JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 05:34:17 PM

Title: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 05:34:17 PM
I reply: Check out the video “JFK – The Smoking Gun” by Colin McLaren. In it he describes how Howard Donahue, a ballistic expert, determined that the shot came accidentally from Hickey.  The smoke from the gun carried back over the motorcade and many people in the following cars smelled gun smoke. The book "Mortal Error" by Bonar Menninger outlines Donahue's investigative work.
McLaren: “Ten witnesses smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting”. The wind was 16 mph from the south west. The wind was blowing at 15 mph towards the TSBD.  This wind direction would have carried gun smoke from the grassy knoll towards the TSBD also, away from the motorcade. If I understand this correctly, the wind would have been going directly at and in line with the motorcade from the front.
McLaren mentioned that Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents.
I believe that any cover up by the feds wasn’t to shield the assassins; it was to cover up what Hickey had done.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on August 28, 2019, 06:04:31 PM
I reply: Check out the video “JFK – The Smoking Gun” by Colin McLaren. In it he describes how Howard Donahue, a ballistic expert, determined that the shot came accidentally from Hickey.  The smoke from the gun carried back over the motorcade and many people in the following cars smelled gun smoke. The book "Mortal Error" by Bonar Menninger outlines Donahue's investigative work.
McLaren: “Ten witnesses smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting”. The wind was 16 mph from the south west. The wind was blowing at 15 mph towards the TSBD.  This wind direction would have carried gun smoke from the grassy knoll towards the TSBD also, away from the motorcade. If I understand this correctly, the wind would have been going directly at and in line with the motorcade from the front.
McLaren mentioned that Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents.
I believe that any cover up by the feds wasn’t to shield the assassins; it was to cover up what Hickey had done.

According to a car dude online, gasoline can smell like gunpowder at times, adding that the heavy limo could have produced the smell by being suddenly gunned into a higher speed. I didn't pursue that because I couldn't find anything else online supporting that notion.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 06:35:47 PM
I don’t disagree with car dude but what I found is a car can smell like rotten eggs or gunpowder if it is running too rich. The problem with that scenario is that they only smelled it after the shots were fired. If the car was running too rich it would have smelled of gunpowder from the git go and they didn’t. Also several people in the motorcade were very familiar with the smell of gunpowder and swore that they smelled gunpowder.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Denis Pointing on August 28, 2019, 06:50:46 PM
I reply: Check out the video “JFK – The Smoking Gun” by Colin McLaren. In it he describes how Howard Donahue, a ballistic expert, determined that the shot came accidentally from Hickey.  The smoke from the gun carried back over the motorcade and many people in the following cars smelled gun smoke. The book "Mortal Error" by Bonar Menninger outlines Donahue's investigative work.
McLaren: “Ten witnesses smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting”. The wind was 16 mph from the south west. The wind was blowing at 15 mph towards the TSBD.  This wind direction would have carried gun smoke from the grassy knoll towards the TSBD also, away from the motorcade. If I understand this correctly, the wind would have been going directly at and in line with the motorcade from the front.
McLaren mentioned that Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents.
I believe that any cover up by the feds wasn’t to shield the assassins; it was to cover up what Hickey had done.

You just posted in another thread that the mob did it!! Make up your mind for **** sake.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 07:07:59 PM
The mob did not fire the fatal head shot. The mob did the assassination of JFK, planned, organized, executed, etc,  but they did not fire the fatal round.
In the excitement, Hickey accidently squeezed off a round. I have read that he was standing up on the rear seat which would create an unstable situation. Now imagine him with the AR15 in his hand, the car accelerates or decelerates and he loses his balance. In that situation anyone would try to grab onto something. He grabbed the pistol grip thus squeezing off the fatal round.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on August 28, 2019, 07:40:09 PM
I don’t disagree with car dude but what I found is a car can smell like rotten eggs or gunpowder if it is running too rich. The problem with that scenario is that they only smelled it after the shots were fired. If the car was running too rich it would have smelled of gunpowder from the git go and they didn’t. Also several people in the motorcade were very familiar with the smell of gunpowder and swore that they smelled gunpowder.

Are you talking about people near the limo? If gasoline can smell like gunpowder then all bets are off, especially given the fact that emotions can enter the picture given the gunfire and shock.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Denis Pointing on August 28, 2019, 08:07:25 PM
Are you talking about people near the limo? If gasoline can smell like gunpowder then all bets are off, especially given the fact that emotions can enter the picture given the gunfire and shock.

Hey Bill, aren't we jumping the gun a bit here? Shouldn't we first be asking who exactly these "Ten witnesses (who) smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting” actually are? Where are their statements and testimonies? Do Mike Carney's cited authors supply any actual proof these 'witnesses' even exist?
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on August 28, 2019, 08:08:58 PM
The mob did not fire the fatal head shot. The mob did the assassination of JFK, planned, organized, executed, etc,  but they did not fire the fatal round.
In the excitement, Hickey accidently squeezed off a round. I have read that he was standing up on the rear seat which would create an unstable situation. Now imagine him with the AR15 in his hand, the car accelerates or decelerates and he loses his balance. In that situation anyone would try to grab onto something. He grabbed the pistol grip thus squeezing off the fatal round.
Closeups of frames from the Charles Bronson film that were taken at the time of the fatal head shot apparently shows Hickey seated in the SS car/Queen Mary. Or at least with no rifle in his hands. It's not entirely clear (to me) that that's Hickey; I assume it's him (who else could it be?) since he was seated in the back left. However, it does show, again to me, pretty clearly no one in the back of the car with a raised rifle at the time of the head shot.

The below are from Dale Myers' site. The story/details can be found here: http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2013/08/drums-of-conspiracy.html

(http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/images/news/bronson_254_083013.jpg)
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Royell Storing on August 28, 2019, 08:12:43 PM
The mob did not fire the fatal head shot. The mob did the assassination of JFK, planned, organized, executed, etc,  but they did not fire the fatal round.
In the excitement, Hickey accidently squeezed off a round. I have read that he was standing up on the rear seat which would create an unstable situation. Now imagine him with the AR15 in his hand, the car accelerates or decelerates and he loses his balance. In that situation anyone would try to grab onto something. He grabbed the pistol grip thus squeezing off the fatal round.

   If you look at images of the Queen Mary coming down Houston St and then Elm St, SA Hickey is seated Much Higher than everyone else inside that car. In fact, the level of his Head is Higher than the Top of the windshield. Nobody has ever explained Exactly why Hickey was seated at that highly elevated level.
   SA Hickey was usually one of the "Detail" Guys that washed, waxed, and generally cleaned up the Limos before and after they were used in official functions.  Hickey's SS field experience was more in line with Manny, Moe, & Jack vs an SS agent such as Clint Hill. Putting a "locked and loaded" AR-15 in the hands of an inexperienced individual such as Hickey amidst his being under fire = rolling the dice as to what you are going to get.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Denis Pointing on August 28, 2019, 09:00:22 PM
"Shooting holes in theory that a Secret Service agent killed President Kennedy"   

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/Shooting_holes_in_theory_that_a_Secret_Service_agent_killed_President_Kennedy.html
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 09:04:39 PM
Hey Denis, Much of the information about that I am referring to comes from the video "JFK - The Smoking Gun" by Colin McLaren. It talks about Hickey, the people that saw him with a gun, and the people that smelled the gunpowder. It's about an hour and a half long and I think you can see it for $2-$3 on youtube, here's the trailer
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: John Iacoletti on August 28, 2019, 09:04:59 PM
"Shooting holes in theory that a Secret Service agent killed President Kennedy"   

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/Shooting_holes_in_theory_that_a_Secret_Service_agent_killed_President_Kennedy.html

From the article:

"Add in disagreements about how much JFK's head was leaning forward or turned toward the left, as seen below in a frame from the Zapruder film, and the trajectory further resembles guesswork."

Aren't they all?
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 28, 2019, 10:09:54 PM
Closeups of frames from the Charles Bronson film that were taken at the time of the fatal head shot apparently shows Hickey seated in the SS car/Queen Mary. Or at least with no rifle in his hands. It's not entirely clear (to me) that that's Hickey; I assume it's him (who else could it be?) since he was seated in the back left. However, it does show, again to me, pretty clearly no one in the back of the car with a raised rifle at the time of the head shot.

The below are from Dale Myers' site. The story/details can be found here: http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2013/08/drums-of-conspiracy.html (http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2013/08/drums-of-conspiracy.html)

(http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/images/news/bronson_254_083013.jpg)

(https://sites.google.com/site/jfkforum/zfilm/firstshot/willis-bretzner-labelled.jpg)

Wonder how Myers knows Hickey, rather than Bennett, is the lower of the two in the backseat. Myers believes Hickey is seated:

    "We wonder if ReelZ will show the amateur film of the assassination
     made by Charles Bronson, which shows Hickey seated at the moment
     of the fatal head shot?"

(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/ALTGENSZ.jpg)

The Altgens photo, taken about three seconds before, would seem to favor Bennett as the person lower and forward of the elevated figure in Bronson. Bennett seems to me to be lower in Altgens than in Betzner/Willis; compare the level of Bennett's head relative to the level of Powers' head or the sun visor. Hickey therefore didn't change his elevation during the three seconds that followed, but did turn his head forward.

Which means Hickey, during the head shot, hasn't yet begun to reach to retrieve the rifle. Hickey starting to retrieve the gun after the last shot is consistent with what Hickey said. No other agent said he had the rifle before the last shot.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 28, 2019, 10:11:03 PM
Responding to the article https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/Shooting_holes_in_theory_that_a_Secret_Service_agent_killed_President_Kennedy.html
 Accidents don’t get any freakier – The bullet had to go somewhere, he wasn’t aiming, he just accidently squeezed off a round.
No solid witnesses - Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents.
Smoking Gun discredits grassy knoll – Yes because of the physics of the fatal shot. It hit JFK in the back of the passed through his brain and then exploded blowing out the right side of his forehead.  In the Zapruder film it shows blood and brain matter being blasted out of his head. That was not an entry wound. An entry wound would be slightly larger that the bullet’s diameter.
No one was sure Hickey’s fired the gun – One SS Agent said he thought that Hickey fired the gun.
Lawsuit – yes there was a lawsuit but we don’t know the particulars about it. Menninger went to Hickey’s house to confront him and Hickey didn’t even deny it. I think he said nothing and slammed the door in Menninger’s face if I remember correctly. Kind of peculiar behavior for an innocent man.
It’s dubious using a gapping hole to calculate trajectory – I don’t know that’s it’s dubious but the exit hole would have been somewhere within the gapping hole. Personally I would have used the center of the gapping hole.
Did the bullet enter near the base or 4 inches higher – The illustration shows the bullet entering JFK’s head just right of center about 2/3’s of the way up that back of his head. He deliberately tries to confuse the issue.
The frame of JFK in the limo shows him clutching his neck meaning that was his reaction to the second shot from the TSBD, not the third and fatal shot.
Any bullet fired at a cantaloupe or a watermelon is going to leave a nice round entry hole because of the soft material and the exit wound might be small and round in the case of a jacketed bullet and explosive if it’s a frangible bullet.
The pictures of the carcano bullets look like copper jacketed bullets. I believe the bullet’s fired from the 6th floor of the TSBD were steel jacketed bullets. Copper is way softer than steel.
All the points that the author brings up appear to be twisted. There is another critic that brought up a lot of points also and neglects to mention that there were actual witnesses. I believe McLaren emailed him and gave him an earful.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 29, 2019, 12:32:45 AM
Responding to the article https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/Shooting_holes_in_theory_that_a_Secret_Service_agent_killed_President_Kennedy.html (https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/Shooting_holes_in_theory_that_a_Secret_Service_agent_killed_President_Kennedy.html)
 Accidents don’t get any freakier – The bullet had to go somewhere, he wasn’t aiming, he just accidently squeezed off a round.
No solid witnesses - Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents.

LOL! "in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot." Get real.

Quote
Smoking Gun discredits grassy knoll – Yes because of the physics of the fatal shot. It hit JFK in the back of the passed through his brain and then exploded blowing out the right side of his forehead.  In the Zapruder film it shows blood and brain matter being blasted out of his head. That was not an entry wound. An entry wound would be slightly larger that the bullet’s diameter.
No one was sure Hickey’s fired the gun – One SS Agent said he thought that Hickey fired the gun.
Lawsuit – yes there was a lawsuit but we don’t know the particulars about it. Menninger went to Hickey’s house to confront him and Hickey didn’t even deny it. I think he said nothing and slammed the door in Menninger’s face if I remember correctly. Kind of peculiar behavior for an innocent man.

Perfectly appropriate for an innocent man whose reputation is being assailed.

Quote
It’s dubious using a gapping hole to calculate trajectory – I don’t know that’s it’s dubious but the exit hole would have been somewhere within the gapping hole. Personally I would have used the center of the gapping hole.
Did the bullet enter near the base or 4 inches higher – The illustration shows the bullet entering JFK’s head just right of center about 2/3’s of the way up that back of his head. He deliberately tries to confuse the issue.
The frame of JFK in the limo shows him clutching his neck meaning that was his reaction to the second shot from the TSBD, not the third and fatal shot.
Any bullet fired at a cantaloupe or a watermelon is going to leave a nice round entry hole because of the soft material and the exit wound might be small and round in the case of a jacketed bullet and explosive if it’s a frangible bullet.

Problem with the melon tests is that neither Donahue nor McLaren used a surrogate for the hard tissue of the skull. Of course the FMJs aren't going to disintegrate striking the melon "head" when it's basically a ball of soft tissue. I'm surprised that McLaren's brand didn't suffer for such a serious forensic testing oversight.

Quote
The pictures of the carcano bullets look like copper jacketed bullets. I believe the bullet’s fired from the 6th floor of the TSBD were steel jacketed bullets. Copper is way softer than steel.
All the points that the author brings up appear to be twisted. There is another critic that brought up a lot of points also and neglects to mention that there were actual witnesses. I believe McLaren emailed him and gave him an earful.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Royell Storing on August 29, 2019, 12:53:15 AM

    Let's Not Forget: (1) SA Hickey's seated position is Higher than the Top of the Queen Mary Windshield, and (2) The JFK Limo and the Queen Mary are Traveling/Facing DOWN HILL. SA Hickey did Not need to Stand Up in order for an alleged shot fired from the AR-15 to clear the top of the Queen Mary windshield and reach the JFK Limo.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 29, 2019, 02:36:55 AM
 LOL! “In agent Hickey’s had at the time of the of the third shot.” Get real
Hey, I didn’t say it, the eleven witnesses did, were you there??
 
Perfectly appropriate for an innocent man to say, really??? How about asking what he is talking about??
Problem with melon tests………..
I am sorry but do disintegrate when they hit a melon, want to see pictures?

Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 29, 2019, 03:23:42 AM
LOL! “In agent Hickey’s had at the time of the of the third shot.” Get real
Hey, I didn’t say it, the eleven witnesses did, were you there??

I have the book "Mortal Error". No where in it is there anything like:

    "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot"

Quote
Perfectly appropriate for an innocent man to say, really??? How about asking what he is talking about??

Some things are so ridiculous they don't dignify a serious response.

Quote
Problem with melon tests………..
I am sorry but do disintegrate when they hit a melon, want to see pictures?

FMJs disintegrate when striking a melon? Love to see that.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 29, 2019, 09:16:40 AM
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 29, 2019, 09:30:01 AM
McLaren: “Ten witnesses smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting”. The wind was 16 mph from the south west. The wind was blowing at 15 mph towards the TSBD. Patrolman Brown was standing above the motorcade on the overpass when he smelled gun smoke, wind was coming from behind him. Senator Yarbrough, riding in the car behind the Secret Service car, Ralph W. Yarbrough, was a war veteran and was very familiar with the smell of gun smoke. By days end, Deckers men pulled in several dozen witnesses. Hugh Betner saw one Secret Service agent pull out a gun, he was standing watching the motorcade. Senator Yarbrough also saw a rifle. Dallas Mayor see’s one Secret Service agent standup with a sub-machine gun. Secret Service agent Winston Lawson testified he saw a fellow agent holding a rifle, an automatic weapon and the first thing that went through his head is that he had fired it.
Agent Hickey was holding the AR 15. Agent Winston rides in the front of JFK in the lead car. He noticed Agent Hickey standing up in the follow up car, “I first thought that he had fired it”.

"Howard Donahue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents". No mention of Mennengers book, I don't know. I have McLarens book on order, I will see what it says.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 29, 2019, 11:12:40 AM
Please watch the video "JFK - The Smoking Gun" by Colin McLaren. It's an hour and 20 min long and it will explain about all the witnesses that say George with the gun and also the 10 people that smelled gun smoke after the firing started, not before.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 29, 2019, 04:58:11 PM
McLaren: “Ten witnesses smelled gun smoke at street level at the time of the shooting”. The wind was 16 mph from the south west. The wind was blowing at 15 mph towards the TSBD. Patrolman Brown was standing above the motorcade on the overpass when he smelled gun smoke, wind was coming from behind him. Senator Yarbrough, riding in the car behind the Secret Service car, Ralph W. Yarbrough, was a war veteran and was very familiar with the smell of gun smoke. By days end, Deckers men pulled in several dozen witnesses. Hugh Betner saw one Secret Service agent pull out a gun, he was standing watching the motorcade.

Betzner doesn't say when relative to the last shot that he saw the rifle.

Quote
Senator Yarbrough also saw a rifle.

Yarborough, in his affidavit, said he saw the rifle after the fatal shot:

    "After the shooting, one of the secret service men sitting down in the car in
     front of us pulled out an automatic rifle or weapon and looked backward."

Quote
Dallas Mayor see’s one Secret Service agent standup with a sub-machine gun.

His testimony seems to place the rifle sighting after Clint Hill ran to the limousine:

    "The Secret Service men ran to that car. From out of nowhere appeared
     one Secret Service man with a submachine gun."

Quote

Secret Service agent Winston Lawson testified he saw a fellow agent holding a rifle, an automatic weapon and the first thing that went through his head is that he had fired it.

    "I noticed Agent Hickey standing up in the follow-up car with the automatic
     weapon and first thought he had fired at someone."
          (Statement Dec. 1, 1963)

    "Then the second and third shots, reports, I noticed the President's car back
     there, but I also noticed right after the reports an agent standing up with an
     automatic weapon in his hand, and the first thing that flashed through my mind,
     this was the only weapon I had seen, was that he had fired because this was
     the only weapon I had seen up to that time."
          (WC Testimony)

Lawson did not see the Colt AR-15 "“in agent Hickey’s had at the time of the of the third shot."

Quote

Agent Hickey was holding the AR 15. Agent Winston rides in the front of JFK in the lead car. He noticed Agent Hickey standing up in the follow up car, “I first thought that he had fired it”.

In his statement, Lawson places his Hickey sighting after the shooting:

    "As the lead car was passing under this bridge I heard the first loud, sharp report
     and in more rapid succession two more sounds like gunfire. I could see persons
     to the left of the motorcade vehicles running away. I noticed Agent Hickey standing
     up in the follow-up car with the automatic weapon and first thought he had fired at
     someone. Both the President's car and our lead car rapidly accelerated almost
     simultaneously."

Quote

"Howard Donahue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents". No mention of Mennengers book, I don't know. I have McLarens book on order, I will see what it says.

    "Nine witnesses--including Hickey himself--had put the gun in Hickey's hands
     just after the last shot. More important, two of the witnesses had put the
     gun in Hickey's hands the instant the shot was fired. And one had seen the
     agent stand up and fall over about the time the shot hit home."
          -- Mortal Error, p.105 (St. Martin's Press, 1992)

The "two witnesses" referred to in the book clipping are Sam Holland and supposedly Glen Bennett. Donahue's parsing of Holland's account is the basis for Hickey having been seen to "stand up and fall over about the time the shot hit home." I think Donahue is a lot more honest than McLaren.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on August 29, 2019, 06:48:41 PM
A couple of years ago I slo-mo'd the Dix (or Bronson?) vid which revealed a guy in the back falling backwards with what appears to be a long thin object. Some showings chop that part off

I'll try to find that in my files
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 29, 2019, 08:19:43 PM
So there are a lot of people seeing the AR15 in Hickey’s hand, some thinking he fired it. No other weapons were seen by any of the witnesses. Other people, reputable people smelling gun smoke. The smoke flowed down the motorcade, common sense say’s he fired the gun.
It’s possible that the frangible round could have come from the Dal Tex Building or somewhere else behind JFK but then you have a problem with the gun smoke, it isn’t going to reach the motorcade because the wind is blowing in that direction.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 29, 2019, 09:54:24 PM
So there are a lot of people seeing the AR15 in Hickey’s hand, some thinking he fired it.

Is that your new take on this claim?

    "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."

OK. We got through to you.

Quote
No other weapons were seen by any of the witnesses. Other people, reputable people smelling gun smoke. The smoke flowed down the motorcade, common sense say’s he fired the gun.

What's wrong with two heavy stretch-limos causing exhaust fumes that could be confused with the smell of gun smoke? No where else in the motorcade do they (and the motorcycle escorts) have such sudden all-out acceleration as they do after the last shot.

Quote
It’s possible that the frangible round could have come from the Dal Tex Building or somewhere else behind JFK but then you have a problem with the gun smoke, it isn’t going to reach the motorcade because the wind is blowing in that direction.

Why the Dal-Tex? Because it's low to the street like Hickey's position? And that better conforms with the Donahue/McLaren trajectory through the head?

(https://sites.google.com/site/jfkforum/headwound/z312-wcr-slope-brain-skull.jpg)

A lower trajectory slope would exit more up towards the apex, and thus cause a smaller gaping exit wound.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: John Iacoletti on August 30, 2019, 02:11:17 AM
A couple of years ago I slo-mo'd the Dix (or Bronson?) vid

Dix?
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: John Iacoletti on August 30, 2019, 02:14:37 AM
(https://sites.google.com/site/jfkforum/headwound/z312-wcr-slope-brain-skull.jpg)

“Oswald window”  :D
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 05:01:56 PM
I don’t understand what you, JO, mean by “Ok, we got through to you”

Witnesses to Hickey holding and possibly firing a “rifle”:
•   Dallas Mayor, Earl Cabel. see’s one Secret Service agent standup with a sub-machine gun.
•   Senator Yarbrough also saw a rifle.
•   Agent Winston rides in the front of JFK in the lead car. He noticed Agent Hickey standing up in the follow up car, “I first thought that    he had fired it”.
•   Sam Holland, a witness, is standing on top of the underpass as the motorcade is going under him. “After the first shot, the Secret Service agent raised up with a machine gun and dropped back down into the seat. WC Vol XIX, ex 5323, pg 480
•   Roy Kellerman testified there was an AR15 in the motorcade.
•   Hugh Betner saw one Secret Service agent pull out a gun, he was standing watching the motorcade. vol XXIV, ex 2003, pg 200
•   A police officer on the over pass as the motorcade passing under saw an agent swinging around the gun.
•   Margaret Chisolm WC vol XIX, ex 5323, pg 472 saw agents stand up and sit back down.
•   Jean Hill – Saw JFK grab his chest and fall forward and she thinks she saw men in plain clothes shooting back. WC Vol XXIV, Ex 2003, pg 212
•   Ralph Yarborough saw a SS Agent pull out a rifle. WC Vol VII, pg 439
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 05:31:14 PM
“What's wrong with two heavy stretch-limos causing exhaust fumes that could be confused with the smell of gun smoke? No where else in the motorcade do they (and the motorcycle escorts) have such sudden all-out acceleration as they do after the last shot.”

JO, the problem with that is no one mentions “exhaust” fumes, they say “gunpowder”. Basic gunpowder is composed of charcoal, potassium nitrate, and sulfur which has a particular smell that to me smells nothing like exhaust fumes. So I am not buying car exhaust.

Witnesses to smelling gunpowder at street level:
•   Ralph Yarborough was in the car two cars behind the Presidents car and said he smelled gunpowder. He is a war veteran with more than 50 years experience with fire arms. WC Vol VII, pg 439
•   Earl Brown, Dallas Police Patrolman – “Heard shot’s and then smelled gunpowder” WC Vol VI, pg 233
•   Elizabeth Cabell, wife of Dallas mayor, said “acutely aware of the smell of gunpowder”  WC Vol VII, pg 486
•   Billy J. Martin, patrolman - “You could smell the gunpowder… you knew he wasn’t far away. When you’re that close, you can smell the powder burning. Why you—you’ve got to be pretty close to them… you could smell the gunpowder… right there in the street.”
•   Congressman Ray Roberts, seated next to her, had mentioned it also. Same source as Martin
•   Tom C. Dillard, two cars behind the Cabell car, he “. . . very definitely smelled gunpowder when the cars moved up to the corner [of Elm and Houston Streets] Same source as Martin
•   Virgie Rackley stood in front of the depository building close to the street. “She recalled that after the second shot, she smelled gun smoke…” same source as Martin
•   One newspaper summed it up: “. . . seconds later the cavalcade was gone. The area still reeked with the smell of gunpowder.” Same source as Martin
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 06:07:25 PM
JO, yes, the Dal Tex building because of the angles are similar. It came to mind because there have been witnesses that claimed they saw a shooter or heard a shot(s) come from that direction. I have also read that they, Marcello’s group, put a shooter in there. But again, no one would have smelled gunpowder with the wind direction.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 06:21:47 PM
A lower trajectory slope would exit more up towards the apex, and thus cause a smaller gaping exit wound.

 JO, I don’t know much about the physics of what a frangible round does except explode once it hits something and from everything I have seen it usually gets inside what it hit and explodes. I think the exit explosions result would depend on things like thickness of the skull in the vicinity of the explosion.   I leave those kinds of things up to the experts like Howard Donahue and Colin McLaren.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 30, 2019, 09:01:13 PM
I don’t understand what you, JO, mean by “Ok, we got through to you”

You went from claiming (or agreeing with):

   "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."

to ....

    "So there are a lot of people seeing the AR15 in Hickey’s hand, some thinking he fired it."

Unless you think both claims amount to the same thing.

Quote
Witnesses to Hickey holding and possibly firing a “rifle”:
•   Dallas Mayor, Earl Cabel. see’s one Secret Service agent standup with a sub-machine gun.
•   Senator Yarbrough also saw a rifle.
•   Agent Winston rides in the front of JFK in the lead car. He noticed Agent Hickey standing up in the follow up car, “I first thought that    he had fired it”.

Those three we established only saw Hickey with the rifle AFTER the fatal shot. Lawson (Winston) based his thought that Hickey had fired his gun on a thought he had, not from actually witnessing it:

    "the first thing that flashed through my mind, this was the only weapon I had seen,
     was that he had fired because this was the only weapon I had seen up to that time."

Quote
•   Sam Holland, a witness, is standing on top of the underpass as the motorcade is going under him. “After the first shot, the Secret Service agent raised up with a machine gun and dropped back down into the seat. WC Vol XIX, ex 5323, pg 480

Interesting that attention is not given to the part in the same affidavit where Holland pins the "first shot" to the head shot:

    "After the first shot the President slumped over and Mrs. Kennedy jumped up and
     tried to get over in the back seat to him."

Now that's perfectly consistent with when Hickey raised up the rifle, that is, AFTER the head shot. Holland or the transcriber got something mixed up when they associate the "first shot" with the head hsot.

Quote
•   Roy Kellerman testified there was an AR15 in the motorcade.
•   Hugh Betner saw one Secret Service agent pull out a gun, he was standing watching the motorcade. vol XXIV, ex 2003, pg 200
•   A police officer on the over pass as the motorcade passing under saw an agent swinging around the gun.
•   Margaret Chisolm WC vol XIX, ex 5323, pg 472 saw agents stand up and sit back down.
•   Jean Hill – Saw JFK grab his chest and fall forward and she thinks she saw men in plain clothes shooting back. WC Vol XXIV, Ex 2003, pg 212
•   Ralph Yarborough saw a SS Agent pull out a rifle. WC Vol VII, pg 439


That's nice. But you have to establish whether they actually saw Hickey with the rifle in his hands at the moment of the fatal shot.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 30, 2019, 09:37:56 PM
A lower trajectory slope would exit more up towards the apex, and thus cause a smaller gaping exit wound.

 JO, I don’t know much about the physics of what a frangible round does except explode once it hits something and from everything I have seen it usually gets inside what it hit and explodes. I think the exit explosions result would depend on things like thickness of the skull in the vicinity of the explosion.

But the type of ammunition used by Oswald will disintegrate when it strikes hard tissue (ie: the skull bone) (see: "Wound Ballistics Of 6.5-mm. Mannlicher-Carcano Ammunition" Link (http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62296) ).  The Carcano bullet was designed to stay intact for soft tissue transit only. The AR-15 rounds are different; they're designed to disintegrate when they strike either soft and hard tissue.

About 24 minutes into "JFK - The Smoking Gun", McLaren presents a melon being shot through with a Carcano bullet.

    "Darling, I think we're seeing a typical full-metal jacket right through drills
     a hole clean as a whistle."

However the use of a melon is not the ballistic equivalent of a human skull; it's equal to soft tissue. So all McLaren's melon demonstration proved was that a Carcano bullet will go smoothly through soft tissue. The problem is that McLaren claims the melon test proves that a Carcano bullet is inconsistent with the bullet that struck Kennedy's head because the bullet failed to disintegrate (but how could it disintegrate if all it's going through is a soft tissue stimulant?).

Quote
I leave those kinds of things up to the experts like Howard Donahue and Colin McLaren.

They are clearer thinking with regards to the Single-Bullet Theory being possible.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 10:01:04 PM
 8-10 people say they saw a rifle/machine gun/AR15 in an agents hand, the only agent with a gun out was Hickey. 10-12 people smelled gunpowder which had  to have come from the front of the motorcade.  The fatal bullet came from Hickey’s direction. Deductive logic tells you Hickey fired the fatal shot.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 30, 2019, 11:28:19 PM
8-10 people say they saw a rifle/machine gun/AR15 in an agents hand, the only agent with a gun out was Hickey.

Hickey himself said he retrieved the Colt AR-15 but only AFTER the head shot. The Bronson film shows no rifle deployed in the follow-up car. I believe Hickey is the elevated figure near the back seat, and he has yet to lower himself to get the rifle.

(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/normal_Willis5Large.jpg)
Willis-05 - Z202 (6 sec before head shot)
Hickey not lowering to get rifle here
 
(https://sites.google.com/site/lightboxzframes/lostbullet/z200-z249/z213.jpg)
Zapruder frame 213 (5.5 sec before head shot)
Hickey not lowering to get rifle here
 
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/normal_AP6311220989originalhalfsizecrop.jpg)
Altgens-06 - Z255 (3.2 sec before head shot)
Hickey not lowering to get rifle here

Quote
10-12 people smelled gunpowder which had  to have come from the front of the motorcade. 

They would smell just as well vehicle exhaust from the full-on acceleration of two heavy stretch-limos.

Quote
The fatal bullet came from Hickey’s direction.

The trajectory is much more consistent with a bullet from the Oswald window.

Quote
Deductive logic tells you Hickey fired the fatal shot.

Deductive logic ought to work with the evidence.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 30, 2019, 11:56:46 PM
Hickey himself said he retrieved the Colt AR-15 but only AFTER the head shot. The Bronson film shows no rifle deployed in the follow-up car. I believe Hickey is the elevated figure near the back seat, and he has yet to lower himself to get the rifle.
Z213 is about the time the second shot is fired, the magic bullet.  So he has 6-9 seconds to retrieve the gun, stand up and fire. That’s doable.
 They would smell just as well vehicle exhaust from the full-on acceleration of two heavy stretch-limos.
Two different smelling compounds in my eyes. I know gunpowder when I smell it, I used to make the stuff and light it up.
The trajectory is much more consistent with a bullet from the Oswald window.
Not according to Howard Donahue who was a ballistics expert.
Deductive logic ought to work with the evidence.
It does.
Have you seen the video JFK – The Smoking Gun?
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Royell Storing on August 31, 2019, 02:57:54 AM
You went from claiming (or agreeing with):

   "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."

to ....

    "So there are a lot of people seeing the AR15 in Hickey’s hand, some thinking he fired it."

Unless you think both claims amount to the same thing.

Those three we established only saw Hickey with the rifle AFTER the fatal shot. Lawson (Winston) based his thought that Hickey had fired his gun on a thought he had, not from actually witnessing it:

    "the first thing that flashed through my mind, this was the only weapon I had seen,
     was that he had fired because this was the only weapon I had seen up to that time."

Interesting that attention is not given to the part in the same affidavit where Holland pins the "first shot" to the head shot:

    "After the first shot the President slumped over and Mrs. Kennedy jumped up and
     tried to get over in the back seat to him."

Now that's perfectly consistent with when Hickey raised up the rifle, that is, AFTER the head shot. Holland or the transcriber got something mixed up when they associate the "first shot" with the head hsot.


That's nice. But you have to establish whether they actually saw Hickey with the rifle in his hands at the moment of the fatal shot.

       Lawson testified that, ".......I also noticed RIGHT AFTER the reports an agent STANDING UP with an automatic weapon in his hand....". He did Not say he saw an Agent rising or getting up inside the Queen Mary. In order for anyone to see Hickey with, "the rifle in his hands at the Moment of the fatal shot", that person would have to be looking Directly at the Queen Mary when the Kill Shot was fired. If you know of Any Eyewitness that did this please provide that information.     
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 31, 2019, 03:32:24 AM
       Lawson testified that, ".......I also noticed RIGHT AFTER the reports an agent STANDING UP with an automatic weapon in his hand....". He did Not say he saw an Agent rising or getting up inside the Queen Mary. 

Like to know what you think "right after" means. Instantly? One second? Four or five seconds?

Quote
In order for anyone to see Hickey with, "the rifle in his hands at the Moment of the fatal shot", that person would have to be looking Directly at the Queen Mary when the Kill Shot was fired.

Well, if you could find someone who noticed Hickey go to the floor (which is where you have the AR-15) in the 5.5 sec between Z213 (the last Z-frame his head is in) and Z313, that would be a start. But remember, during the 2.3 sec between Z213 and Z255 (the Altgens photo), Hickey has to go to the floor, grab the rifle, pop back up and turn his head towards the rear.

If not then, Hickey has to do the same (except instead of turning his head backward, he'll be turning it forward) in the 3.2 sec between the Altgens photo and the head shot. And he has turn off the safety, stand up and lose his balance.

(https://cssanimation.rocks/images/posts/clocks/twelve.gif)

Quote
If you know of Any Eyewitness that did this please provide that information.

I know of absolutely none. But by Mike Carney's count, there are eleven:

    "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: John Mytton on August 31, 2019, 05:46:23 AM
So he has 6-9 seconds to retrieve the gun, stand up and fire. That’s doable.

So they're driving down Elm street and in full view of everyone and cameras, Hickey reaches down and grabs his Colt AR-15 then stands up, aims and shoots Kennedy in the head? You have got to be kidding? I'm still laughing that's seriously nuts!

It's not easy to hide a Colt AR-15.

(http://thejournalofanomalousscience.com/graphics/documentaries/Hinkley_w-Rifle.png)

Btw most CTs believe that shooting a man in a moving car was impossible, so is a man in a moving car shooting another man in a moving car impossible squared?

JohnM



Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: John Iacoletti on August 31, 2019, 06:52:12 AM
But the type of ammunition used by Oswald will disintegrate when it strikes hard tissue (ie: the skull bone)

“used by Oswald”. LOL.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 02:17:54 PM
If you were looking a Hickey when the fatal shot was fired then you would not see JFK’s brains flying out of his head. If you were watching JFK and see the pink flash you would not see Hickey holding the gun. If you were looking at the gun you would not see a muzzle blast because of the AR15’s flash suppressor.  It would be difficult for anyone to be at that correct angle looking at JFK and Hickey at the same time. If you were right beside the limos you would be looking at one or the other, you can’t see both at the same time unless you are a fair distance away. Look at the Zapruder film, it didn’t show both.
You doubt my theory I am representing here but you don’t come up with your own solutions. Tell me how you have a dozen witnesses saying a SS Agent was holding a gun, JFK gets shot in the head from the rear, and a dozen people smell gunpowder, not car fumes? Tell me how that happens. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 02:54:24 PM
 A jacketed bullet is not designed to disintegrate upon impact. The purpose of the jacket is to keep it together and hopefully go though more than one soldier in combat. I have personally fired jacketed bullets at 2x6 piece of wood and it went straight through and went through another 2x6 a short distance beyond sideways, you could see the profile of the bullet in the second 2x6 and again straight through. So the jacketed bullet does not disintegrate, at best it will break up into sizable pieces and they would have found them during the autopsy. What they found were very small particles representative of an AR15 round, not a 6.5mm carcano round. You also saw in the “smoking gun” video that the secret service directed a “technician” to tape fragment’s of a jacketed bullet to the x-rays trying to make it look like JFK was shot with a jacketed bullet.
The frangible round that came out of the AR15 is designed to disintegrate and usually explodes after penetration. If a bullet were designed to disintegrate on impact than theoretically all you would get is a skin abrasion, there would be no penetration of the skull. 
There have been others that have used computer analysis to show that the single bullet theory is possible
Your link only showed a cover page, no ballistics information
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 03:15:24 PM
What do you think Hickey is going to say, of course he is going to deny holding the gun when the fatal shot was fired. 
The photo Willis 05 shows Hickey sitting and we can’t see if he is holding a gun or not. But this is 6 seconds before the head shot. Try this when you are sitting down in a chair, quickly reach down to the ground like you are grabbing something and then stand up quickly. I timed myself at 2 seconds. It takes a fraction of a second to squeeze off a round. All of that can easily be achieved in the amount of time between the second and the third shot.
Sorry, I am not buying the exhaust fumes. Not one witness said they smelled exhaust fumes, they said gunpowder. Where are the witnesses that smelled exhaust fumes?
The trajectory is not more consistent with the 6th floor of the TSBD which was something like 15 degrees whereas the head shot was more like 7 degrees. Consistent with it being fired from the car behind.
“Deductive logic ought to work with the evidence”. What evidence? You have not one witness saying they smelled exhaust fumes, they smelled gunpowder. You have an entry angle of 7 degrees, you have witnesses saying an agent was holding a rifle. I’m sorry you are not showing any “evidence” to the contrary.

Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 31, 2019, 03:52:50 PM
If you were looking a Hickey when the fatal shot was fired then you would not see JFK’s brains flying out of his head. If you were watching JFK and see the pink flash you would not see Hickey holding the gun. If you were looking at the gun you would not see a muzzle blast because of the AR15’s flash suppressor.  It would be difficult for anyone to be at that correct angle looking at JFK and Hickey at the same time. If you were right beside the limos you would be looking at one or the other, you can’t see both at the same time unless you are a fair distance away. Look at the Zapruder film, it didn’t show both.
You doubt my theory I am representing here but you don’t come up with your own solutions. Tell me how you have a dozen witnesses saying a SS Agent was holding a gun,

That's certainly relevant, considering that most explicitly say that Hickey was holding the rifle AFTER the last shot and that not one explicitly says he was holding the gun before or during the head shot. Also nothing in the Bronson film to indicate Hickey is standing or falling backwards.

Quote
JFK gets shot in the head from the rear, and a dozen people smell gunpowder, not car fumes?

Cars in 1963 had no catalytic convertor; it was straight exhaust. And on Elm Street, there was the sudden full-on acceleration of two large cars. Plus hearing the sound of gunfire would influence how witnesses categorized the smell.

Quote
Tell me how that happens. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfucGygm1po/VgE2DX3wJ7I/AAAAAAAAk5g/YOSO2L3ux20/s640/Altgens%2Bcrop.jpg)

Wouldn't agent William McIntyre (above, right) see some of Hickey's motions in dropping to the floor and popping back up with a long rifle in his hands in the 2.3 sec before the Altgens photo or the 3.2 sec after?

    "After the second shot, I looked at the President and witnessed his being struck
     in the head by the third and last shot. By that time, Mr. Roberts had used the
     radio in our car to direct the vehicles to a hospital. Most, if not all the agents
     in the follow-up car had drawn their weapons and agent Hickey was handling
     the AR-15. None of us could determine the origin of the shots, and no shots
     were fired by any agent."

He says he didn't turn forward until "after the second shot". The Altgens photo, by most LNers, is after the second shot.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 31, 2019, 04:50:32 PM
A jacketed bullet is not designed to disintegrate upon impact. The purpose of the jacket is to keep it together and hopefully go though more than one soldier in combat. I have personally fired jacketed bullets at 2x6 piece of wood and it went straight through and went through another 2x6 a short distance beyond sideways, you could see the profile of the bullet in the second 2x6 and again straight through.

That's a soft-tissue firing test, like Mclaren's misleading melon test. No one is arguing that the Carcano bullet would stay intact from going through soft tissue. Exactly what the military-style FMJ was designed to do.

But Carcano bullets are not designed to remain intact when striking hard tissue at full-velocity. The WC discovered that a bullet fired nose-on at full velocity will mushroom and disintegrate when it struck a radius stimulant. Same with the skull experiments. Lattimer discovered the same. And Haag:

    "People ask how the bullet went through two people and was not damaged
     but the one which hit JFK’s head fragmented on impact.
        This is because when this bullet hits a hard surface — like a skull — at full
     speed it disintegrates. When I fired into a cow bone the shot broke up into
     eight pieces.
        Fragmentation happened when the second fatal shot was fired into the right
     rear of Kennedy’s head while the bullet was at full speed."
          -- Luke Haag, "My Tests Prove Oswald was a Lone Assassin" Link (https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/346194/my-tests-prove-oswald-was-a-lone-assassin/)

Quote
So the jacketed bullet does not disintegrate, at best it will break up into sizable pieces and they would have found them during the autopsy. What they found were very small particles representative of an AR15 round, not a 6.5mm carcano round.

Haag also duplicated a hypothetical "missed shot" into the pavement (comparable to hard tissue). The Carcano bullet totally disintegrated ( Link (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/the-shot-that-missed) ).

Quote
You also saw in the “smoking gun” video that the secret service directed a “technician” to tape fragment’s of a jacketed bullet to the x-rays trying to make it look like JFK was shot with a jacketed bullet.The frangible round that came out of the AR15 is designed to disintegrate and usually explodes after penetration. If a bullet were designed to disintegrate on impact than theoretically all you would get is a skin abrasion, there would be no penetration of the skull. 
There have been others that have used computer analysis to show that the single bullet theory is possible
Your link only showed a cover page, no ballistics information

It's a link to a PDF with 56 pages ( Link (https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62296) ). Your browser may have a script-blocker or not have an in-browser PDF-viewer. Or you didn't notice the navigation panel.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 05:36:36 PM
 I can’t make out anything in the Bronson video, it’s too blurry.
I know they didn’t have catalytic converters back then but not one witness said exhaust fumes, they all said gunpowder. It certainly could have been a mix of both gunpowder and exhaust fumes. But again, they said gunpowder.
“Wouldn't agent William McIntyre (above, right) see some of Hickey's motions in dropping to the floor and popping back up with a long rifle in his hands in the 2.3 sec before the Altgens photo or the 3.2 sec after?”
After the second shot he was looking at JFK, not Hickey. The time between the second shot and the third shot could easily be 6 secs, more than enough time for Hickey to reach down, grab the AR15, and standup.
One other thing about the angle, not only was the angle not steep enough for the 6th floor of the TSBD. It is also coming from the wrong horizontal angle coming from behind left of JFK.
The only shots fired from the TSBD were from the carcano rifle, where did the 5.56mm bullet come from? Coroner measured the diameter of the hole in that back of JFK’s at 6 mm, carcano bullet diameter is 6.5 mm.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 06:56:18 PM
Shot into the pavement, sure it will disintegrate then, but not shooting at a skull. At best it would break up but no fragments of a jacketed bullet were found during the autopsy, only small particles that a frangible round makes.
So the head shot was from a frangible round, not a jacketed round.  The entry hole goes along with this “theory”. The angle of entry says not from the TSBD.
The MFF site displays alright, but they want $35 to join.    
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 31, 2019, 09:33:06 PM
I can’t make out anything in the Bronson video, it’s too blurry.

(http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/mortal_error_bronson.jpg)

At a minimum, it shows the two people on the back seat are not standing nor holding the sizable AR-15. Certainly no one has their butt above the fold-down top.

Quote
I know they didn’t have catalytic converters back then but not one witness said exhaust fumes, they all said gunpowder. It certainly could have been a mix of both gunpowder and exhaust fumes. But again, they said gunpowder.

They heard the gunshot reports. Just before or after the head shot, a siren came on so they would have been less likely to hear the sound of the acceleration of the two heavy stretch-limos. How much gunpowder smell does one little AR-15 round produce to fill up Elm Street?

Quote
“Wouldn't agent William McIntyre (above, right) see some of Hickey's motions in dropping to the floor and popping back up with a long rifle in his hands in the 2.3 sec before the Altgens photo or the 3.2 sec after?”
After the second shot he was looking at JFK, not Hickey. The time between the second shot and the third shot could easily be 6 secs, more than enough time for Hickey to reach down, grab the AR15, and standup.

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfucGygm1po/VgE2DX3wJ7I/AAAAAAAAk5g/YOSO2L3ux20/s640/Altgens%2Bcrop.jpg)

Clint Hill appears to be looking at the President. McIntyre (behind Hill) appears to be looking in Hickey's direction. It was after the Altgens photo that McIntyre turned towards the President.

Quote
One other thing about the angle, not only was the angle not steep enough for the 6th floor of the TSBD. It is also coming from the wrong horizontal angle coming from behind left of JFK.

(https://www.glocktalk.com/attachments/motorcade_schematic-jpg.279131/)

Depends on whether one trusts Donahue's placement of Kennedy's head.

Quote
The only shots fired from the TSBD were from the carcano rifle, where did the 5.56mm bullet come from? Coroner measured the diameter of the hole in that back of JFK’s at 6 mm, carcano bullet diameter is 6.5 mm.

Elastic recoil. Also easy for a half-millimeter to not be apparent with the type of rulers they had.[/quote][/quote]
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on August 31, 2019, 09:49:41 PM
Shot into the pavement, sure it will disintegrate then, but not shooting at a skull.

Same deal. Essentially a hard tissue stimulant.

Quote
At best it would break up but no fragments of a jacketed bullet were found during the autopsy, only small particles that a frangible round makes.

According to tests done by Lattimer firing Carcano bullets, "the lead core and the gliding metal jacket separated on contact with the skull." "The broken bullet scattered dozens of tiny fragments of lead along the track of the bullet from back to front through the brain."

See: "Differences in the Wounding Behavior of the Two Bullets that Struck President Kennedy; An Experimental Study" (Wound Ballistics Review, 1996 Link (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/pdf/lattimer.pdf) )

Quote

So the head shot was from a frangible round, not a jacketed round.  The entry hole goes along with this “theory”. The angle of entry says not from the TSBD.
The MFF site displays alright, but they want $35 to join.

I am able to browse for free, including the full PDF.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on August 31, 2019, 10:00:43 PM
AR-15 muzzle blast produces db167
Science says db167 can produce considerable ear damage
Did witnesses in QM hear the AR-15 firing?

The guys right beside Hickey, for instance

Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on August 31, 2019, 10:39:46 PM
A jacketed bullet is not designed to disintegrate upon impact. The purpose of the jacket is to keep it together and hopefully go though more than one soldier in combat. I have personally fired jacketed bullets at 2x6 piece of wood and it went straight through and went through another 2x6 a short distance beyond sideways, you could see the profile of the bullet in the second 2x6 and again straight through. So the jacketed bullet does not disintegrate, at best it will break up into sizable pieces and they would have found them during the autopsy. What they found were very small particles representative of an AR15 round, not a 6.5mm carcano round. You also saw in the “smoking gun” video that the secret service directed a “technician” to tape fragment’s of a jacketed bullet to the x-rays trying to make it look like JFK was shot with a jacketed bullet.
The frangible round that came out of the AR15 is designed to disintegrate and usually explodes after penetration. If a bullet were designed to disintegrate on impact than theoretically all you would get is a skin abrasion, there would be no penetration of the skull. 
There have been others that have used computer analysis to show that the single bullet theory is possible
Your link only showed a cover page, no ballistics information

... hopefully go though more than one soldier in combat
>>> That's not the primary reason
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on August 31, 2019, 11:18:09 PM
“At a minimum, it shows the two people on the back seat are not standing nor holding the sizable AR-15. Certainly no one has their butt above the fold-down top.”
Looks to me like they are not sitting in seats, but sitting on the backrests of the seats. And I can’t see if Hickey is holding anything or not.
“They heard the gunshot reports. Just before or after the head shot, a siren came on so they would have been less likely to hear the sound of the acceleration of the two heavy stretch-limos. How much gunpowder smell does one little AR-15 round produce to fill up Elm Street?”
I am not sure if one shot would fill up Elm Street or not, I don’t know how it disperses. So it’s likely it mixed with exhaust fumes. But I can’t ever remember car exhaust smelling like gunpowder.
“Depends on whether one trusts Donahue's placement of Kennedy's head.”
I haven’t seen anyone shoot it down and he was an expert witness so I am sure he would know what he it talking about. I think it was Donahue that said the holes in the skull are always larger than the bullet.
Another thought I had is an M16 would not be a snipers choice. They are bush guns, with short barrels and not likely in wide distribution back in those days. First time I saw an M16 was in the Army in the spring of 66 and at that time the Army was using the M14 in Viet Nam. So I can’t imagine a civilian would have one in 63.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 01, 2019, 02:23:31 AM
Right, that's the purpose of a full metal jacket round.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 01, 2019, 09:22:43 PM
“Same deal. Essentially a hard tissue stimulant.”
That doesn’t make any sense to me. Bullets are made to kill and a head shot is the best way to do it.
"According to tests done by Lattimer firing Carcano bullets, "the lead core and the gliding metal jacket separated on contact with the skull." "The broken bullet scattered dozens of tiny fragments of lead along the track of the bullet from back to front through the brain."

See: "Differences in the Wounding Behavior of the Two Bullets that Struck President Kennedy; An Experimental Study" (Wound Ballistics Review, 1996 Link )”
I could not find the article and your link brought up one of your pictures. What did he say about the copper jacket? Anyway you could email me the links, for some reason they aren’t working for me on here. Links to MFF, and Differences in wounding behavior…..
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 01, 2019, 09:28:23 PM
 Hickey was standing up so it wouldn’t be like the muzzle was next to anyone’s ear. I don’t remember an M16 being very loud but then that was 50 years ago. And there was only one shot. They were looking outside the limo for a shooter so it would be easy enough not to know where the shot originated from.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Jerry Organ on September 02, 2019, 01:41:36 AM
“Same deal. Essentially a hard tissue stimulant.”
That doesn’t make any sense to me. Bullets are made to kill and a head shot is the best way to do it.
"According to tests done by Lattimer firing Carcano bullets, "the lead core and the gliding metal jacket separated on contact with the skull." "The broken bullet scattered dozens of tiny fragments of lead along the track of the bullet from back to front through the brain."

See: "Differences in the Wounding Behavior of the Two Bullets that Struck President Kennedy; An Experimental Study" (Wound Ballistics Review, 1996 Link )”
I could not find the article and your link brought up one of your pictures.

Sorry. I usually test links in "Preview". Here you go. It's a PDF document.

    "Differences in the Wounding Behavior of the Two Bullets that Struck
     President Kennedy; An Experimental Study"
     (Wound Ballistics Review, 1996 Link (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/pdf/lattimer.pdf) )

Quote
What did he say about the copper jacket? Anyway you could email me the links, for some reason they aren’t working for me on here. Links to MFF, and Differences in wounding behavior…..

Lattimer used the term "gliding metal" for the jacket.

Copy the link ("Wound Ballistics of 6.5-mm Mannlicher-Carcano Ammunition": Technical Report by US Army Edgewood Arsenal) and paste it into the address window of a new browser tab, then hit return:

Code: [Select]
http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62296
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 02, 2019, 04:21:17 AM
Hickey was standing up so it wouldn’t be like the muzzle was next to anyone’s ear. I don’t remember an M16 being very loud but then that was 50 years ago. And there was only one shot. They were looking outside the limo for a shooter so it would be easy enough not to know where the shot originated from.

LOL. Get real. They were in the same car. It would be easy enough to hear a muzzle blast from a high powered rifle from 2-3 feet away. The AR15 is rated at db167

Tom Neal/EF
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22846-fbi-decibel-test-of-c2766/

'I believe the 130 db and the statement that no one had ANY difficulty determining the origin of the test-shots came from Don Thomas' book which I mentioned in an earlier post on the "Paraffin" thread. I no longer have the book so I can't verify this.

The 120 db threshold of pain that you cited came from a study I was part of, which was used to require ear protection be provided for the ramp workers at major airports serving large jets. It did NOT endear us to management, but interestingly enough we received letters of commendation from the USAF and Air National Guard. The accepted criteria at the time was the range of 120-140db was the danger zone with hearing protection required above 140 and "suggested" above 120. As you stated, 140 db is one hell of a lot louder that 120."
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Allan Fritzke on September 02, 2019, 05:36:19 PM
Going back to the scene of the crime, one of the first reporters reported that their was a "single shot followed by 2 shots in short succession".  If he was right,  there was an interlude and not possible for 3 shots to come from a bolt action rifle which would need even spacing to allow for reloading.  Was his initial reporting to the anchor wrong?  He certainly did not describe 3 evenly spaced shots!

If you were downwind of the shot, you could smell gunpowder if it came from the front of the car, not vice versa.  The "man" rolling and tumbling across the grass while no one else reacts certainly is a red flag/herring as he appears to have momentum with his movement.    Was this really Malcom Summers who was first interviewed in 1988? The man closest to the assassination?  He had changed stories so much!  Why no statement 25 years earlier?   As well,  AP cameraman Altgens can't seem to pull the trigger on his camera.  It would be interesting to see his film to see if there was a missing frame in the negatives!    The President's car started to speed up after the SS agent jumps on the back after trotting up from the backup car - very slow movement of vehicles in order to facilitate that move that can't be made up!  Why was that?

There were 2 light anomalies present on the windshield in the Zapruder Film which could have been created by shattered glass.   Again, the second prime witness sitting beside JFK that counted the most and watched the whole gruesome event never produced a statement for the investigation.   This tells me that there is present an obstruction of justice and a massive coverup.  Some at the hospital seemed to think there was a gunshot hole in the windshield as well.   No one allowed near the car.   The body of JFK whisked away at gunpoint defying Texas state law!  Statements were made to cover the fact that some suspected a hole in the windshield.  It was almost as if it was an after the fact paper move to cover up a rumor that was started!  That is was there to tie up loose ends!

Certainly most witnesses thought the shots came from the grassy knoll as that was the initial stampede direction and where everyone was initially looking.  Surely all these people didn't think the shots came from the TSBD building when they ran in that direction to see who fired the shots.  Logic dictates there was sound emanating from the forward direction of the car.

Having a lack of investigation of the car at the time and having it whisked away back to Washington without any police investigation there, certainly raises another red flag.   The only thing known later was that the windshield was changed and those reports were documented after the car was detained in a controlled environment.  Just a fragment of a fragmented bullet wipes out the windshield?  That should be recreated!   

Another red flag was the magic bullet.  As the document pointed out by Jerry Organ from Maryferrel.org, they could never duplicate a larger entrance wound than exit with Connally's wrist.  Was it merely the angle of entrance versus angle of exit?  A lack of answers to fundamental questions fuels the CTers and rightly so!

   
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 03, 2019, 03:15:50 PM
JO, thanks for the two reports, I was able to read both of them.

JFK’s skull pieces flew 10-12 ft but in their experiments they went 30-40 ft, something is wrong with that.

They found the two large bullet fragments in the front of the limo while his skull pieces blasted 10-12 ft in the air to the right. Something doesn’t sound right with the physics. Sounds like the two large bullet fragments were planted for some reason.

Why didn’t the tests by Lattimer find any copper fragments in the brain cavity?

Why no mention of the diameter of the head entry wound in either reports.

I wonder if they weighed all the fragments, seems to be a lot of small bullet fragments and large two frags. I would have weighed them to make sure I didn’t have more than one bullet.

I don’t think you can say McLaren’s melon test is misleading when Lattimer references Dr Luis Alvarez’s melon experiment. In the case of McLaren he wanted to see the difference between what a jacketed bullet and a frangible bullet was. Alvarez was using the melon experiment to show why JFK’s head reacted from a bullet from the rear the way it did.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 03, 2019, 03:21:22 PM
A gun with a flash suppressor on it deadens a lot of the sound also. So the difference between a muzzle blast and the crack of a bullet overhead may be perceived as the same thing under the circumstances. Just guessing.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Royell Storing on September 03, 2019, 04:51:17 PM
Like to know what you think "right after" means. Instantly? One second? Four or five seconds?

Well, if you could find someone who noticed Hickey go to the floor (which is where you have the AR-15) in the 5.5 sec between Z213 (the last Z-frame his head is in) and Z313, that would be a start. But remember, during the 2.3 sec between Z213 and Z255 (the Altgens photo), Hickey has to go to the floor, grab the rifle, pop back up and turn his head towards the rear.

If not then, Hickey has to do the same (except instead of turning his head backward, he'll be turning it forward) in the 3.2 sec between the Altgens photo and the head shot. And he has turn off the safety, stand up and lose his balance.

(https://cssanimation.rocks/images/posts/clocks/twelve.gif)

I know of absolutely none. But by Mike Carney's count, there are eleven:

    "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."

    I continue to Stress: (1) SA Hickey's HIGHLY ELEVATED seated position inside the Queen Mary, (2) SA Hickey's Head when Seated was HIGHER than the Top of the Queen Mary windshield, and (3) The Queen Mary being situated HIGHER than the JFK Limo due to Elm St running Down Hill.  SA Hickey did NOT need to Stand Straight Up/Erect in order to allegedly fire a shot from the Queen Mary and hit JFK's Head.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 03, 2019, 11:44:44 PM

    "Howard Donohue went through the Warren Report and found eleven witnesses
     that put the AR15 in Agent Hickeys hand at the time of the third shot. Of the
     eleven witnesses, seven are Secret Service agents."

I got this out of "JFK - The Smoking Gun" by Colin McLaren", it's an hour and twenty minutes long and it's $3 to watch it on youtube. I suggest everyone watch it and then let's continue talking. It shows the extent that the Secret Service went to to cover it up and there's only one reason they would have to cover it up.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Peter Kleinschmidt on September 04, 2019, 06:11:30 AM
So they're driving down Elm street and in full view of everyone and cameras, Hickey reaches down and grabs his Colt AR-15 then stands up, aims and shoots Kennedy in the head? You have got to be kidding? I'm still laughing that's seriously nuts!

It's not easy to hide a Colt AR-15.

(http://thejournalofanomalousscience.com/graphics/documentaries/Hinkley_w-Rifle.png)

Btw most CTs believe that shooting a man in a moving car was impossible, so is a man in a moving car shooting another man in a moving car impossible squared?

JohnM
I am surprised that you used a picture with a gun, an authentic picture at that, unlike those silly back yard ones that you thought were authentic-big difference
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Mike Orr on September 04, 2019, 07:13:44 PM
No
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 04, 2019, 10:30:14 PM
JohnM
Hickey does not aim and shoot. He reaches down and grabs the AR15, he stands up on the rear seat, the car decelerates or accelerates, he loses his balance, he accidentally squeezes off a round. It’s an accident, just bad luck it was pointing at the back JFK’s head.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Royell Storing on September 04, 2019, 11:09:58 PM
JohnM
Hickey does not aim and shoot. He reaches down and grabs the AR15, he stands up on the rear seat, the car decelerates or accelerates, he loses his balance, he accidentally squeezes off a round. It’s an accident, just bad luck it was pointing at the back JFK’s head.

      The AR-15 could have allegedly discharged as SA Hickey was taking the safety off. Hickey does NOT need to stand upright or stand on top of anything for a possible shot fired to clear the top of the Queen Mary windshield. Just look at Z-205 or Z-206. SA Hickey's seated position has his upper body at a level well above the top of the windshield in front of him.  Z-205 and Z-206 show Hickey's light colored dress shirt along with the tie hanging down his chest.   
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Michael Carney on September 07, 2019, 05:02:13 PM
I came across this video this morning, it's a shortened version of "JFK - The Smoking Gun", for those of you that haven't seen it, it's free on youtube
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Marjan Rynkiewicz on November 25, 2023, 01:21:55 AM
      The AR-15 could have allegedly discharged as SA Hickey was taking the safety off. Hickey does NOT need to stand upright or stand on top of anything for a possible shot fired to clear the top of the Queen Mary windshield. Just look at Z-205 or Z-206. SA Hickey's seated position has his upper body at a level well above the top of the windshield in front of him.  Z-205 and Z-206 show Hickey's light colored dress shirt along with the tie hanging down his chest.
bump
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Richard Smith on November 25, 2023, 02:15:47 AM
JohnM
Hickey does not aim and shoot. He reaches down and grabs the AR15, he stands up on the rear seat, the car decelerates or accelerates, he loses his balance, he accidentally squeezes off a round. It’s an accident, just bad luck it was pointing at the back JFK’s head.

Such idiocy.  Imagine the odds that a random, accidental shot fired by Hickey would hit - of all people in Dealey Plaza - JFK squarely in the head. No sane person can entertain this as a possibility.  That doesn't even get into the massive cover up including everyone in the car with Hickey. 
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Marjan Rynkiewicz on November 25, 2023, 02:24:31 AM
Such idiocy.  Imagine the odds that a random, accidental shot fired by Hickey would hit - of all people in Dealey Plaza - JFK squarely in the head. No sane person can entertain this as a possibility.  That doesn't even get into the massive cover up including everyone in the car with Hickey.
U need to divide thems odds & possibility by 4 or 5, koz Hickey fired 4 or 5 shots.
So, that brings it down from say..............
...... 1 in 5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 to only
...... 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 -- much more believable.
But, the odds of something that happened happened is.............
...... 1 in 1.
Title: Re: Did Hickey Fire the Fatal Shot - Originally Posted by Tom Dooley
Post by: Marjan Rynkiewicz on November 25, 2023, 02:34:44 AM
Such idiocy.  Imagine the odds that a random, accidental shot fired by Hickey would hit - of all people in Dealey Plaza - JFK squarely in the head. No sane person can entertain this as a possibility.  That doesn't even get into the massive cover up including everyone in the car with Hickey.
Imagine the odds that George Warren Hickey had been named John Fitzgerald, & that JFK had been named George Warren.
No sane person can entertain this as a possibility.
It would have resulted in u saying..........
....Imagine the odds that a random, accidental shot fired by Hickey would hit - of all people in Dealey Plaza - GWK squarely in the head. Such idiocy..........