Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Bill Brown]

I'll continue this discussion with you as long as it remains civil. The first time you start patronizing the conversation is over.

Based on both of our posting histories, I think we know who needs to try their damnedest to remain civil.

[Martin Weidmann]

Let's start with this....

You said:

"The point is that Callaway did not get to the Tippit scene until 1:18 or 1:19 and you can't a shred of even credible evidence that he did."

Where have I stated that Callaway was at the scene BEFORE 1:18?

Why are you already trying to confuse the issue by talking about something I did not mention in my previous post?

So, no, let's not start with that. Let's start with your reply to the comments I've just made, in which I have already started to demonstrate that a time line based on the DPD recordings/transcripts can not be correct.

We'll get to the times each individual witness (must have) arrived at the scene as we progress.

[Bill Brown]

You created nothing. You just copied what Myers and the WC said and both were wrong.

I used Ted Callaway's own words.

[Martin Weidmann]

Based on both of our posting histories, I think we know who needs to try their damnedest to remain civil.

Says the guy who just replied to a post with;

You're losing it (again).

I created an entire thread regarding the Callaway timeline and I stated that Callaway got up to the scene right around that same time.  What are you going on about?

Do you want to have an open and honest discussion or not?

[Bill Brown]

Why are you already trying to confuse the issue by talking about something I did not mention in my previous post?

So, no, let's not start with that. Let's start with your reply to the comments I've just made, in which I have already started to demonstrate that a time line based on the DPD recordings/transcripts can not be correct.

We'll get to the times each individual witness (must have) arrived at the scene as we progress.

You stated something BEFORE your "previous post" and I want it addressed before we move on to that "previous post".  Why not simply address it real quick?

You said:

"The point is that Callaway did not get to the Tippit scene until 1:18 or 1:19 and you can't a shred of even credible evidence that he did."

Are you under the mistaken impression that I have stated that Callaway was at the scene BEFORE 1:18?

[Martin Weidmann]

I used Ted Callaway's own words.

Try to reply to the entire post rather than pick something and give meaningless reply to that.

I used Callaway's words as well, and those of several others.

There are two ways of doing this;

1. we have a discussion
2. we take turns in making speeches without really addressing anything of substance in the other guy's post.

This is an example of # 2

Why not try for # 1 for once?

[Bill Brown]

Try to reply to the entire post rather than pick something and give meaningless reply to that.

I used Callaway's words as well, and those of several others.

There are two ways of doing this;

1. we have a discussion
2. we take turns in making speeches without really addressing anything of substance in the other guy's post.

This is an example of # 2

Why not try for # 1 for once?

I need this addressed first...

You stated something BEFORE your "previous post" and I want it addressed before we move on to that "previous post".  Why not simply address it real quick?

You said:

"The point is that Callaway did not get to the Tippit scene until 1:18 or 1:19 and you can't a shred of even credible evidence that he did."

Are you under the mistaken impression that I have stated that Callaway was at the scene BEFORE 1:18?