The Truly Magical Bullet

[Jack Trojan]

Tell us what FMJ ammo is designed to do, in terms of damage to itself and the victim.

Not explode in your head, for one. You're forced to conclude that the skull is somehow different from other bone to explain the conditions of CE-399 and the Head Shot bullets. That and the (cough cough) "Jet Effect".

[Howard Gee]

First off, how old are you? What's comical is that you seem to think that if the droolers can't explain where the MB went then you win and that somehow proves the SBT. Like all the LNers, you wouldn't know a logical fallacy if it bit you on the arse. You're in desperate need of some critical thinking skills.

What else is comical is that you assume the conspirators are telling the truth re where all the bullets went and what was found in the limo. The same limo that the SS and FBI scrubbed of evidence then restored for re-service. Then you resort to ridiculing everyone that doesn't believe the WC narrative like the shill and/or sucker that you are.

So tell us droolers why the MB couldn't have entered the throat and exited the back? And before you can ask where the MB went, pls explain how CE-399 showed up the way it did, clean and pristine and on the wrong gurney. How was that possible? Then show us how the MB trajectory was possible from the 6th floor of the TSBD. And don't cite some fictitious study that doesn't even address the issue.

Face it, unless you have tricks up your sleeve (besides infantile insults) you need to answer my questions before I will answer yours. And keep in mind that you can't cite the bible to prove that it's true, just like you can't use the autopsy photos,  x-rays and testimony from the conspirators to prove the SBT is true.

And lastly, us droolers only need 1 contradiction to the LNer narrative to believe there was a conspiracy, while you need to dismiss every single piece of evidence that suggests Saint Oz was not a lone nut. You do realize that both can be true, right? Instead you take the fringe position that most of the world rejects and call us kooks. Go figure.

"What's comical is that you seem to think that if the droolers can't explain where the MB went then you win and that somehow proves the SBT. Like all the LNers, you wouldn't know a logical fallacy if it bit you on the arse. You're in desperate need of some critical thinking skills."

Sheeeeeesh. Another drooling kook lecturing on critical thinking.

Listen up, Trojan. The drooling kook's inability to explain where the bullet went does not prove the SBT, it just demonstrates that the frontal entry is a fantasy.

As far as the rest of your post goes, if we can't use the autopsy photos, x-rays, witness testimony - or for that matter any photos, films, documents, witness testimony or physical evidence - because it's all been faked by the nefarious boogeyman conspirators, then what are we supposed to use ?

The drooling kooks are forced once again to claim that every piece of evidence is faked, (even though they can't show that any of it is) and simultaneously assure the rest of us that they are the sole arbiters of the truth and that there had to be a massive conspiracy to assassinate JFK and frame Saint Oz for the deed (even though they have no evidence to support their contention).

One more thing, Jackie....I haven't seen anyone use the Bible yet to prove the SBT and honestly don't know why you mentioned that, (other than your obvious drooling kook derangement) but find it interesting that you apparently choose to mock people of faith while you're busy worshipping in the Church of Saint Oz.

Challenge still on, droolers.

See if you can do better than drooling Jackie 'all the evidence is faked' Trojan.

Where did the bullet go ?

[John Iacoletti]

You asked what could have happened to a missed shot. I responded that it probably hit concrete and fragmented and rationally explained why trying to find a bullet that missed the limo and could wind up anywhere in or around the plaza would be much more difficult than finding a bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat.

You didn't "rationally explain" anything.  You just declared that it was probably the case.

I never said "Duh, I dunno...musta disappeared", and if you weren't such a hairless drooling kook you'd realize that the entire point of this thread is that a 'vanishing' bullet isn't a reasonable or plausible position to take.

And yet you believe that your bullet vanished.  Cognitive dissonance anyone?  Better throw out some more juvenile insults to cover it up.

Coward.

[John Iacoletti]

I did a study of the Zapruder film and found that Rosemary Willis started to slow down in the z160?s. She came to a complete stop by around z195 but was slowing down well before then.

. . . and you're just assuming that she's slowing down because of a gun shot?

[John Iacoletti]

Good luck with hitting the precise corner of a curb with a Carcano, or any other rifle, with a shot from 80 yards away.

Seriously, Joe?  Good luck hitting the precise corner of a guy's skull too...

[John Iacoletti]

I think there was more than one witness as I recall who saw something strike the road.

I think you base a lot of your arguments on things that you think you recall.

[Andrew Mason]

There was no blood, tissue or bone on CE-399, which is impossible.

What if it passed througb JFK's neck and stuck butt-first in JBC's left thigh? Has anyone ever tried to obtain any trace DNA from CE399? If it had JBC's DNA wedged into the base that would remove any doubt about its authenticity. There may be comparative DNA from JBC on his clothing (despite being cleaned).