Nova "Cold Case" JFK

[Royell Storing]

I don't know where you are going with this but CE399 is not pristine and JFK's head did explode.

   Of course you do Not know where I am going. Your JFK Assassination Foundation is weak. You make this obvious everyday.

[John Corbett]

   Of course you do Not know where I am going. Your JFK Assassination Foundation is weak. You make this obvious everyday.

Anyone who dreams up absurd theories based on the flimsiest of evidence as you do ought not be telling somebody else their foundation is weak.

[Royell Storing]

Anyone who dreams up absurd theories based on the flimsiest of evidence as you do ought not be telling somebody else their foundation is weak.

   So, "prove" me wrong. (1) Prove there is a car parked alongside the Island on the Wiegman Film, and (2) Prove that's Motorcycle Officer Haygood with Officer Harkness on the Darnell Film.
   I also recently found another piece of evidence regarding what I believe was the "getaway" car. If you're interested let me know. I don't want to pile on. The Evidence Needle is already "pegged" in my direction. 

[John Corbett]

   So, "prove" me wrong. (1) Prove there is a car parked alongside the Island on the Wiegman Film, and (2) Prove that's Motorcycle Officer Haygood with Officer Harkness on the Darnell Film.
   I also recently found another piece of evidence regarding what I believe was the "getaway" car. If you're interested let me know. I don't want to pile on. The Evidence Needle is already "pegged" in my direction.

I've told you this a number of times before. The person proposing a hypothesis has the burden of supplying the proof to support it. A hypothesis isn't accepted as the default truth until somebody disproves it. The person proposing it has the burden of proving it is correct. You haven't even come close to doing that.

I really don't care if you post additional "evidence" for your theory or not. Given the quality of what you've posted so far, I doubt it would make much difference.

However, if you really believe you've made a bombshell discovery that has eluded an army of amateur researchers for the past 62 years, why are you wasting your time presenting it to the major legacy news organizations. They can reach a much bigger audience than what you have here. Maybe they will be much more impressed by your research than the followers of this forum. Fame and fortune could be awaiting you.

[Royell Storing]

I've told you this a number of times before. The person proposing a hypothesis has the burden of supplying the proof to support it. A hypothesis isn't accepted as the default truth until somebody disproves it. The person proposing it has the burden of proving it is correct. You haven't even come close to doing that.

I really don't care if you post additional "evidence" for your theory or not. Given the quality of what you've posted so far, I doubt it would make much difference.

However, if you really believe you've made a bombshell discovery that has eluded an army of amateur researchers for the past 62 years, why are you wasting your time presenting it to the major legacy news organizations. They can reach a much bigger audience than what you have here. Maybe they will be much more impressed by your research than the followers of this forum. Fame and fortune could be awaiting you.

  So YOU of all people are pimping the, "major legacy news organizations"? You got Storing Derangement Syndrome (SDS) bad. A tell tale symptom being not knowing what you are saying.

[John Corbett]

  So YOU of all people are pimping the, "major legacy news organizations"? You got Storing Derangement Syndrome (SDS) bad. A tell tale symptom being not knowing what you are saying.

I guess the sarcasm was lost on you.