JFK Assassination Forum
The JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Robin Unger on April 20, 2026, 03:04:30 PM
-
Nova "Cold Case" JFK
54-Min (720p)
https://dn720206.ca.archive.org/0/items/ColdCaseJFK/Cold%20Case%20JFK.mp4
(https://i.postimg.cc/d1p6pDcW/20260421-072441.jpg)
-
John Conally in the Hospital following the assassination attempt:
(https://i.postimg.cc/MHdmmGJY/20260421-004603.jpg)
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/5NtBMvzf/20260421-011249.jpg)
-
Nova "Cold Case" JFK
54-Min (720p)
https://dn720206.ca.archive.org/0/items/ColdCaseJFK/Cold%20Case%20JFK.mp4
(https://i.postimg.cc/43TFWmhL/20260421-002911.jpg)
Thanks for posting that. I can't remember when I first saw this program but I'm thinking it's been about 10 years. I find the work of Luke and Michael Haas to be fascinating. Their thorough and meticulous examination of the ballistic issues shows a high degree of professionalism. Their work addresses many of the technical objections to the SBT and demonstrates that those objections are invalid. The SBT stands up to scientific scrutiny.
-
Thanks for posting that. I can't remember when I first saw this program but I'm thinking it's been about 10 years. I find the work of Luke and Michael Haas to be fascinating. Their thorough and meticulous examination of the ballistic issues shows a high degree of professionalism. Their work addresses many of the technical objections to the SBT and demonstrates that those objections are invalid. The SBT stands up to scientific scrutiny.
Thanks John.
Yes i agree, their ballistic demonstrations were very interesting.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/fL6CF1jf/20260421-044524.jpg)
-
Zapruder Film:
(https://i.postimg.cc/hPq6tZNp/20260421-074644.jpg)
-
Part way throo Nova, at 6:55 Clint Hill says some silly stuff.
CH did not hear Oswald's first shot at say pseudo Z110, koz CH says that CH heard the first shot from over CH's shoulder at which time jfk grabbed at jfk's throat.
Then CH correctly says that there woz a shot that CH did not hear, while CH was running (this woz of course the headshot at Z312).
Then CH says that CH heard a shot az CH woz nearing the jfk limo, & CH says that this woz the headshot.
Memory iz fraught.
-
Part way throo Nova, at 6:55 Clint Hill says some silly stuff.
CH did not hear Oswald's first shot at say pseudo Z110, koz CH says that CH heard the first shot from over CH's shoulder at which time jfk grabbed at jfk's throat.
Then CH correctly says that there woz a shot that CH did not hear, while CH was running (this woz of course the headshot at Z312).
Then CH says that CH heard a shot az CH woz nearing the jfk limo, & CH says that this woz the headshot.
Memory iz fraught.
Yes it is.
I have to believe that the shot Clint Hill did not hear was the first shot and the first shot he heard was actually the second shot which struck JFK in the back.
It's hard to understand why some people did not seem to hear the first shot. Either that or did not recognize it as a gunshot. It might be because of the roar of the motorcycles accelerating out of the sharp turn onto Elm St. muffled the sound of that first shot. JBC clearly heard it and recognized it for what is was. Jack and Jackie seem not to have noticed. Perhaps that is because they were a bit closer to the motorcycles. Who knows.
-
At 23:47 we see SSA Hickey sitting in the rear of a limo to help with the SBT alignment tests. Hickey fired the shot at Z312.
Sturdivan reckoned that the head entry woz actually very low, ie where originally claimed, not high up.
Ok, the big lie that i see. At 49:57 they say that Carcano bullets deformed in skulls in tests. Bs.
They of course did not show us the deformed or fragmented test bullets.
-
At 23:47 we see SSA Hickey sitting in the rear of a limo to help with the SBT alignment tests. Hickey fired the shot at Z312.
Sturdivan reckoned that the head entry woz actually very low, ie where originally claimed, not high up.
Ok, the big lie that i see. At 49:57 they say that Carcano bullets deformed in skulls in tests. Bs.
They of course did not show us the deformed or fragmented test bullets.
Hickey did not fire the headshot. Caraco bullets will deform when striking something hard, like the dense bone of a human skull. We know that because there was a shattered bullet found on the floor of the limo and two of those fragments had sufficient markings to positively match them to Oswald's Carcano. Why would you need to see the deformed test bullets when we have the evidence of the deformed Carcano bullet taken from the actual shooting.
-
Hickey did not fire the headshot. Caraco bullets will deform when striking something hard, like the dense bone of a human skull. We know that because there was a shattered bullet found on the floor of the limo and two of those fragments had sufficient markings to positively match them to Oswald's Carcano. Why would you need to see the deformed test bullets when we have the evidence of the deformed Carcano bullet taken from the actual shooting.
The 2 half jackets found in the jfk limo were from Oswald's first shot which ricocheted offa the signal arm at pseudo Z105-110.
When i watched the Nova footage i woz hoping to see Haag's tests for ricochet offa a 2 inch pipe, which i had uzed a few years ago to develop my theory. But i woz disappointed to find that Nova did not include Haag's ricochet tests.
Haag's witness board showed three kinds of ricochet. (1) the remnant lead slug (which made a hole in the floor of the limo). (2) the copper jacket, in 2 pieces, koz Carcano slug jackets were made in 2 pieces, hence they fragmented into 2 pieces (found in limo). (3) A lead spray splatter (which was seen in xrays of jfk skull.
My analysis showed that Oswald's shot-1 ricochet must hav included one of the steel side struts. And my analysis showed that Oswald was not aiming for Connally.
I think that i hav lost Haag's ricochet test info.
I feel sure that no-one will ever show me/u/us a badly deformed Carcano slug that has been deformed by a skull, or a badly fragmented Carcano slug that has been fragmented by a skull.
I seem to recall that there are lots of youtubes showing similar slugs passing throo windshield glass & suffering near zero damage.
And footage of slugs passing throo windshields & then test jelly & suffering no bad damage.
-
I know you guys and Cronkite enjoy echoing the Nova "test" stuff Ad nauseam. But, how about just telling this Forum what YOU see? Do you see: (1) A Pristine Bullet/CE 399? (2) JFK's head explode on contact? People want to rely on the JFK Assassination "images" until they don't.
-
I know you guys and Cronkite enjoy echoing the Nova "test" stuff Ad nauseam. But, how about just telling this Forum what YOU see? Do you see: (1) A Pristine Bullet/CE 399? (2) JFK's head explode on contact? People want to rely on the JFK Assassination "images" until they don't.
I don't know where you are going with this but CE399 is not pristine and JFK's head did explode.
-
I don't know where you are going with this but CE399 is not pristine and JFK's head did explode.
Of course you do Not know where I am going. Your JFK Assassination Foundation is weak. You make this obvious everyday.
-
Of course you do Not know where I am going. Your JFK Assassination Foundation is weak. You make this obvious everyday.
Anyone who dreams up absurd theories based on the flimsiest of evidence as you do ought not be telling somebody else their foundation is weak.
-
Anyone who dreams up absurd theories based on the flimsiest of evidence as you do ought not be telling somebody else their foundation is weak.
So, "prove" me wrong. (1) Prove there is a car parked alongside the Island on the Wiegman Film, and (2) Prove that's Motorcycle Officer Haygood with Officer Harkness on the Darnell Film.
I also recently found another piece of evidence regarding what I believe was the "getaway" car. If you're interested let me know. I don't want to pile on. The Evidence Needle is already "pegged" in my direction.
-
So, "prove" me wrong. (1) Prove there is a car parked alongside the Island on the Wiegman Film, and (2) Prove that's Motorcycle Officer Haygood with Officer Harkness on the Darnell Film.
I also recently found another piece of evidence regarding what I believe was the "getaway" car. If you're interested let me know. I don't want to pile on. The Evidence Needle is already "pegged" in my direction.
I've told you this a number of times before. The person proposing a hypothesis has the burden of supplying the proof to support it. A hypothesis isn't accepted as the default truth until somebody disproves it. The person proposing it has the burden of proving it is correct. You haven't even come close to doing that.
I really don't care if you post additional "evidence" for your theory or not. Given the quality of what you've posted so far, I doubt it would make much difference.
However, if you really believe you've made a bombshell discovery that has eluded an army of amateur researchers for the past 62 years, why are you wasting your time presenting it to the major legacy news organizations. They can reach a much bigger audience than what you have here. Maybe they will be much more impressed by your research than the followers of this forum. Fame and fortune could be awaiting you.
-
I've told you this a number of times before. The person proposing a hypothesis has the burden of supplying the proof to support it. A hypothesis isn't accepted as the default truth until somebody disproves it. The person proposing it has the burden of proving it is correct. You haven't even come close to doing that.
I really don't care if you post additional "evidence" for your theory or not. Given the quality of what you've posted so far, I doubt it would make much difference.
However, if you really believe you've made a bombshell discovery that has eluded an army of amateur researchers for the past 62 years, why are you wasting your time presenting it to the major legacy news organizations. They can reach a much bigger audience than what you have here. Maybe they will be much more impressed by your research than the followers of this forum. Fame and fortune could be awaiting you.
So YOU of all people are pimping the, "major legacy news organizations"? You got Storing Derangement Syndrome (SDS) bad. A tell tale symptom being not knowing what you are saying.
-
So YOU of all people are pimping the, "major legacy news organizations"? You got Storing Derangement Syndrome (SDS) bad. A tell tale symptom being not knowing what you are saying.
I guess the sarcasm was lost on you.
-
Zapruder GIF
Zapruder frames came from the "Cold Case JFK" Documentary.
(https://i.postimg.cc/Hkq2ZSMk/Zapruder-Cold-Case-JFK.gif)