It is what you say it is, apparently
Your made up BS is not evidence.How about you just STFU?
Says the guy who just decided for himself how long the bag Randle and Frazier saw was.
Show us the 24/27" bags with the 5.5"/8" widths
Nothing like a Lone Nutter as frustrated and confused as the commission he quotes,Without "visual recollection" they are left with "evidence here presented" which is the FBI conclusion there is NO trace of a rifle in that bag, CE 142. Sums up well why it sucks being a Lone Nutter.
I have no clue what the discussion about a 5.5/8 " width is about.....But if the paper sack was only 5.625" wide, then the carcano with the scope could not have fit in the bag....