What happened to the Mauser?

[Jerry Freeman]

TIME:  8/24 1:25 PM
TO: BILL AMBROSINO
FROM: MARY FERRELL
SUBJECT: JFK-CIA EXPERTISE
I knew Roger Craig for several years before his death.  It is my belief
that Roger was a very sick young man.  He had made a name for himself as a
very promising young law enforcement officer.  When he came forward with
some of the "stories" he told following the events of that November
weekend, he believed that he would be offered a great deal of money and,
possibly, speaking engagements.  I am very sorry to say that I am one of
the few conspiracy nuts who never believed Roger Craig.
 When Roger made a number of speeches about the fact that "they" prevented
him from getting a job, I talked my husband into giving him a job.  Roger
did not want to work.  He wanted people to give him money because he had
"seen something or other."
I have made enemies because I have continued to say that I have never
really believed him.
Mary Ferrell    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.assassination.jfk/wwrhNDD-YGQ/YLFb8HGA2pMJ

      I don't know who this BILL AMBROSINO is or why she would write him- but 1. Ms Ferrell doesn't mention this from her personal records and 2. I have never heard her refer to herself as a "conspiracy nut" and doubt that she would. and 3. Ms Ferrell didn't 'make' any enemies. She was an amiable person, a nice lady and shared her research freely.
 

[Walt Cakebread]

I don't care about velocity. That bullet is a fraud. What about the Connally's Knickers?...what about what the Connallys said?

There's nothing complicated about the "magic Bullet" (CE 399).....  And it's not magic....Mr Howard was able to duplicate CE 399 three times with five cartridges.

The problem arises when some fool claims that CE 399 hit two men and shattered a rib and a wrist bone....   Mr Larry N.Howard fired into a bullet trap and created three replicas of CE 399 ......And that's the same way that CE 399 was created 

https://goldinauctions.com/_The_Magic_Bullet__Replica_Display_of_CE_399_Bulle-LOT27742.aspx

[Tim Nickerson]

That's not a "shipping invoice", it's an order blank.  And it doesn't show that Oswald took possession of anything.

Mr. BELIN. Mr. Waldman, you have just put the microfilm which we call D-77 into your viewer which is marked a Microfilm Reader-Printer, and you have identified this as No. 270502, according to your records. Is this just a record number of yours on this particular shipment?
Mr. WALDMAN. That's a number which we assign for identification purposes.
Mr. BELIN. And on the microfilm record, would you please state who it shows this particular rifle was shipped
Mr. WALDMAN. Shipped to a Mr. A.--last name H-i-d-e-l-l, Post Office Box 2915, Dallas, Tex.
Mr. BELIN. And does it show arts' serial number or control number?
Mr. WALDMAN. It shows shipment of a rifle bearing our control number VC-836 and serial number C-2766.
Mr. BELIN. Is there a price shown for that?
Mr. WALDMAN. Price is $19.95, plus $1.50 postage and handling, or a total of $21.45.
Mr. BELIN. Now, I see another number off to the left. What is this number?
Mr. WALDMAN. The number that you referred to, C20-T750 is a catalog number.
Mr. BELIN. And after that, there appears some words of identification or description. Can you state what that is?
Mr. WALDMAN. The number designates an item which we sell, namely, an Italian carbine, 6.5 caliber rifle with the 4X scope.
Mr. BELIN. Is there a date of shipment which appears on this microfilm record?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes; the date of shipment was March 20, 1963.
Mr. BELIN. Does it show by what means it was shipped?
Mr. WALDMAN. It was shipped by parcel post as indicated by this circle around the letters "PP."
Mr. BELIN. Does it show if any amount was enclosed with the order itself?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes; the amount that was enclosed with the order was $21.45, as designated on the right-hand side of this order blank here.
Mr. BELIN. Opposite the words "total amount enclosed"?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. Is there anything which indicates in what form you received the money?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes; below the amount is shown the letters "MO" designating money order.
Mr. BELIN. Now, I see the extreme top of this microfilm, the date, March 13, 1963; to what does that refer?
Mr. WALDMAN. This is an imprint made by our cash register indicating that the remittance received from the customer was passed through our register on that date.
Mr. BELIN. And to the right of that, I see $21.45. Is that correct?
Mr. WALDMAN. That's correct.

[John Iacoletti]

No, what it shows is that somebody circled ?PP? on a piece of paper. Where?s the postal service documentation that this package ever went through their system and was delivered or picked up?

[Tim Nickerson]

No, what it shows is that somebody circled ?PP? on a piece of paper. Where?s the postal service documentation that this package ever went through their system and was delivered or picked up?

Provide an example of the postal service documentation of the day that was used as verification for packages having passed through their system. Waldman used invoice  No. 270502 as verification that they shipped the rifle.

[John Iacoletti]

Provide an example of the postal service documentation of the day that was used as verification for packages having passed through their system. Waldman used invoice  No. 270502 as verification that they shipped the rifle.

So then there is no actual evidence of a package going through the USPS and delivered to PO Box 2915, or being signed for or picked up by Oswald or anyone else, but we should just believe that it was because somebody circled ?PP? on a piece of paper at some indeterminate time?