The Truly Magical Bullet

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Truly Magical Bullet  (Read 142672 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #98 on: June 02, 2018, 10:36:29 PM »
Psssssst Jimbo, I'm going to let you in on a little secret buddy, so listen closely.

Proponents of the SBT don't have to explain any missing bullets.

They don't have to explain what happened to 'both shots', because they believe one shot caused the non-fatal wounds to JFK and JBC, and that 399 is the bullet that did the wounding.

Yeah, they just have to explain why they think CE 399 actually went through any human body.


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #99 on: June 02, 2018, 10:39:41 PM »
Matt, you've got it backwards. My interpretation of CE-399 has given me no discomfort whatsoever. It's those who are confronted with it that are afflicted with cognitive calamity. Just go ahead and try coming up with a plausible alternative yourself. "A bullet falling out of JFK's back" simply will not stand up to any amount of scrutiny.

..and yet a bullet rolling out from under a pad on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland Hospital and then transforming from a pointed tip to a rounded tip somehow does.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #100 on: June 02, 2018, 10:45:32 PM »
Sheeeeeesh. Another drooling kook lecturing on critical thinking.

Yeah, it's so much easier to be a childish cowardly troll than to actually come up with a coherent argument for what you believe.

Quote
One more thing, Jackie....I haven't seen anyone use the Bible yet to prove the SBT and honestly don't know why you mentioned that, (other than your obvious drooling kook derangement) but find it interesting that you apparently choose to mock people of faith while you're busy worshipping in the Church of Saint Oz.

And there you have it folks.  He believes in the SBT and that Oswald did it as a matter of faith.  Which is why he is unable to defend it with evidence.

He believes in his own vanishing bullet, but not anyone else's.  What a tool.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #101 on: June 02, 2018, 10:53:27 PM »
The hairless pygmy once again resorts to prevaricating.

Nice try, Johnny. 'My' bullet didn't vanish. Already told you what probably happened to it.

Yeah, you said it vanished.  Who do you think you're fooling, Coward?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #102 on: June 02, 2018, 11:37:42 PM »

Which one is not true?

You claimed that CE-399 showed up clean and pristine and on the wrong gurney. None of those three are true.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #103 on: June 03, 2018, 12:20:12 AM »
Not explode in your head, for one. You're forced to conclude that the skull is somehow different from other bone to explain the conditions of CE-399 and the Head Shot bullets. That and the (cough cough) "Jet Effect".

Actually FMJ ammo was designed to pass through flesh w/o breaking up. But if it hit a large bone nose-first, the victim possibly wouldn't be so lucky, as the round could break apart and result in a shattering-type wound.

Furthermore, I understand that a bullet cannot throw a body at all and that a neurological, stiffening event caused JFK's movement backwards.

« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 12:29:51 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #104 on: June 03, 2018, 12:39:44 AM »
Wrong again, hairless one.

Still hiding behind the Incredible Hulk like the Incredible Gutless Coward that you are?

Quote
I don't have a vanishing bullet, I have a bullet that struck concrete and fragmented and was never recovered in the expanse of a plaza.

LOL.  In other words, it vanished.  You're hilarious.  Where's that bullet, Coward?

Quote
I don't believe Oswald did it as a matter of faith, I believe Oswald did it based on  evidence, which has been gone over ad infinitum.

And by "evidence, which has been gone over", you mean regurgitating the WC conclusions and trolling the forum with infantile insults.

Quote
On the other hand, you're forced to claim that every bit of evidence incriminating Saint Oz is faked, tainted, or meaningless.

Except I never claimed that.  You're just not very good at any of this, are you?