slam dunk?
I have no idea what you are talking about, but that's no real surprise as I outgrew playing games a long time ago.
I came up with 'Slam dunk'
No you didn't. The term 'Slam dunk' has been around for as long as I can remember and even longer. Again, you are trying to take credit for something somebody else came up with. Shame on you.
_You're playing games. I'm taking credit for using the age-old basketball term to express my opinion that it was indeed a 'slam dunk' that Oswald was the killer. You do realize that it's Oswald's head in that logo...right?
You call that 'paying attention' on your part?
Sure, do you really think I read all your posts?
_How is that paying attention, exactly
You are actually easily distracted and the man in the gorilla suit would be visible to you.
You're all over the place, yet again. First you babble about an invisible gorilla, now you show a picture of a gorilla which anybody can see without paying much attention at all and then you suddenly are ranting on about a man inside a gorilla suit. How can I see a man when he is hiding in a suit?
_If you had any clue at all about the intent of the 'Invisible Gorilla' experiments, you would be able to answer all that yourself
And you trolls are invisible since you cannot name names..
And it gets even worse. How can somebody be invisible by not naming names? I haven't named names for a long time but I am still visible. How can you be so confused?
_You lot are—for all intents and purposes—invisible by default due to your scurrying down your individual rabbit holes when faced with the task of attaching names to claims that would, according to you brainiacs, prove a conspiracy and a second shooter. Stop JAQing around.
Like the gang of 12 game, you mean? Or the one where you spot an invisible gorilla during a slam dunk?
I have no idea what you are talking about, but that's no real surprise as I outgrew playing games a long time ago._
_I'm sure Oswald didn't think it was a game to be caught with his pants down with 24 eyeballs watching his every move
_Gave up playing games: Seems like you're out of remission, Slick.
"The sisters"
What sisters?
ROFL
I'm taking credit for using the age-old basketball term to express my opinion that it was indeed a 'slam dunk' that Oswald was the killer.
BS:
You were caught lying again.
Provide evidence
Here's mine
(https://i.postimg.cc/gkVGcxHc/OSWALD-SLAM-DUNK-LOGO.png)
DOH
They were not sisters.
Busted again, Sheriff.
Artistic licence. Close enough.
Lets see you fit 'sisters-in-law' on that line
Everything you get and do wrong is "artistic licence" to you, when it has already been established that you are only an "artist" in your own mind.
Btw who are those girls in the picture? Did you infringe on somebody's rights again?
My graphic posts alone establish my artistic capabilities
Where have you established otherwise..
Except for being a pathological liar you haven't established anything.
Oh, thanks for taking the bait!
Thumb1:
My graphic posts alone establish my artistic capabilities
BS A teenager can do what you have done. There is nothing special or artistic about it.
Except for being a pathological liar you haven't established anything.
Oh, thanks for taking the bait!
Thumb1:
Oh, thanks for taking the bait!
Like taking candy from a baby
No, just morons.
Enhances the enjoyment.
Thanks so much for your participation.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda..
Nothing special or artistic about spewing out endless CT word-salads
So you feel you have to bait people
Thanks so much for your always-useful posts
So you take candy from babies
You seem the type
So you bait each other. Weird.
We have on record who choked on the bait, genius!
I even gave you a chance to back out.
As usual you were too ignorant and too sloppy to get even the simple stuff right.
We have on record who choked on the bait, genius!
I even gave you a chance to back out.
As usual you were too ignorant and too sloppy to get even the simple stuff right.
We have on record who choked on the bait, genius!
Thumb1:
His most recent posts confirm it.
You lost in every one of those exchanges
So now you claim them as 'baits'
Back out on what
More delusions of grandeur.... What happened to you in the past that you need to overcompensate so desperately now?
Why don't you understand that a loser who is projecting is still a loser?
Btw, I never claimed anything as 'baits'. You are confused again.
Ignorance is bliss, even when it is feigned to disguise a total lack of grip on reality, right?
When are you going to prove a conspiracy brought down Kennedy and a second shooter was involved?
Beck: We have on record who choked on the bait, genius!
Weidmann: His most recent posts confirm it.
_You are therefore party to the idea of 'baiting'
Why are you trying to change the subject?
If you and your ilk had presented a more credible, believable and persuasive case against Oswald as a lone gunman, there wouldn't be any talk of a conspiracy.
So, let's try there, shall we.... You claim Oswald is guilty and he did it alone. Now prove it!
Only in a delusional mind.
Why are you trying to change the subject?
_What subject... you and your partner so desperately taking potshots at me?
If you and your ilk had presented a more credible, believable and persuasive case against Oswald as a lone gunman, there wouldn't be any talk of a conspiracy.
_the 12 witnesses who caught Oswald with his hand in the cookie jar nailed it for me.
So, let's try there, shall we.... You claim Oswald is guilty and he did it alone. Now prove it!
_I go by what witnesses saw. Around Patton for instance. No reason to believe CTer Twilight Zone fare or your HateSpeak.
Only in a delusional mind.
_Best save your nothingburgers for mealtime
No need to show you've lost grip on reality. We already know.
What cookie jar? And what has a cookie jar to do with assassination of President Kennedy?
Who cares what witnesses saw "around Patton"?
And are you so naive as to believe that witnesses get everything right all the time?
So, you call your delusional mind a nothingburger? Works for me Thumb1:
No need to show you've lost grip on reality. We already know.
_You need to show how your version of reality means anything at all to others
What cookie jar? And what has a cookie jar to do with assassination of President Kennedy?
_Cookie jar: aka known by any teenager as 'caught red-handed'. And Oswald rosetta-stoned Kennedy in the process of doing exactly what you clowns said he didn't do.
Who cares what witnesses saw "around Patton"?
_Typical Weidmann 'I don't care' cop-out
And are you so naive as to believe that witnesses get everything right all the time?
_Only Markham needed if the jury believes her, Tootsie
_And slam dunk if even only one witness saw Dirty Harvey brandishing the gun on his way out of the kill zone
So, you call your delusional mind a nothingburger? Works for me Thumb1
_Want fries with all those nothingburgers you've posted in this 'Dead Oswald Tour' initiative of mine, Chucky?
Just because you say so? I don't think so.
Oswald wasn't a teenager and was there really a rosetta-stone in that cookie jar?
No cop-out at all. Witnesses "around Patton" didn't see Tippit being shot.
I'll just take that to mean that your answer to my question is no, you don't believe that all witnesses get everything right all the time. So, there goes all the gang of 12 BS down the drain! Thumb1:
As for Markham, I seriously doubt any prosecutor would dare to put her on the stand.
Btw, I think you've got it backwards. For a guilty verdict all 12 jurors need to be convinced. So much for your "slam dunk" BD
I'm glad we have now established that you do indeed call your delusional mind a nothingburger.
As far as that "initiative" is concerned, I think you would do a lot of people a big favor by not showing any more initiative in the future.
Just because you say so? I don't think so.
_IOW you cannot prove your version of reality superior to anyone else's
Oswald wasn't a teenager and was there really a rosetta-stone in that cookie jar?
_ Where did I claim Oswald himself was the teenager. My 'teenager' references your ignorant claim that 'any teenager' could do what I do graphically here.
I don't cop-out at all. Witnesses "around Patton" didn't see Tippit being shot.
_You just copped out again by implying that everyone there would have had to seen the actual ambush in order to convict. You're copping out again by ignoring the fact that several ppl ID'd Oswald as the man carrying/brandishing the gun.
I'll just take that to mean that your answer to my question is no, you don't believe that all witnesses get everything right all the time. So, there goes all the gang of 12 BS down the drain! Thumb1:
_ Are you sitting on that thumb? How does 3-4 'not sure' out of the 15 ppl who saw him send 'The12' down the drain, Chucky?
As for Markham, I seriously doubt any prosecutor would dare to put her on the stand.
_Did I ask for your opinion about what you 'seriously doubt', Slick?
Btw, I think you've got it backwards. For a guilty verdict all 12 jurors need to be convinced. So much for your "slam dunk" BD
_BTW, keep thinking
_The 'slam dunk' springs naturally from:
Markham's view to a kill
The Gang's view of Oswald w/revolver
I'm glad we have now established that you do indeed call your delusional mind a nothingburger.
As far as that "initiative" is concerned, I think you would do a lot of people a big favor by not showing any more initiative in the future.
_You are an expert at not showing initiative. All y'all. Six decades and counting. Booyah.
BTW:
Tme for your next post. I even anticipated what you would say
(https://i.postimg.cc/kg4rsN42/1200x0.jpg)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
Donations rolling in, Sheriff?
:D :D :D :D :D
Let me do my best LN impression; Yes I can prove it but I can't be bothered
Where did I say that you claimed Oswald himself was a/the teenager?
And of course any teenager could do the 'artwork' you post here.
I implied nothing of the kind and stating an actual and obvious fact isn't a cop out. I would have loved to see all those witnesses on the stand, being completely destroyed by a good defense lawyer.
Sometimes I wonder what goes on in your confused mind, but then the next moment I decide I really do not want to know.
Nobody is talking about 3-4 out of 15. The 3-4 you refer to where not part of the 12 I was refering to. I'm truly sorry that you simply don't understand my comment, but I can't dumb it down even more than I have already done.
No, I just gave it to you for free, just like you keep on pestering people on a daily basis with opinions that nobody asked you for.
Which only shows how superficial you truly are.
You have no idea what I am an expert in or not.
Fool, you forgot the burger.
Hey dummy a 'nothing burger' means there's nothing, no meat just the bun.
Really? No meat and just the bun would make it a nothing bun, wouldn't it?
What you originally posted, when you claimed to have anticipated what I would say next, was just a bun, which to normal people is only that; A BUN!
But that was not your only error. You apparently figured what I would say next was "a bun", when I had no intention of saying that.
You appear to have understood the mistake you made, as you later added the "blablabla" stuff. Too bad that I had already copied the original picture! :D
Appearances can be deceiving, I intended to post the one to which I added type, but found the first one I posted was larger original instead. Either one works because all you say sounds like blabla anyway
Appearances can be deceiving, I intended to post the one to which I added type, but found the first one I posted the larger original instead. Either one works because all you say sounds like blabla anyway
Not much backup from Deputy Jerry!
ROFLMAO
All I'm reading are pathetic excuses for silly errors made you keep on making and of course blablabla
And you have no idea how I sound when I say anything. Get a grip, you're all over the place
You sound like this: Blablabla
All I'm reading are pathetic excuses for silly errors made you keep on making and of course blablabla
And you have no idea how I sound when I say anything. Get a grip, you're all over the place
Make up your mind;
First you want proof then when I post it you don't
Note that the two time-stamped images were processed in the sequence I claimed
(https://i.postimg.cc/QCD58Xtv/NO-TEXT.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/HWPd16h9/NB-w-type.png)
Really? No meat and just the bun would make it a nothing bun, wouldn't it?
What you originally posted, when you claimed to have anticipated what I would say next, was just a bun, which to normal people is only that; A BUN!
But that was not your only error. You apparently figured what I would say next was "a bun", when I had no intention of saying that.
You appear to have understood the mistake you made, as you later added the "blablabla" stuff. Too bad that I had already copied the original picture! :D
Dang, you missed Trash Tuesday again!
It very disrespectful to dump your waste on this forum.
Stop littering!
(https://i.postimg.cc/3rdb21fv/BLEDSOE-OSWALD.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
Um, too bad for whom... are you accusing me of lying by any chance?
I already stated what happened
Again my intention was to use the text but inadvertently
processed the larger one.
===================
Aside from that, this is how nothing-burger is depicted
NO BURGER Einstein
(https://i.postimg.cc/fR4GSS4S/buns.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/MpmzWmcp/BUNS-02.png)
It doesn't matter how a nothing-burger is depicted elsewhere. And besides, most of the pictures you have now posted have text inbetween the two parts of the bun.
You just posted a picture of a bun. That's all!
As usual, too weak and too late.
I came up with the 'stay inside' joke waaay back so your comeback attempt is straight up pathetic - - DOH
Your soggy burger bun bunglings exposed by Martin surely hurt!
Easily recognized?
I do not recognize Bledsoe or Roberts or the Davis sister-in laws and others in your pictures.
Except for Oswald, none of the people in the pictures have anything to do with this case. Have you been "borrowing" other people's pictures?
As usual, too weak and too late.
_Too late for what? Not my bad if you are so anxious to hear back from me..
I came up with the 'stay inside' joke waaay back so your comeback attempt is straight up pathetic - - DOH
_So that was supposed be a joke, huh..hard to tell since you&yours seem so into #ctHate#Speak hereabouts
Your soggy burger bun bunglings exposed by Martin surely hurt!
_Don't call me Shirley
You should be more worried about the testimonies than the extras, Chucky..
_Don't call me Shirley
Who is this Shirley that's not supposed to call you? Another extra, perhaps, Dolly?
For crying out loud, who brings extras to a murder?
You are some piece of work
Might be that lipstick of yours causing the confusion, Cherif.
@The GongShowDuo
re: 'Don't call me Shirley'
_What boat did you chuckleheads just jump off of
_What turnip truck were you just get kicked off of
_If you don't know who Leslie Nielsen is I'm going to fk.n kill you
Now buckle up and get a clue
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
Who is Leslie Nielsen?
Was he Shirley's son "OAB"?
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
High praise coming from the master troll.
But c'mon now, you can't call us "chuckleheads" without showing us just how superior you (feel you) are.
So, "saint of all troll hunters", who is Leslie Nielsen and what does he have to do with Oswald?
And you surely aren't suggesting that Shirley had anything to do with any of this, are you?
Yeah, she does:
-----------------------
Don't call me, Shirley
Don't call me Shirley
------------------------
Still can't figure the
difference out, Punchy?
'The Saint of All Troll Hunters'
Who me? Nah, you have to be
dead to be sainted
Amazing. The essence of my question went straight over your head..... Hilarious.
You are not making sense. In your gif you write: "Guest spokesperson: The Saint of All Troll Hunters"
If you have to be dead to be sainted, how can a dead person be "Guest spokeperson"?
The essence of my question went straight over your head..... Hilarious.
_Essence d'Merde
_Straight to nowhere
_Yes it is
If you have to be dead to be sainted, how can a dead person be "Guest spokeperson"?
_Try to keep up; it's right in front of you
Straight to nowhere = Straight to your brain? You haven't got a clue, have you now?
Yes, I saw it. But as I am a chucklehead why don't you explain it to me?
Have you noticed my 'box of laughs' logo by any chance
Yes I did, but I didn't pay much attention considering it's origin and besides I was far more concentrating on my question who Leslie Nielsen is....
I hate to think what your origins might be
Some witness you've got yourself, Sheriff!
Thumb1:
You think?
blablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablabla
Wrong, you're wearing your skirt upside down.
So what?
YOU trash talk Guinyard AND gives him a thumbs-up!
Deranged Nutter logic.
YOUR demented dialogue makes a fool of your star witness.
YOU give him the thumbs up.
Double DOH!
Both you (Gr8) and he (Gr5) are the fools
Consider yourself waxed & polished off
Consider yourself waxed & polished off
Said Grumpy a couple of day before Xmas. What a nice guy.... ::)
Says the atheist
No wonder your brain is still bleeding trying to grasp how you screwed up.
Can't wait to see Guinyard & The Davis Sisters blown up to billboard size.
Oh wait, no donations yet?
Squeak, squeak...
(https://i.postimg.cc/CM3C5sQX/THE-ONION-OSWALD.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
Your primary source?
Would explain a lot...
You lot are my primary source..
If that's true, you're clearly not listening or, alternatively, incapable of comprehension.
LOL. Get over yourself. My source is the high-prick&asshole-content amongst you chuckleheads
So, you're going with incapable of comprehension... Got it Thumb1:
No.. I'm going with —for instance — the witnesses that saw Oswald fumbling with the gun on Patton
Now you are confusing people again.
How does this have anything to do with the "high-prick&asshole-content amongst you chuckleheads"?
No confusion about who saw Dirty Harvey on Patton, Slick..
Only in your confused mind
No, in witness reality:
There is no cure for stupidity.
I can never convince a fool that he is a fool, because even the biggest fool thinks he is intelligent.
So, I won't bother.
There is no cure for stupidity.
_ Kudos to your parents for at least trying
Did you think I was talking about you?
So, there is some self-knowledge there after all. :D
It seems your parents never even tried.
Merry Xmas, Grumpy!
Yours should have been neutered, obviously.
(https://i.postimg.cc/DwpSCpSh/SHRINK-CITY-001.png)
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/6p19yk1R/YELLOW-PSA-ABP.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/L6ZXcv56/JFK-LOGO.png)
Oh, look at the poor puppy...
All alone during the holiday period, with nothing better to do than creating and posting meaningless gifs to desperately get some attention.
That's bad enough, by itself, but then he calls Otto a Nazi, tells me I am grosely insincere for saying Merry Xmas to him twice and to top it all off he claims to be born "clever, talented, and modest" without actually understanding that those claims do not go hand in hand.
A truly modest man would never call himself clever and talented and a clever man would understand that calling himself modest is the best proof of a total lack of modesty.
Poor Chappy had so much time on his hand over the holiday period and he still couldn't get anything right...... Oh well.
Happy new year, Bill Thumb1:
Again with the gross insincerity. ::)
A truly modest man would never call himself clever and talented and a clever man would understand that calling himself modest is the best proof of a total lack of modesty.
_LOL. You wouldn't just happen be calling yourself clever, talented and modest by any chance, now would you, Chucky?
Meaningless gifs
_LOL: You wouldn't just happen to be calling witness testimony 'meaningless' by any chance, now would you..
Again with the gross insincerity. ::)
Says the paranoid grumpy puppy.....
_LOL. You wouldn't just happen be calling yourself clever, talented and modest by any chance, now would you, Chucky?
No. I'm not dumb or insecure enough to do something that stupid.
_LOL: You wouldn't just happen to be calling witness testimony 'meaningless' by any chance, now would you..
No, but I would call witness testimony the least reliable type of evidence and just about everybody who knows anything about it agrees with that. And that btw includes quite a few LNs as well!
What is indeed meaningless are gifs that take already unreliable testimony out of context and thus misrepresent the evidence for the sole purpose of misleading the most gullible people, as they will never convince anybody who knows anything about this case.
But witness testimony, nevertheless
Several up close & personal btw
Out of what 'context' by the way?
His cold-blooded murder of officer Tippit?
No. I'm not dumb or insecure enough to do something that stupid
_But dumb & insecure nevertheless
But witness testimony, nevertheless
Several up close & personal btw
Oh, the desperation.... no matter how you spin it, it's still the most unreliable kind of evidence
No. I'm not dumb or insecure enough to do something that stupid
_But dumb & insecure nevertheless
Says the guy who proved beyond doubt to be dumb and insecure enough to call himself "clever, talented, and modest"
Oh, the desperation.... no matter how you spin it, it's still the most unreliable kind of evidence
_Your head seems to be what is doing the 360-degree thing here. How many witnesses do you need? A dozen? A baker's dozen?
Says the guy who proved beyond doubt to be dumb and insecure enough to call himself "clever, talented, and modest
_Are you sure I'm not just egging you on, Professor?
Oh, the desperation.... no matter how you spin it, it's still the most unreliable kind of evidence
_Your head seems to be what is doing the 360-degree thing here. How many witnesses do you need? A dozen? A baker's dozen?
Stop being stupid. Just ask any mathematician what the odds are that all the witnesses at a fair and correct line up identify the same person. His answer will show you that your argument is utterly flawed and works against you, because it's a mathematical impossibility that all the witnesses identify the same person at a properly conducted line up.
Or is that over your head, peanut?
Says the guy who proved beyond doubt to be dumb and insecure enough to call himself "clever, talented, and modest
_Are you sure I'm not just egging you on, Professor?
Nah, you're just looking for a way to save face again....
::)
Appeal to Authority
Beating the odds happens every day
Watch the news sometime
Appeal to Authority
So, dismissal it is.... No surprise. Fits your profile perfectly.
Chappy, the self-proclaimed "clever, talented, and modest" fool who doesn't understand that he just reduced all his gifs to a reproduction of his own misguided opinion, based on the biggest appeal to authority ever. Thumb1:
Beating the odds happens every day
Indeed. Whenever I think you couldn't get any more stupid and ignorant, you prove me wrong... time after time
Watch the news sometime
Nah, I have a life and better things to do..... Did you get in touch with a mathematician yet, or do you prefer to remain uneducated?
_You have now acquired a good deal of egg on your second face
_You are pitting your speculations against people who were actually at Patton Ground Zero
_You have practically dismissed The Gang of 15 as not being important
One's eyebrows remain raised
(https://i.postimg.cc/Z5v9XQL2/LEWIS-OSWALD.png)
Lewis never identified the person he saw as Oswald.
Yet another failure.
Lewis never identified the person he saw as Oswald.
Yet another failure.
Try to keep up and show us where I included Lewis in TheFab11
(https://i.postimg.cc/c4GGjQtq/15-GANG-MARKHAM.png)
Try to keep up and show us where I included Lewis in TheFab11
So in fact Lewis saw the same man others ID'd as Oswald
Who said my observation about your Lewis "artwork" had anything to do with your "gang of 15"....er I mean 11
My latest gang presentation clearly does not include Lewis as one of those who ID'd Oswald
That's clown logic. I could just as easily argue that Patterson saw the same man that others were unable to identify as Oswald.
"ID'd"...LOL
They were shown a single mugshot of the well-known Oswald months after the fact. That's even more unfair and biased than the unfair and biased in-person lineups with fillers that looked nothing like Oswald or the witness descriptions.
Tatum...LOL. Not only did he never do an official identification -- nobody else even remembers him being there that day.
Nobody knows anymore what the hell you are doing. You've put so much BS on this forum in such a short period of time that it is virtually impossible to make sense of any of it, if anybody actually wanted to do that, which I seriously doubt.
You are so all over the place that I would not be surprised if you, yourself, wouldn't a clue. In fact, it is beyond obvious that you don't.
Who cares?... Easy answer; NOBODY
Again with the speculation..
Who cares?
_And yet here you are.. again
Anybody could claim that they were in their car at that time. Not at all surprised that Chapman is willing to just take somebody's word for it, as long as they say what he likes.
As for Benavides:
Mr. BENAVIDES - Later on that evening, about 4 o'clock, there was two officers came by and asked for me, Mr. Callaway asked me---I had told them that I had seen the officer, and the reporters were there and I was trying to hide from the reporters because they will just bother you all the time.
Then I found out that they thought this was the guy that killed the President. At the time I didn't know the President was dead or he had been shot.
I was just trying to hide from the reporters and everything, and these two officers came around and asked me if I'd seen him, and I told him yes, and told them what I had seen, and they asked me if I could identify him, and I said I don't think I could. At this time I was sure, I wasn't sure that I could or not. I wasn't going to say I could identify and go down and couldn't have.
Mr. BELIN - Did he ever take you to the police station and ask you if you could identify him?
Mr. BENAVIDES - No; they didn't.
Funny what you wrongly percieve to be speculation. :D
I find a clown's performance in a circus entertaining, but I couldn't care less if he performed or not.
Having said that, when he performs his meaningless silliness is always good for a laugh.....
Anybody could claim that they were in their car at that time. Not at all surprised that Chapman is willing to just take somebody's word for it, as long as they say what he likes.
_I have no reason to call Tatum a liar
One can see in the video that Benavides had no doubt that he could ID Oswald
I also have no reason to call him a liar.
Mr. BELIN - Did he ever take you to the police station and ask you if you could identify him?
Mr. BENAVIDES - No; they didn't.
_So what?
Aha! So you do find the Patton Ground Zero witness testimonies meaningless!
Once again, thanks so much for your always-useful posts.
The desperation by which you fight against the odds to keep your little fairytale fantasy alive is hilarious.
You really need to take a step back and ask yourself just how many people are in jail right now for a crime they did not commit, because of flawed eye-witness testimony and/or prosecutorial misconduct. Especially in Texas the track record of one Henry Wade is extremely poor. Just ask Barry Scheck
https://innocenceproject.org/all-cases/
Aha! So you do find the Patton Ground Zero witness testimonies meaningless!
Where did I say that?
Couldn't you even figure out that the clown and his meaningless silliness I was talking about was you? Oh boy...
You really are a confused puppy.....
Appeal to Authority
And you are practically dismissing the Patton Ground Zero witnesses as liars
Oswald wouldn't qualify for TIP help
Too many 'eyes on' at Patton
Hey Chucky, tell us what's 'silly' about posting witness statements
_I have no reason to call Tatum a liar
One can see in the video that Benavides had no doubt that he could ID Oswald
Aha! So you do find the Patton Ground Zero witness testimonies meaningless!
Appeal to Authority
Which only tells me you don't understand the fallacy. People being released from wrongful conviction is factual.
And you are practically dismissing the Patton Ground Zero witnesses as liars
Am I?
Why can't they be just as mistaken as all the other witnesses the WC dismissed as mistaken?
Oswald wouldn't qualify for TIP help
He might not need it. A good mathematician would be enough.
Too many 'eyes on' at Patton
That's an appeal to majority fallacy
Which only tells me you don't understand the fallacy. People being released from wrongful conviction is factual.
_You sent the video, Chucky. And going 11-for-15 is factual. Add the guy who was AWOL and Benavides. You do the math.
That's an appeal to majority fallacy
_LOL! There you go again!
It's so much fun, beating you up, time after time and still you keep coming back for more.
Which only tells me you don't understand the fallacy. People being released from wrongful conviction is factual.
_You sent the video, Chucky. And going 11-for-15 is factual. Add the guy who was AWOL and Benavides. You do the math.
What video? And how many people "identified" at the police line up? Benavides wasn't even there. No math to do
That's an appeal to majority fallacy
_LOL! There you go again!
It's not my problem that you don't understand what you are being told.
don't understand
Don'tunderstandbelieve
"Ground Zero". LOL.
Tatum, Patterson, and Russell didn't give testimony.
So much fail.
"Ground Zero". LOL.
_Yep. You got that right
Tatum, Patterson, and Russell didn't give testimony.
–Plenty of backups available
Harold Russell
(https://i.postimg.cc/VvTWmjSf/rusell-jfk.png)
Nah.. you haven't got a clue about logical fallacies
Hilarious.
The affividavit doesn't confirm he identified Oswald.... and he wasn't part of the line up witnesses and/or your gang of 15..... er 11
"Ground Zero". LOL.
_Yep. You got that right
But you didn't!
The affividavit doesn't confirm he identified Oswald.... and he wasn't part of the line up witnesses and/or your gang of 15..... er 11
_Take a close look at the 4 Golden dots in the above listing and get a clue that they represent the ones who complete the Gang of 15.
And an affidavit isn't "testimony".
So much fail.
Four people who didn't identify anyone? That's useful. You might as well include the rest of the population of metro Dallas at the time and call it "gang of 1.6 million".
He saw the same guy fumbling the gun as did the guys who ID’d Oswald
> Oswald ID from Russell not needed: It only takes one witness to convict
> Murder weapon not needed to convict: Weapons are easy to get rid of
> Shells not needed to convict. See above.
> Fingerprints not needed to convict. See above.
You don't know who he saw. You don't get to count a guy who didn't identify anybody as an Oswald witness.
Not with an unfair and biased lineup and testimony from an "utter screwball" who said she didn't recognize anybody in the lineup.
You seem to be under the impression that a witness claim is sufficient to convict. Your law skills are even worse than your art skills.
_He saw the same guy fumbling with the gun that the others saw fumbling with the gun and who also ID'd the fumbler as Oswald.
_Before she straightened out what Ball actually meant. Shame on Ball and shame on you lot.
_'There is no common law rule requiring corroboration in order to convict. A judge can reasonably find guilt based soley on the evidence of a single witness'
None of them said anything about fumbling. You lose again.
No judge ever found guilt. You lose again.
What a clownish notion that unreliable testimony from people who witnessed no crime, at lineups or photo showups that were unfair and biased, somehow becomes worthwhile evidence if you do some graphic art about them.
What a clownish notion that unreliable testimony from people who witnessed no crime, at lineups or photo showups that were unfair and biased, somehow becomes worthwhile evidence if you do some graphic art about them.
And you've earned the Clown Seal many times over in this thread alone.
I see you've still got your star witness GUINYARD, who can't tell left from right, on your list!
Not to mention the lying "Davis sisters" -- ROFL
All I said was that preventing your parent from polluting the gene pool would have been a MASSIVE benefit to humanity (and this forum in particular).
I know you have a soft spot for Dr. Goebbels' concept of repeating the same lies over and over and over...
Thumb1:
Wrong reply to post.
>>>Clown Seal Approved<<<
Thumb1:
Nothing to do with 'arzt', moron.
>>> Clown Seal Approved <<<
Thumb1:
Sorry, I don't understand petty little people from the Fatherland, Herr Beck. Kannst du einen 5-jährigen zusammentrommeln und das Kind dazu bringen, eine Grafik für mich zu machen?
Vielen dank und auch vielen dank für Ihren immer nützlichen beitrag.
einen 5-jährigen zusammentrommeln
Could you please explain how it is possible to "bring together" one 5 year old?
Artistic license ;)
The pattern is too obvious, whenever you screw up or get caught lying: "artistic license".
I've no doubt your dumb redneck As I was walking a' alane, I heard twa corbies makin' a mane. The tane untae the tither did say, Whaur sail we gang and dine the day, O. Whaur sail we gang and dine the day? It's in ahint yon auld fail dyke I wot there lies a new slain knight; And naebody kens that he lies there But his hawk and his hound, and his lady fair, O. But his hawk and his hound, and his lady fair. His hound is to the hunting gane His hawk to fetch the wild-fowl hame, His lady ta'en anither mate, So we may mak' our dinner swate, O. So we may mak' our dinner swate. Ye'll sit on his white hause-bane, And I'll pike oot his bonny blue e'en Wi' ae lock o' his gowden hair We'll theek oor nest when it grows bare, O. We'll theek oor nest when it grows bare. There's mony a ane for him maks mane But nane sail ken whaur he is gane O'er his white banes when they are bare The wind sail blaw for evermair, O. The wind sail blaw for evermair.' of a mother bought it every time.
Not so much around here.
You don't have such a license.
You failed again, dummkopf.
At least Dr. Goebbels was successful in his propaganda efforts (until Hitler screwed up) whereas your ridicules effort to copy him is the very definition of failure (by any standard.)
Not even Deputy Oggy bothers to visit -- ROFL
You failed again, dummkopf.
_You made a typo again, dumbkopf
At least Dr. Goebbels was successful in his propaganda efforts (until Hitler screwed up) whereas your ridicules effort to copy him is the very definition of failure (by any standard.)
_Yeah successful in his efforts to trick the unwary high school dropouts into some sort of 'master race' nonsense and convince said dummies that Jews need a permanent 'holiday' where 'Work Will Set You Free'
_Now tell us how you determine the difference between a lie and an opinion
You failed again, dummkopf.
_You made a typo again, dumbkopf
No he didn't. Dummkopf is the correct German spelling.
_Now tell us how you determine the difference between a lie and an opinion
Where you are concerned, there frequently is no difference whatsoever
I believe Oswald did it
How is that a lie
I believe Oswald did it
How is that a lie
It's automatically a lie when what you believe is not true.
Where you are concerned, there frequently is no difference whatsoever
_A comment that puts the lie to your recent 'greetings'
Who get stuck as the liar
You, unless you can prove that your opinion is the right one. Thumb1:
Are you always this confused?
Who did I lie to
Do you ever understand anything
You, unless you can prove that your opinion is the right one. Thumb1:
Again, how it lying to somebody if I believe Oswald did it
How is it lying to someone if you believe he didn't
If you were found to be wrong, then should you be considered a liar
To all those you told about your opinion without proving that your opinion is the right one.
Sure, for instance, I understand perfectly that you forgot the question mark, twice
No one has to prove their opinion
You have not proven yours, for example
To all those you told about your opinion without proving that your opinion is the right one.
_Hint: I know how easy it is to get you goofballs to lose your water
Sure, for instance, I understand perfectly that you forgot the question mark, twice
_More of a statement because I don't really need to question you nerds
To all those you told about your opinion without proving that your opinion is the right one.
_Hint: I know how easy it is to get you goofballs to lose your water
No one has to prove their opinion
And that's where the lie comes into play. Offering an opinion which you can not prove as if it is the truth is the lie.
You have not proven yours, for example
What opinion would that be?
Sure... and if that "explanation" doesn't work you can always claim artistic license.
Btw it's funny to see what goes on in your delusional mind.
What opinion would that be?
_The one you claim you don't have, then promptly flipping and parking your nose firmly up Oswald's arse
It's downright epic watching you lot self destruct!
And that's where the lie comes into play. Offering an opinion which you can not prove as if it is the truth is the lie
_Double tap: This is a discussion forum. This is a forum that allows tasteful spoofs, sarcasm, mockery and a little light-hearted tire-kicking at times. And yes, I do have my arse-kisser suit and brown-noser tie on (re the admin, not you) but only b/c I love saying 'I have my arse-kisser suit and brown noser tie on'
What opinion would that be?
_The one you claim you don't have, then promptly flipping and parking your nose firmly up Oswald's arse
It's downright epic watching you lot self destruct!
There you go again with making assumptions and making up stuff that doesn't exist.
The unlimited blind hatred you guys have for a man who has been dead 58 years is astounding, even more so when you can't even offer any persuasive proof of guilt and have to resort to posting meaningless gifs with your flawed opinions
Proof: Tippit full of bullets gleefully donated by L'll Smirky
The little puke got what he deserved
Booyah
Why do you insist on permanently displaying your ignorance?
Nobody ever connected the bullets taken from Tippit's body with any weapon.
Don't mistake your flawed opinions for actual proof, as the two are worlds apart.
As he says from the far shores of the lunatic fringe
Oswald connected somebody's bullets to Tippit's body, and then had the effrontery (and downright bad manners, if you really must know) by not even asking Tippit how things were going before he himself pulled the trigger on his own patience and somewhat prematurely applied the zombie-snuffing 'double-tap' finisher technique to the noggin.
Get back to me when you are able to write something that makes any sense at all.
Agreed.
Better leave it at that, ...., because you can not have a normal conversation with this one.
Chappy makes extremely weird look normal.
Bill 'The Bawbag' Chapman is losing it.
Keep your perversions to yourself
k bawbag
Low-T days what?
Every day is a low T(esticle) day for the infamous low balls of Bill
Chappy, the "artist" pretending to be a psycho analyst, can't even figure out that he is exposing his own psycho nature on a daily basis. It is so funny to watch how he keeps on trying while getting no traction at all.
lol Bawbag got mad when I first called him bawbag, he scolded me by saying *not sure exactly* because he deleted the comment immediately after typing it. Well, he deleted the comment after I pointed out he just said something homoerotic.
I called him Bawbag Bill as a joke. Not really implying he likes bawbag's, that would be ridiculous + hilarious. But his reply sort of alerted me to maybe Bill does see something electrifying about bawbags. He said I was a 'queer' I think, from memory. And then he typed something like ''keep your sexual fantasies to yourself'' I said: exsqueeze me BillyBawBags. I don't swing that way. At least when I look in the mirror I don't sing to myself ''Swing Low, Sweet Chariot''. No one mentioned bawbags sexually, at this point. So why Billy Low Ball brought sex and ballbags up in the same sentence -- I couldn't tell a judge why he (BillyBawBags) called me a queer and then said ballbags are sexual.
If this goes to court Martin Weidmann, I am giving your screename as a witness. Just saying.
Every day is a low T(esticle) day for the infamous low balls of Bill
lol Bawbag got mad when I first called him bawbag, he scolded me by saying *not sure exactly* because he deleted the comment immediately after typing it. Well, he deleted the comment after I pointed out he just said something homoerotic.
I called him Bawbag Bill as a joke. Not really implying he likes bawbag's, that would be ridiculous + hilarious. But his reply sort of alerted me to maybe Bill does see something electrifying about bawbags. He said I was a 'queer' I think, from memory. And then he typed something like ''keep your sexual fantasies to yourself'' I said: exsqueeze me BillyBawBags. I don't swing that way. At least when I look in the mirror I don't sing to myself ''Swing Low, Sweet Chariot''. No one mentioned bawbags sexually, at this point. So why Billy Low Ball brought sex and ballbags up in the same sentence -- I couldn't tell a judge why he (BillyBawBags) called me a queer and then said ballbags are sexual.
If this goes to court Martin Weidmann, I am giving your screename as a witness. Just saying.
he deleted the comment immediately after typing it.
He does that a lot.
If this goes to court Martin Weidmann, I am giving your screename as a witness. Just saying.
Don't worry about it. It would involve him getting out of his comfort zone (= his basement) and face reality. He will never do it.
Poor Martin: Still incapable of coming up with anything original or even mildly clever
Chappy, the "artist" pretending to be a psycho analyst, can't even figure out that he is exposing his own psycho nature on a daily basis. It is so funny to watch how he keeps on trying while getting no traction at all.
lol Bawbag got mad when I first called him bawbag, he scolded me by saying *not sure exactly* because he deleted the comment immediately after typing it. Well, he deleted the comment after I pointed out he just said something homoerotic.
I called him Bawbag Bill as a joke. Not really implying he likes bawbag's, that would be ridiculous + hilarious. But his reply sort of alerted me to maybe Bill does see something electrifying about bawbags. He said I was a 'queer' I think, from memory. And then he typed something like ''keep your sexual fantasies to yourself'' I said: exsqueeze me BillyBawBags. I don't swing that way. At least when I look in the mirror I don't sing to myself ''Swing Low, Sweet Chariot''. No one mentioned bawbags sexually, at this point. So why Billy Low Ball brought sex and ballbags up in the same sentence -- I couldn't tell a judge why he (BillyBawBags) called me a queer and then said ballbags are sexual.
If this goes to court Martin Weidmann, I am giving your screename as a witness. Just saying.
I invite anyone to point out where I called you a 'queer' (how quaint, btw)
Or the other things you said 'from memory.'
Maybe you lot should attempt to upgrade your vocabulary to that of one who has at least achieved a high school diploma.
I invite anyone to point out where I called you a 'queer' (how quaint, btw)
Or the other things you said 'from memory.'
Maybe you lot should attempt to upgrade your vocabulary to that of one who has at least achieved a high school diploma.
That's the trip, which you obviously missed. You actually (like a coward) called me a queer, insinuating I am gay, but you didn't have the balls to leave your views there. You deleted it.
So you are the empty BawBag.
Maybe you lot should attempt to upgrade your vocabulary to that of one who has at least achieved a high school diploma.
Says the guy who whines constantly about being insulted while begging to be insulted at the same time.
Get over yourself, Chappy, you're no more than a lousy pass time to be tossed aside as soon as something more interesting comes along, which - and this should be no surprise - happens on a daily basis.
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_nextbillchapman_hunter of a brain and a purpose in life...he is nixed.
(https://i.postimg.cc/0QCd02my/176-MARKHAM-2.png)The words of a mentally unbalanced woman....
billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next
(https://i.postimg.cc/G3kVPQDn/YELLOW.png)
It's pretty amazing this garbage thread has received 19,000 views on this forum. Jeez. It looks like it was made by someone with an awful amount of time on their hands.
I'm blocking Jerry Freeman permanently for suggesting porn.
He is generally a nasty piece of work.
He just posted on my 'Dead Oswald Tour' thread
Mike Walton is no catch either, but for some reason I was unable to get him on my 'block' list
UPDATE:
FIXED re Walton
I'm blocking Jerry Freeman permanently for suggesting porn.Now where did I do that?
So now it looks like someone has hurt your feelings, Billy? I mean you seem to be going to extremes on here. You post nothing but mocking, silly illustrations and statements and when others tease you a little bit, you want to block them?
The larger question is why are you really here? It seems like you don't want to learn anything here. There are plenty of other forums out there where you can post comedic illustrations and such.
I'm blocking Jerry Freeman permanently for suggesting porn.
He is generally a nasty piece of work.
He just posted on my 'Dead Oswald Tour' thread
Mike Walton is no catch either, but for some reason I was unable to get him on my 'block' list
UPDATE:
FIXED re Walton