Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

[Jerry Freeman]

Yep, over the years people lose/gain weight.

Over the years? Are we referring to some middle aged Oswald?
 
 


 
 

[Matt Grantham]

 Roscoe White who worked for DPD in Nov 63 as a photography expert, had copies and a cut out of the Oswald picture in his possession when he died. White's son, upon his Fathers death, announced old Roscoe had worked for the CIA

[Matt Grantham]

He is the one John Armstrong called "Lee".

 Indeed Rob I want to thank John for providing it

[John Mytton]

Over the years? Are we referring to some middle aged Oswald?

He's not Al Bundy!? Hahaha!
While in the Marines he lost some puppy fat, big deal!



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

While in custody Oswald LIED whenever the rifle was discussed.

1. Oswald lied about owning the rifle.
2. Oswald lied that the backyard photos weren't authentic.
3. Oswald said he never saw the BY photos before but his handwriting was discovered on one.
3. Oswald lied about putting the long package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
4. Oswald told Frazier the long package contained curtain rods but told the Dallas Police that it contained his lunch.
5. Oswald lied about living at Neeley Street, (the location of the incriminating backyard photos)
6. Oswald told Fritz at the time of the assassination he had lunch with Jarman, another lie.
7. Oswald denied that he told Frazier that the reason for his unexpected visit was for curtain rods.

JohnM

Before you start claiming that Oswald lied, why don't you first prove that this is indeed what he said?

[Ray Mitcham]

Before you start claiming that Oswald lied, why don't you first prove that this is indeed what he said?

This could be interesting.

[Richard Smith]

Before you start claiming that Oswald lied, why don't you first prove that this is indeed what he said?

The same lazy nonsense over and over.  And from the guy who forever claims he is not suggesting a conspiracy or frame up.  Why is there any reason whatsoever to suggest there is doubt about what was said other than your unwillingness to take the word of those present - the only people who could know what was said?  What you are suggesting is that everything that points to Oswald guilt must be suspect for that reason alone but without explaining why.  It's laughable.  The old CTer catch-22.