Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

[Tim Nickerson]

And just to be clear the evidence he did is that Marina said she saw it. The picture and the curtain rods? Not trying to be smarmy just wanting to make sure I am not missing anything?

The evidence that he did is that Marina said she saw it, George De Mohrenschildt said he saw it, Jeanne De Mohrenschildt said she saw it, the backyard photos, the Waldman exhibits, the Klein's money order, the WC testimony of Klein's Vice President William Waldman, and Oswald's palm print being on the rifle found on the sixth floor of the TSBD.

[John Iacoletti]

And a mountain of evidence like the testimony Marina that she took the BY pictures,

You mean the Marina who originally said that she took one photo with a black camera that is held up to the face?

[John Iacoletti]

While in custody Oswald LIED whenever the rifle was discussed.

1. Oswald lied about owning the rifle.
2. Oswald lied that the backyard photos weren't authentic.
3. Oswald said he never saw the BY photos before but his handwriting was discovered on one.
3. Oswald lied about putting the long package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
4. Oswald told Frazier the long package contained curtain rods but told the Dallas Police that it contained his lunch.
5. Oswald lied about living at Neeley Street, (the location of the incriminating backyard photos)
6. Oswald told Fritz at the time of the assassination he had lunch with Jarman, another lie.
7. Oswald denied that he told Frazier that the reason for his unexpected visit was for curtain rods.

Something doesn't become a lie just because John Mytton doesn't believe it's true

[Bill Brown]

First of all, LHO didn't have to say anything as that was his right. All these years later not one LNer has provided evidence showing that he waived his right.

Secondly, we can't take anything that the authorities CLAIMED LHO said at face value since there are NO recordings. The authorities could tell us he said anything since there is no way of knowing.

Finally, there is NO supporting evidence for any of the things that you claimed LHO lied about, thus, none of them are facts so the term  "lie" is not appropriate.

Secondly, we can't take anything that the authorities CLAIMED LHO said at face value since there are NO recordings. The authorities could tell us he said anything since there is no way of knowing.

If the authorities were lying about what Oswald said or did not say in an effort to make him appear guilty, then why not just come out and make the (false) claim that Oswald admitted that he owned the rifle?  Why stop short of that?

[Bill Brown]

Yes I suppose those points are worthy for those not willing to consider a conspiracy I too would question such people on why they believe Oswald's fingerprints were lifted at the morgue onto the rifle

Please explain the process used to extract prints from a dead body at the morgue.

[John Iacoletti]

The evidence that he did is that Marina said she saw it, George De Mohrenschildt said he saw it, Jeanne De Mohrenschildt said she saw it,

How does seeing an object tell you anything about who owns it?

the Waldman exhibits, the Klein's money order, the WC testimony of Klein's Vice President William Waldman,

These tell you nothing about Oswald.

and Oswald's palm print being on the rifle found on the sixth floor of the TSBD.

No.  A partial palm print identified as Oswald's turned up a week later on an index card.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

Even if you could show that Oswald told a lie, the only thing that would be proof of is that he told a lie, not murder.