What happened to the Mauser?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: What happened to the Mauser?  (Read 284011 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #448 on: January 24, 2019, 02:02:49 AM »
This is not just me claiming that CE399 never received any noticeable damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone. It's wound ballistics experts like the late Martin Fackler not only claiming it but proving that it was possible as well.

TESTS PROVE THAT THE "PRISTINE BULLET" DOES NOT SUPPORT A JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY

"One bullet traveling at 1108 ft/s and one at 1335 ft/s perforated cadaver radius bones and were caught in the bullet trap. Neither bullet had any deformation whatsoever, except for rifling impressions."
 
===================================================================



That's the bullet that struck the cadaver radius at 1108 ft/s.
"experts like the late Martin Fackler not only claiming it but proving that it was possible"

The expert by saying it's "possible" is doing more to support LHO being innocent.  I say this because the gun and the bullets have so many problems with being reliable evidence. And the other question -is the gun reliable in terms of its use?  I imagine the answer would be "no but it is economical"


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #449 on: January 29, 2019, 09:44:31 PM »
The main difference between the two bullets is that CE-399 struck the rib at a much lower velocity than the bullet that struck the goat's rib.
You were out there with a stop watch I suppose?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #450 on: January 29, 2019, 10:45:19 PM »
The main difference between the two bullets is that CE-399 struck the rib at a much lower velocity than the bullet that struck the goat's rib.
I don't care about velocity. That bullet is a fraud. What about the Connally's Knickers?...what about what the Connallys said?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #451 on: January 29, 2019, 11:05:13 PM »
I don't care about velocity. That bullet is a fraud. What about the Connally's Knickers?...what about what the Connallys said?

Jerry, Jerry, Jerry....  You're simply too smart, and you've got too much commonsense....  But you're still just another pissant.   

LBJ knew us pissants could be manipulated like a puppet on a string.....just by presenting the image of the Hiroshima explosion.....


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #452 on: January 31, 2019, 10:52:12 PM »
      I have Never seen a "1960 Hoover Letter" acknowledging he knew of Lee Oswald. Anyone else on this Forum know of this 1960 Hoover Letter?

Walt's right about that one.


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #453 on: January 31, 2019, 10:54:55 PM »
138  J159796 is the File Locator Number that Oswald's money order received after it reached the US Treasury Debt. It had been cashed.

Too bad that Klein's trotted out a deposit slip from February to show that this money order was deposited into their account in March...

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: What happened to the Mauser?
« Reply #454 on: January 31, 2019, 10:56:24 PM »
If by "two parties" you mean Klein's and Oswald then the last piece of documentation between Klein's letting it go and Oswald taking possession of it would be the following shipping invoice:

That's not a "shipping invoice", it's an order blank.  And it doesn't show that Oswald took possession of anything.