JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Rob Caprio on February 14, 2019, 06:05:42 PM
-
...and you are dead.
I have been told, and I have read, over the years that Jackie Kennedy was given red roses because they were out of yellow ones. This sounds ridiculous, but I have accepted it despite her receiving yellow roses just the day before.
Imagine my surprise when listening to as it happened coverage on KLIF when hearing Lady Bird Johnson received YELLOW roses at Love Field upon arrival!
Those roses were a signal most likely IMO. Yellow=abort. Red=go.
-
...and you are dead.
I have been told, and I have read, over the years that Jackie Kennedy was given red roses because they were out of yellow ones. This sounds ridiculous, but I have accepted it despite her receiving yellow roses just the day before.
Imagine my surprise when listening to as it happened coverage on KLIF when hearing Lady Bird Johnson received YELLOW roses at Love Field upon arrival!
Those roses were a signal most likely IMO. Yellow=abort. Red=go.
Red Roses for Jackie.... and Red Rings on the windows for LBJ.....
-
...and you are dead.
I have been told, and I have read, over the years that Jackie Kennedy was given red roses because they were out of yellow ones. This sounds ridiculous, but I have accepted it despite her receiving yellow roses just the day before.
Imagine my surprise when listening to as it happened coverage on KLIF when hearing Lady Bird Johnson received YELLOW roses at Love Field upon arrival!
Those roses were a signal most likely IMO. Yellow=abort. Red=go.
That is tin foil hat nonsense even by prior low standards, but why would LBJ need a signal? Even if he was involved in the assassination plot, he would see for himself if anything happened. He was in the motorcade. He wouldn't have any action to take in the act other than to become President if it succeeds. If he needed a signal, however, why couldn't it be yellow roses? I will give you some credit though. Some sources suggest LadyBird's flowers were white but they do appear to be yellow in the color photos. The flower on LBJ's suit is white.
-
That is tin foil hat nonsense even by prior low standards, but why would LBJ need a signal? Even if he was involved in the assassination plot, he would see for himself if anything happened. He was in the motorcade. He wouldn't have any action to take in the act other than to become President if it succeeds. If he needed a signal, however, why couldn't it be yellow roses? I will give you some credit though. Some sources suggest LadyBird's flowers were white but they do appear to be yellow in the color photos. The flower on LBJ's suit is white.
why would LBJ need a signal?
LBJ didn't need the signal, but the killers wouldn't have fired unless they had assurance from LBJ that he'd cover their backs....So the Red Rings were multipurpose....
A) A reminder to JFK that he had betrayed the killers when he pulled the air cover that the CIA had promised would be there at Red beach at BOP.....The umbrella man with his umbrella, was also a reminder to JFK that he'd pulled the umbrella of air cover at BOP....
B) A signal to LBJ, that the trap was set and the patsy was staying out of sight on the first floor .....
C) LBJ's signal to the killers....Proceed....I'll cover your backs....
-
That is tin foil hat nonsense even by prior low standards, but why would LBJ need a signal? Even if he was involved in the assassination plot, he would see for himself if anything happened. He was in the motorcade. He wouldn't have any action to take in the act other than to become President if it succeeds. If he needed a signal, however, why couldn't it be yellow roses? I will give you some credit though. Some sources suggest LadyBird's flowers were white but they do appear to be yellow in the color photos. The flower on LBJ's suit is white.
Yeah, this takes the cake(bread)... surely one of the top OMG moments in tin foil hat history
-
why would LBJ need a signal?
LBJ didn't need the signal, but the killers wouldn't have fired unless they had assurance from LBJ that he'd cover their backs....So the Red Rings were multipurpose....
A) A reminder to JFK that he had betrayed the killers when he pulled the air cover that the CIA had promised would be there at Red beach at BOP.....The umbrella was also a reminder to JFK that he'd pulled the umbrella of air cover at BOP....
B) A signal to LBJ, that the trap was set and the patsy was staying out of sight on the first floor .....
C) LBJ's signal to the killers....Proceed....I'll cover your backs....
This is where I hope you are putting us on. Imagine all this last second skulduggery after months or years of setting up Oswald. It is laughable Maxwell Smart nonsense. It's hard to pick my favorite part but what exactly would your fantasy conspirators have done with the red rings and roses had their patsy not been "out of sight" at the fatal moment. Would they have leaned out the windows and removed them as the motorcade swept past? Whew. I also like the part where JFK is given a "reminder that he betrayed the killers." How exactly would the red rings do that? Even assuming JFK had superhuman powers of observation and noticed the rings in the window of one building among hundreds along the motorcade route, how would this remind him of the BOP? Absurd.
-
This is where I hope you are putting us on. Imagine all this last second skulduggery after months or years of setting up Oswald. It is laughable Maxwell Smart nonsense. It's hard to pick my favorite part but what exactly would your fantasy conspirators have done with the red rings and roses had their patsy not been "out of sight" at the fatal moment. Would they have leaned out the windows and removed them as the motorcade swept past? Whew. I also like the part where JFK is given a "reminder that he betrayed the killers." How exactly would the red rings do that? Even assuming JFK had superhuman powers of observation and noticed the rings in the window of one building among hundreds along the motorcade route, how would this remind him of the BOP? Absurd.
Psssst.... It wasn't last second skulduggery .... But it was the final step... To insure that LBJ really was behind them and as the POTUS he could control the investigation...
what exactly would your fantasy conspirators have done with the red rings and roses had their patsy not been "out of sight" at the fatal moment.
If Lee Oswald had been standing on the front step, or anyplace where a camera could have recorded his presence at the time that JFK was to be murdered , the mission would have been aborted.
-
That is tin foil hat nonsense even by prior low standards, but why would LBJ need a signal? Even if he was involved in the assassination plot, he would see for himself if anything happened. He was in the motorcade. He wouldn't have any action to take in the act other than to become President if it succeeds. If he needed a signal, however, why couldn't it be yellow roses? I will give you some credit though. Some sources suggest LadyBird's flowers were white but they do appear to be yellow in the color photos. The flower on LBJ's suit is white.
Who said that the signal was for LBJ besides you? It would have been for the sniper teams.
-
Yeah, this takes the cake(bread)... surely one of the top OMG moments in tin foil hat history
And yet, you can't explain why Mrs. Johnson received yellow roses while Jackie Kennedy received red roses when she received yellow ones the day before.
-
And in your twisted mind this is somehow nefarious? And on top of it, you want somebody else to explain it to you. You are the poster boy for the tin hat society. What an embarrassment you are to research.
-
And yet, you can't explain why Mrs. Johnson received yellow roses while Jackie Kennedy received red roses when she received yellow ones the day before.
Why don't you ask this question of the people you work with and see how long before they start avoiding eye contact with you?
-
Who said that the signal was for LBJ besides you? It would have been for the sniper teams.
It's difficult to piece together your ramblings. The roses were given to Jackie at Love Field. Are you saying your fantasy "sniper team" needed a signal at Love Field? They then jumped into their cars like the Wacky Racers and headed to DP to set up the kill? Are you goofing on us to pass the time? If you think there is even a one in a billion chance that anything like that happened, it is not a healthy sign. As for LBJ, check with your kindred Walt. He suggested LBJ was getting a signal.
-
I don't think the color of any of the roses had ANYTHING to do with it Plain and simple . Red roses typically mean " LOVE". Yellow roses....friendship. But...I doubt they meant anything at all. Sorry...not my ' conspiracy angle" at all. I just think that's way too overboard.
-
It's difficult to piece together your ramblings. The roses were given to Jackie at Love Field. Are you saying your fantasy "sniper team" needed a signal at Love Field? They then jumped into their cars like the Wacky Racers and headed to DP to set up the kill? Are you goofing on us to pass the time? If you think there is even a one in a billion chance that anything like that happened, it is not a healthy sign. As for LBJ, check with your kindred Walt. He suggested LBJ was getting a signal.
The only wacky one here is you. You have failed to explain why Lady Bird Johnson received yellow roses at Love Field, but Jackie Kennedy received red roses. Well?
-
I don't think the color of any of the roses had ANYTHING to do with it Plain and simple . Red roses typically mean " LOVE". Yellow roses....friendship. But...I doubt they meant anything at all. Sorry...not my ' conspiracy angle" at all. I just think that's way too overboard.
You're entitled to your opinion, but that is all that it is. Jackie Kennedy was given yellow roses on 11/21/63 so why was she given red roses on 11/22/63?
-
The only wacky one here is you. You have failed to explain why Lady Bird Johnson received yellow roses at Love Field, but Jackie Kennedy received red roses. Well?
Caprio 101. Make a ludicrous, baseless claim like the roses were a "signal" and then ask others to "explain" it to his subjective kooky satisfaction. You claimed it was a "signal" to a "sniper team." Why don't you explain that with "supporting evidence"? It's absurd. There is no significance to the roses that needs any explanation. You should be ashamed.
-
Caprio 101. Make a ludicrous, baseless claim like the roses were a "signal" and then ask others to "explain" it to his subjective kooky satisfaction. You claimed it was a "signal" to a "sniper team." Why don't you explain that with "supporting evidence"? It's absurd. There is no significance to the roses that needs any explanation. You should be ashamed.
It's NOT baseless as you falsely state. The entire trip, which included other motorcades, Jackie Kennedy received yellow roses, but in Dallas she is handed red roses. Why? Your failure to answer this question shows that you are the one making baseless statements.
For many years it was said by WC endorsers that they were out of yellow roses, but this is false (or a deliberate lie) for two reasons. Firstly, as I stated KLIF mentioned that Lady Bird Johnson received yellow roses (and this is supported by a photo that shows she is holding a bouquet of yellow roses). Secondly, the radio announcers said that the roses were flown in from California for the special occasion. Since they were flown in it is impossible that they were out of the yellow roses.
Once again you post nothing of value post after post.
-
Psssst.... It wasn't last second skulduggery .... But it was the final step... To insure that LBJ really was behind them and as the POTUS he could control the investigation...
what exactly would your fantasy conspirators have done with the red rings and roses had their patsy not been "out of sight" at the fatal moment.
If Lee Oswald had been standing on the front step, or anyplace where a camera could have recorded his presence at the time that JFK was to be murdered , the mission would have been aborted.
But "they" didn't plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza to identify Oswald as the shooter why?
You conspiracy people give all sorts of explanations of the framing of Oswald - this was planted, this was altered, witnesses were coerced or coached and on and on. But when we ask the simple question as to why they didn't plant a few witnesses to say he was the assassin of JFK you become silent. You believe the witnesses who said he shot Tippit were all coached or lied about what they saw. But having people say he shot JFK is just a bridge too far?
Please, take a step back for a second and just consider the question: Does that make sense? No planted witnesses to say they saw him shoot JFK?
-
...and you are dead.
I have been told, and I have read, over the years that Jackie Kennedy was given red roses because they were out of yellow ones. This sounds ridiculous, but I have accepted it despite her receiving yellow roses just the day before.
Imagine my surprise when listening to as it happened coverage on KLIF when hearing Lady Bird Johnson received YELLOW roses at Love Field upon arrival!
Those roses were a signal most likely IMO. Yellow=abort. Red=go.
It seems if some members can't think of anything intelligent to post they just post any old crap. They're just not happy unless they post 20+ times a day. They need to get a life. Sad fu**s are a waste of forum space.
-
It seems if some members can't think of anything intelligent to post they just post any old crap. They're just not happy unless they post 20+ times a day. They need to get a life. Sad fu**s are a waste of forum space.
+ 1
-
...and you are dead.
I have been told, and I have read, over the years that Jackie Kennedy was given red roses because they were out of yellow ones. This sounds ridiculous, but I have accepted it despite her receiving yellow roses just the day before.
Imagine my surprise when listening to as it happened coverage on KLIF when hearing Lady Bird Johnson received YELLOW roses at Love Field upon arrival!
Those roses were a signal most likely IMO. Yellow=abort. Red=go.
In conspiracy circles Green = go, Red = stop, yellow = caution. In this case the combination of red and yellow means green = go.... as in GRINGO, the super secret code that was meant for the anti-Castro Cuban snipers to proceed with the plan.
-
In conspiracy circles Green = go, Red = stop, yellow = caution. In this case the combination of red and yellow means green = go.... as in GRINGO, the super secret code that was meant for the anti-Castro Cuban snipers to proceed with the plan.
Why do you consistently reply when you cannot answer the question asked?
-
Why do you consistently reply when you cannot answer the question asked?
I have supplied you with the super secret code and with those responsible for executing the deed and this is the thanks I get. :-[
-
And yet, you can't explain why Mrs. Johnson received yellow roses while Jackie Kennedy received red roses when she received yellow ones the day before.
The red roses went better with her suit?
-
I have supplied you with the super secret code and with those responsible for executing the deed and this is the thanks I get. :-[
You still have provided no answer to my question.
-
The red roses went better with her suit?
How did they know this in advance?
-
Why was Jackie given Red Roses in Dallas:
?They were Baccara roses, a hybrid tea variety introduced in 1954 by French grower Francis Meilland, which became popular for cutting, Keffer said. One variant of the deep red rose was named Jacqueline.?
-
Again, I see no significance to the roses. They were red. Fine. I buy red roses all the time. My wife loves them. Doesn't mean anything more than that I've given her red roses. If I got her yellow roses, she would be just as happy. I just don't see any connection to a " conspiracy " with the roses.
-
Why was Jackie given Red Roses in Dallas:
?They were Baccara roses, a hybrid tea variety introduced in 1954 by French grower Francis Meilland, which became popular for cutting, Keffer said. One variant of the deep red rose was named Jacqueline.?
So the cities the day before didn't know this or didn't care I guess.
-
Rob.... I never contested you. Just stated my opinion. Apparently, you want everyone who is not in total agreement with you to be out of here. What you don't realize is that for the most part I agree with most of your posts. But apparently, you only accept those who agree totally with you without exception. sorry...that's not the way life works. You have a lot to learn little boy.
-
The red roses went better with her suit?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
-
Rob.... I never contested you. Just stated my opinion. Apparently, you want everyone who is not in total agreement with you to be out of here. What you don't realize is that for the most part I agree with most of your posts. But apparently, you only accept those who agree totally with you without exception. sorry...that's not the way life works. You have a lot to learn little boy.
Yes, you gave your opinion TWICE. Here is the second time.
"Again, I see no significance to the roses. They were red. Fine. I buy red roses all the time. My wife loves them. Doesn't mean anything more than that I've given her red roses. If I got her yellow roses, she would be just as happy. I just don't see any connection to a " conspiracy " with the roses."
People who usually give nothing but their opinion only do it once. You felt the need to do it twice. This can be taken as trying to dismiss the issue and end the discussion.
I don't know you from Adam, but in typical LNer fashion you pass judgment on me. Again, if you see nothing odd here then don't participate. It is that easy.
-
It was suggested that maybe the red roses went with Jackie Kennedy's outfit. A KBOX as it happened report stated that the red roses *clashed* with her outfit.
I am not a fashion designer so I don't know, but I wanted to mention this.
-
It was suggested that maybe the red roses went with Jackie Kennedy's outfit. A KBOX as it happened report stated that the red roses *clashed* with her outfit.
I am not a fashion designer so I don't know, but I wanted to mention this.
This may be your greatest contributions to the case since you asked how the limo knew the way to Parkland and cast dispersion on the notion that they simply followed the DPD motorcycles. Time well spent. I'm still waiting for your follow up "research" on why the firetrucks showed up at the TSBD with the implication that the real assassin escaped dressed as a firefighter. That was comedy gold. Firetrucks are also red. So that must be a signal as well.
-
This may be your greatest contributions to the case since you asked how the limo knew the way to Parkland and cast dispersion on the notion that they simply followed the DPD motorcycles. Time well spent. I'm still waiting for your follow up "research" on why the firetrucks showed up at the TSBD with the implication that the real assassin escaped dressed as a firefighter. That was comedy gold. Firetrucks are also red. So that must be a signal as well.
And yet, a local reporter at the TSBD shortly after the assassination posed the same question. Why was a firetruck there? All these years later and Smith has never provided a viable answer.
-
And yet, a local reporter at the TSBD shortly after the assassination posed the same question. Why was a firetruck there? All these years later and Smith has never provided a viable answer.
Let me guess. You are not making any claim or implying that the fire trucks are involved in the assassination/conspiracy. You are just asking questions and then dismissing any non-conspiracy explanation. My recollection on the fire trucks is that the ladders and lights were used to help search the ceilings of the TSBD. In particular, a "loft" above the 7th floor. I think Gary Mack or someone indicated that was the case to you years ago. But who cares unless you are implying that it relates to a conspiracy? And the plan was for the real assassin to wait around the building dressed as firefighter until they showed up and then somehow blend in with them to escape hours later! Don't you think the firefighters might notice a phony in their midst? Comedy gold.
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth532627/m1/1/
-
And yet, a local reporter at the TSBD shortly after the assassination posed the same question. Why was a firetruck there? All these years later and Smith has never provided a viable answer.
Will you be getting back to us on the report of the firefighter that they were asked to assist in the search of the TSBD by providing equipment such as lights and ladders? After all these years don't you want to put this "question" to rest with a viable answer?
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth532627/m1/1/
-
Yes, you gave your opinion TWICE. Here is the second time.
"Again, I see no significance to the roses. They were red. Fine. I buy red roses all the time. My wife loves them. Doesn't mean anything more than that I've given her red roses. If I got her yellow roses, she would be just as happy. I just don't see any connection to a " conspiracy " with the roses."
People who usually give nothing but their opinion only do it once. You felt the need to do it twice. This can be taken as trying to dismiss the issue and end the discussion.
I don't know you from Adam, but in typical LNer fashion you pass judgment on me. Again, if you see nothing odd here then don't participate. It is that easy.
Uh, Rob, I'm not a LNer. Actually more of a CTer. Your Bad!
-
Will you be getting back to us on the report of the firefighter that they were asked to assist in the search of the TSBD by providing equipment such as lights and ladders? After all these years don't you want to put this "question" to rest with a viable answer?
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth532627/m1/1/
I would surmise that when the power was cut off in the TSBD .....That outage triggered a fire alarm at the fire station. I do know that this is SOP in many office buildings and hotels.....
-
Uh, Rob, I'm not a LNer. Actually more of a CTer. Your Bad!
Rob has difficulty discerning the difference between a Warren Commission apologist, and a Warren Committee Critique .......And that's a shame, because he attacks his fellow critiques and aids the apologists....
-
Let me guess. You are not making any claim or implying that the fire trucks are involved in the assassination/conspiracy. You are just asking questions and then dismissing any non-conspiracy explanation. My recollection on the fire trucks is that the ladders and lights were used to help search the ceilings of the TSBD. In particular, a "loft" above the 7th floor. I think Gary Mack or someone indicated that was the case to you years ago. But who cares unless you are implying that it relates to a conspiracy? And the plan was for the real assassin to wait around the building dressed as firefighter until they showed up and then somehow blend in with them to escape hours later! Don't you think the firefighters might notice a phony in their midst? Comedy gold.
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth532627/m1/1/
Just answer the question. So speculation is all that you have, but you feel comfortable enough to mock me.
There was NO fire at the TSBD, so why was a fire truck there?
-
Will you be getting back to us on the report of the firefighter that they were asked to assist in the search of the TSBD by providing equipment such as lights and ladders? After all these years don't you want to put this "question" to rest with a viable answer?
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth532627/m1/1/
This doesn't settle the issue as we can't establish that the fire truck seen on film was this guy's truck. Furthermore, why would the DPD and the FBI need firefighters to help in the search for an assassin or assassins? Is this a normal job for firefighters?
-
Uh, Rob, I'm not a LNer. Actually more of a CTer. Your Bad!
Your behavior says otherwise.
-
This doesn't settle the issue as we can't establish that the fire truck seen on film was this guy's truck. Furthermore, why would the DPD and the FBI need firefighters to help in the search for an assassin or assassins? Is this a normal job for firefighters?
LOL. This is why it is impossible to have a constructive conversation. Rob asked for a plausible explanation as to why the fire department responded to the TSBD. There is a detailed account from a firefighter involved explaining that they were asked for equipment to assist in the search - lights and ladders. Rob dismisses this obvious and documented explanation out of hand by asking if this is a "normal" job for firefighters. As though presidential assassinations were common in Dallas and there would be some precedent. Complete kookery. The explanation has been provided and documented. In the meantime, he entertains the completely baseless fantasy that the fire department was somehow involved in the conspiracy.
-
LOL. This is why it is impossible to have a constructive conversation. Rob asked for a plausible explanation as to why the fire department responded to the TSBD. There is a detailed account from a firefighter involved explaining that they were asked for equipment to assist in the search - lights and ladders. Rob dismisses this obvious and documented explanation out of hand by asking if this is a "normal" job for firefighters. As though presidential assassinations were common in Dallas and there would be some precedent. Complete kookery. The explanation has been provided and documented. In the meantime, he entertains the completely baseless fantasy that the fire department was somehow involved in the conspiracy.
It is impossible to have a conversation with you because you never cite any evidence. If a firetruck was needed as you claim then cite a call for one in the DPD dispatch log.
By the way, your claim isn't reasonable as firefighters aren't called in to search for assassins.
-
It is impossible to have a conversation with you because you never cite any evidence. If a firetruck was needed as you claim then cite a call for one in the DPD dispatch log.
By the way, your claim isn't reasonable as firefighters aren't called in to search for assassins.
You have made a baseless implication that there was something sinister about the fire department responding to the TSBD. That is totally lacking in any substantive support. But miracle of miracles, we actually have an account from one of the firefighters at the scene who explains that they were asked for equipment to assist in the search of the building. He explains in detail the specific tasks they were assigned. This is the first and only presidential assassination that I'm aware of to occur in Texas much less Dallas. So insisting that there must be some prior precedent for this unique historical situation to satisfy your subjective baseless opinion to the contrary that the fire department was "involved" or not acting "normal" is ludicrous. Absent a time machine, there doesn't appear to be any evidence that can unconvince you of this fantasy. If you believe there is a DPD dispatch log that can bolster your otherwise baseless claim that they should not have responded, then provide it. Otherwise the existent record confirms why and what the fire department was doing.
-
You have made a baseless implication that there was something sinister about the fire department responding to the TSBD. That is totally lacking in any substantive support. But miracle of miracles, we actually have an account from one of the firefighters at the scene who explains that they were asked for equipment to assist in the search of the building. He explains in detail the specific tasks they were assigned. This is the first and only presidential assassination that I'm aware of to occur in Texas much less Dallas. So insisting that there must be some prior precedent for this unique historical situation to satisfy your subjective baseless opinion to the contrary that the fire department was "involved" or not acting "normal" is ludicrous. Absent a time machine, there doesn't appear to be any evidence that can unconvince you of this fantasy. If you believe there is a DPD dispatch log that can bolster your otherwise baseless claim that they should not have responded, then provide it. Otherwise the existent record confirms why and what the fire department was doing.
You have made a baseless claim that a firetruck was called to the TSBD to assist in looking for an assassin or assassins. So far you haven't supported this in the least.
I have not made a claim as *you* brought up the firetruck. I simply wondered why it was there and so did the radio reporter.
You constantly make it about me instead of dealing with the record.
-
You have made a baseless claim that a firetruck was called to the TSBD to assist in looking for an assassin or assassins. So far you haven't supported this in the least.
I have not made a claim as *you* brought up the firetruck. I simply wondered why it was there and so did the radio reporter.
You constantly make it about me instead of dealing with the record.
How exactly is it "baseless" when there is a detailed report from a firefighter explaining why they were called to the TSBD and what they were asked to do? Unreal. A firefighter has provided a direct answer. How more could it be supported than having an explanation from a participant in question? You, on the other hand, have offered zero evidence that the presence of the fire department had anything to do with a conspiracy or frame up except for your baseless subjective opinion that it was not "normal." How about being reasonable for once and saying ok strike that one from the endless list of fantasies?
-
You're entitled to your opinion, but that is all that it is. Jackie Kennedy was given yellow roses on 11/21/63 so why was she given red roses on 11/22/63?
I would agree with you that this was some sort of signal to a sniper team, and I think umberella man was as well
-
Why was Jackie given Red Roses in Dallas:
?They were Baccara roses, a hybrid tea variety introduced in 1954 by French grower Francis Meilland, which became popular for cutting, Keffer said. One variant of the deep red rose was named Jacqueline.?
Well if it isn't robocop, howde constable I hope you are well.
I hope you can remember a long time ago I got a link in a pm from you, it had some great photos in it, one in particular I had never seen before, Oswald was in it before he was taken outside to the carpool on the morning Ruby shot him, and Fritz is seen whispering into someones ear. If you can produce it again I would be delighted.
up the Irish.
-
How exactly is it "baseless" when there is a detailed report from a firefighter explaining why they were called to the TSBD and what they were asked to do? Unreal. A firefighter has provided a direct answer. How more could it be supported than having an explanation from a participant in question? You, on the other hand, have offered zero evidence that the presence of the fire department had anything to do with a conspiracy or frame up except for your baseless subjective opinion that it was not "normal." How about being reasonable for once and saying ok strike that one from the endless list of fantasies?
Because his say-so isn't evidence. Cite a call from the DPD dispatch log calling a firetruck to assist in looking for an assassin or assassins or move along. You have hijacked the thread enough.
-
I would agree with you that this was some sort of signal to a sniper team, and I think umberella man was as well
👍
-
Roses are red....
Violets are blue....
Caprio is a documented identity thief....
And he may be after you...
-
Because his say-so isn't evidence. Cite a call from the DPD dispatch log calling a firetruck to assist in looking for an assassin or assassins or move along. You have hijacked the thread enough.
The "say-so" of the very person whose actions you have questioned isn't evidence? What exactly is it? The fireman who was involved explained in detail what was requested and why they were present. You provided no real evidence of anything here except your baseless, subjective opinion that it was not "normal" for the fire department to respond "looking for an assassin." How many prior presidential assassinations have occurred in Dallas that would form any basis for that comparison? Have you searched any dispatch log to confirm whether there is any notion that a firetruck was called? Why would such a request be contained in such a log? How would its absence cast any doubt of the report of the fireman who was there? Don't you believe it was entirely possible for someone to make such a request without it being contained in a log book?
-
The "say-so" of the very person whose actions you have questioned isn't evidence? What exactly is it? The fireman who was involved explained in detail what was requested and why they were present. You provided no real evidence of anything here except your baseless, subjective opinion that it was not "normal" for the fire department to respond "looking for an assassin." How many prior presidential assassinations have occurred in Dallas that would form any basis for that comparison? Have you searched any dispatch log to confirm whether there is any notion that a firetruck was called? Why would such a request be contained in such a log? How would its absence cast any doubt of the report of the fireman who was there? Don't you believe it was entirely possible for someone to make such a request without it being contained in a log book?
So this is your long winded way of saying that you have NO supporting evidence for your claim. Got it.
-
So this is your long winded way of saying that you have NO supporting evidence for your claim. Got it.
The supporting evidence is the detailed report of the fireman whose actions are at question. Got that? The person lacking ANY evidence here is you. Instead, as usual, you have provided your baseless subjective opinion and asked others to rebut it with evidence. And when that has been done you dismiss the evidence like some type of automated challenge response system incapable of independent cognitive functions. Simply repeating the same message over and over again.
-
Simply repeating the same message over and over again.
Says the guy who repeats "mountain of evidence" over and over again.