What happened to the Mauser?

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

That is correct.
 

Once Klein's had placed their endorsement stamp on the money order, any additional endorsement stamps placed on it would have made it invalid.

On the back of the money order we read:

"More than one endorsement is prohibited by law. Bank stamps are not regarded as endorsements."

I don't recall Harry Holmes saying that he had found the stub. The postal regulations for the weapons were met. The regulations for rifles were quite lax. Stricter regulations applied for concealable weapons like the revolver. However, they didn't apply to Oswald's revolver since it wasn't shipped by the Postal service.

At that time, there were two places where cashed money orders were sent. One was Kansas City , Missouri. The other was Washington, D.C. From the following document:

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10408#relPageId=200&tab=page

"Lester Gohr,Assistant Cashier,Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (FRB), La Salle and Jackson Streets, Chicago, Illinois, furnished the following information:

...when the Postal Money Order in question would have been received, approximately three fourths of the money orders were being sent to Washington, D.C. and the balance to Kansas City, Missouri."

The Klein's money order was sent to Washington, D.C. At the US Dept. of Treasury, the money order received it's File Locator Number.


https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/afips/1966/5068/00/50680479.pdf

The date of March 12 stamped on the money order and on the envelop was the date that the money order was purchased and the date that it was mailed. The envelop, with the money order in it, was mailed by airmail and was received by Klein's the next day. The money order passed through Klein's cash register that day and Klein's shipped the rifle off a week later. I'm not sure when Oswald received it.

I think this is me interpreting two things and confusing them
How would you find the documentation for when the gun changed physical custody between two parties?
 

[Jerry Freeman]

.. the broken Radius is Not the Total Damage allegedly inflicted by CE399. Plus, CE399 was allegedly Tumbling and Not moving unimpeded. CE399 is alleged to Not be moving at full speed or in anything close to a straight line.

Close your eyes like some of these other guys and just say-- you've got to believe in magic.

 

[Tim Nickerson]

I think this is me interpreting two things and confusing them
How would you find the documentation for when the gun changed physical custody between two parties?

If by "two parties" you mean Klein's and Oswald then the last piece of documentation between Klein's letting it go and Oswald taking possession of it would be the following shipping invoice:

[Tim Nickerson]

Close your eyes like some of these other guys and just say-- you've got to believe in magic.

 

The main difference between the two bullets is that CE-399 struck the rib at a much lower velocity than the bullet that struck the goat's rib.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

If by "two parties" you mean Klein's and Oswald then the last piece of documentation between Klein's letting it go and Oswald taking possession of it would be the following shipping invoice:

That's what I was thinking but actually, if I remember correctly it was some form that shows the inventory maybe related to imported items.  I'm thinking companies self-monitored using their inventory books so as long as they maintained them. Too much cough syrup makes me forget

[Tim Nickerson]

That's what I was thinking but actually, if I remember correctly it was some form that shows the inventory maybe related to imported items.  I'm thinking companies self-monitored using their inventory books so as long as they maintained them. Too much cough syrup makes me forget

https://historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/contents.htm

Scroll down to the Waldman Exhibits. There are ten in all.

[Royell Storing]

The rib is a very thin bone. The damage that the bullet received upon striking it is seen in the longitudinal flattening.

                If a rib caused the "longitudinal flattening" seen on CE399, what damage to CE399 are you attributing to it allegedly Striking/Breaking the Radius Bone?  The Radius being far more dense than a Rib.